On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 03:54:05PM +0200, Michael Lundkvist wrote:
> On 09/01/2017 01:25 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> >
> > Am 01.09.2017 um 11:40 schrieb Niels de Vos:
> > > On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 09:36:16AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > how should it be fixed for
On 09/01/2017 01:25 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Am 01.09.2017 um 11:40 schrieb Niels de Vos:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 09:36:16AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Hi,
how should it be fixed for glusterfs now? Better shell code without
bashishm or do you want /bin/bash as shebang?
Do you have a
On 2017-09-01 16:55, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Am 01.09.2017 um 11:40 schrieb Niels de Vos:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 09:36:16AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Hi,
how should it be fixed for glusterfs now? Better shell code without
bashishm or do you want /bin/bash as shebang?
Do you have a
I'd prefer to remove the bashisms.
- Original Message -
> From: "Patrick Matthäi" <pmatth...@debian.org>
> To: packaging@gluster.org
> Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 3:36:16 AM
> Subject: [gluster-packaging] Fwd: Bug#873878: glusterfs-client:
> mount.
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 09:36:16AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how should it be fixed for glusterfs now? Better shell code without
> bashishm or do you want /bin/bash as shebang?
Do you have a preference? I do not know how much work is it is to
rewrite the mount.glusterfs script to
Hi,
how should it be fixed for glusterfs now? Better shell code without
bashishm or do you want /bin/bash as shebang?
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff:Bug#873878: glusterfs-client: mount.glusterfs needs bash as
/bin/sh
Weitersenden-Datum: Thu, 31 Aug 2017
