[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ppi...@redhat.com
   Assignee|bruno.cor...@hpe.com|nob...@fedoraproject.org
 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW



--- Comment #33 from Petr Pisar  ---
Bruno, when your package becomes ready for a review, simply remove "NotReady"
from the Whiteboard field.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234



--- Comment #32 from Otto Urpelainen  ---
Ok, thank you for the update. Just send an updated spec when it is ready so the
review can continue.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Bruno Cornec  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bruno.cor...@hpe.com
  Flags|needinfo?(bruno_cornec@hp.c |
   |om) |



--- Comment #31 from Bruno Cornec  ---
Indeed I intend to adapt the specfile so it matches Fedora's requirements, and
will work on it. However, don't expect a quick return as I'm also working on
upstream modifications as well.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Otto Urpelainen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||otu...@iki.fi
  Flags||needinfo?(bruno_cornec@hp.c
   ||om)



--- Comment #30 from Otto Urpelainen  ---
Bruno,

If you still want to include this package in Fedora, please clear the needinfo
tag and explain how you intend to continue. The first thing to do is to address
comments that have been already give. After that, I can review.

If you do not intend to continue, just leave the tag in place and this request
should be automatically closed in a month.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Robert-André Mauchin   changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||zebo...@gmail.com



--- Comment #29 from Robert-André Mauchin   ---

 - Use %global not %define

%global srcname mindi-busybox

 - Release should start at 1. Also please explain the extra release parameters:

Release:0.20201126002730.s3777M%{dist}

 - This ned to be justified usually:

# Cf: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588550
ExcludeArch:ppc

 We don't support ppc anymore, only ppc64le.

 - Please justify this or fix the package to make debuginfo work:

# Avoids to generate debug packages
%global debug_package %{nil}

The issue seems to be that busybox is stripped by the build process:

strip -s --remove-section=.note --remove-section=.comment \
busybox_unstripped -o busybox

 - Please provide the patch unzipped:

Patch0: 02-stime.fedora-33.gz

 - Please add a comment explaining what the patch does or why it is needed

 Not needed:

rm  -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

%defattr(-,root,root)

 - The license file must be included with %license in %files:

%doc ChangeLog AUTHORS README TODO NEWS
%license LICENSE

 - Add a BR for make

 - Use %make_build instead of make X

 - Use %set_build_flags before make to use Fedora build flags


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Bruno Cornec  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |NEW
 Resolution|DEFERRED|---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #28 from Bruno Cornec  ---
New try with these newly built packages for fedora 33:
SRPM:
ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/33/x86_64/mindi-busybox-1.25.1-0.20201126002730.s3777M.fc33.src.rpm
SPEC: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/33/x86_64/mindi-busybox.spec

Let me know how I can improve that and hopefully unblock the full MondoRescue
chain as I'm working on it again.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Bruno Cornec  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On|1900145 |





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1900145
[Bug 1900145] Review Request: perl-ProjectBuilder - perl modules from the
project-builder.org project used by MondoRescue
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Bruno Cornec  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On|1900146 |





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1900146
[Bug 1900146] Review Request: perl-MondoRescue - perl modules for MondoRescue
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Bruno Cornec  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1900146





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1900146
[Bug 1900146] Review Request: perl-MondoRescue - perl modules for MondoRescue
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Bruno Cornec  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1900145





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1900145
[Bug 1900145] Review Request: perl-ProjectBuilder - perl modules from the
project-builder.org project used by MondoRescue
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Carl George  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |DEFERRED
Last Closed||2019-02-25 15:39:58



--- Comment #27 from Carl George  ---
This appears to have stalled out.  I'm going to close this to get it off the
tracker [0], but feel free to re-open it if/when you're able to pick it back
up.

[0]: https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Till Maas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||opensou...@till.name



--- Comment #26 from Till Maas  ---
(In reply to Bruno Cornec from comment #23)
> buffer has now been built for fedora, so I'd like to work on this one again.
> I've requested the package on branch master

The package needs to pass review before it can be imported into Fedora/you can
request a branch. It seems there was an oversight, therefore I retired the
package for now. Once the review is done, you can request it to be unretired.

Btw. I noticed that the package is not yet using %license. Also I would prefer
I comment about why you do not want to build a debug package.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234



--- Comment #25 from Bruno Cornec  ---
Updating package references in order to run fedora-review and prepare upload

ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/23/x86_64/mindi-busybox-1.21.1-1.fc23.src.rpm
ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/fedora/23/x86_64/mindi-busybox.spec

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234



--- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/mindi-busybox

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234



--- Comment #23 from Bruno Cornec  ---
buffer has now been built for fedora, so I'd like to work on this one again.
I've requested the package on branch master

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Bruno Cornec  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(bruno_cornec@hp.c |
   |om) |



--- Comment #22 from Bruno Cornec  ---
Yes. Still want to provide it. We're now making progress on buffer on which
I'll concentrate effortd first. Then I'll work on this one again.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

James Hogarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||james.hoga...@gmail.com
  Flags||needinfo?(bruno_cornec@hp.c
   ||om)



--- Comment #21 from James Hogarth  ---
There has been no progress on this in a couple of years

Bruno do you still intend to have this reviewed?

If there is no response within one week as per policy it will be closed so that
others may take it up if they are interested to do so.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Miroslav Suchý  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||msu...@redhat.com
 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |



--- Comment #20 from Miroslav Suchý  ---
Bruno has been sponsored (fas name bcornec) therefore removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234
Bug 476234 depends on bug 1024549, which changed state.

Bug 1024549 Summary: Bundled MD5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024549

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Bruno Cornec br...@victoria.frmug.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||br...@victoria.frmug.org

--- Comment #13 from Bruno Cornec br...@victoria.frmug.org 2011-11-18 
19:11:37 EST ---
I'd like to get feedback on this request. My latest version is available at
ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/16/x86_64/mindi-busybox.spec and
ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/16/x86_64/mindi-busybox-1.18.5-0.2014000556.fc16.src.rpm

TIA for anyone able to help.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

--- Comment #12 from Caius Chance m...@kaio.net 2010-07-14 19:36:41 EDT ---
I had been reviewing this request as a brand new package. I am not sure if this
is duplicated to an existing component but in different version or else.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Caius Chance m...@kaio.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|m...@kaio.net |
 AssignedTo|m...@kaio.net |nob...@fedoraproject.org

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

--- Comment #11 from Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us 2010-05-04 12:39:06 EDT 
---
Caius https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Architecture_Support
the bug is supposed to be filed after the package has been accepted since it
doesn't yet have a component in bugzilla to file against. its not a blocker not
being in bugzilla.  but there should eb a description why in the spec that will
be swapped out for the bug info post acceptance.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Bruno Cornec br...@mondorescue.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||br...@mondorescue.org
   Flag|needinfo?(bruno_cor...@hp.c |
   |om),|
   |needinfo?(bruno_cor...@hp.c |
   |om) |

--- Comment #10 from Bruno Cornec br...@mondorescue.org 2010-05-03 18:39:17 
EDT ---
Created Bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588550 for lack of
power PC support.

gcc dep has been removed

mindi and mindi-busybox is not localized at the moment.

A new intermediate version of the packge is now available at:
ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/12/mindi-busybox-1.7.3-0.20100504003616.fc12.src.rpm
and 
ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/12/mindi-busybox.spec

Let me know if it looks better now

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ccha...@redhat.com

--- Comment #8 from Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2010-04-28 
22:34:28 EDT ---
./SPECS/mindi-busybox.spec:20: W: setup-not-quiet
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

# You might need a '-q' for setup.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ccha...@redhat.com
   Flag||fedora-review?,
   ||needinfo?(bruno_cor...@hp.c
   ||om)

--- Comment #9 from Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2010-04-28 
22:54:37 EDT ---
MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8]

# Need a bug filed in bugzilla and put the number next to the ExcludeArch line.

MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.

# gcc is in exceptions which is not needed.

MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9]

# Need a line %find_lang %{name} in %install section.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 476234] Review Request: mindi-busybox - Busybox version suited for Mindi

[bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476234

Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|ccha...@redhat.com  |

--- Comment #7 from Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2010-02-24 
02:33:44 EST ---
please ignore comment #4 and #5, thanks

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review