https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-6afded56d5 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-dc043c9e4e has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-6afded56d5 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-dc043c9e4e has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-dc043c9e4e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-dc043c9e4e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-6afded56d5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-6afded56d5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #14 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
--- Comment #13 from Tomas Hrcka ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/awf-gtk3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
c...@luigifab.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
--- Comment #11 from c...@luigifab.fr ---
Here is new build, I moved desktop file from debian-gtk3 to applications
directory.
Spec URL:
https://github.com/luigifab/awf-extended/raw/levelup/fedora-gtk3/awf-gtk3.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
--- Comment #10 from c...@luigifab.fr ---
Here is new build without Source1/Source2 (Andy suggestion), but with a
different source archive.
Spec URL:
https://github.com/luigifab/awf-extended/raw/levelup/fedora-gtk3/awf-gtk3.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
--- Comment #9 from c...@luigifab.fr ---
Here is a new build with missing:
- %license LICENSE
- %doc README.md
- Source2
Spec URL:
https://github.com/luigifab/awf-extended/raw/levelup/fedora-gtk3/awf-gtk3.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
--- Comment #8 from c...@luigifab.fr ---
I read more docs, and thanks to Andy (in another package), I fixed many things
for this package.
There is a big mistake before, because I did not publish awf-gtk3-2.2.0.tar.gz
but only
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
--- Comment #7 from c...@luigifab.fr ---
Sorry for this not really usefull message, but I updated the main repo with
2.2.0 final.
SPEC URL:
https://github.com/luigifab/awf-extended/blob/v2.2.0/fedora-gtk3/awf-gtk3.spec
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
--- Comment #6 from c...@luigifab.fr ---
Thank you very much!
I see an interesting thing in the SHOULD list: "Description and summary
sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported
Non-English languages, if
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
--- Comment #4 from c...@luigifab.fr ---
Thanks for your review.
Here are new links with your recommendations.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
--- Comment #2 from c...@luigifab.fr ---
My bad... thank you! I updated my spec (in first message) and I rebuild
packages.
I'm surprised that rpmlint say nothing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
c...@luigifab.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893323
Artur Frenszek-Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
24 matches
Mail list logo
