flachape...@inverse.ca said:
>I made some changes to properly close a violation :
>
>https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/commit/81443169eda4e4c62d570eca6ce44415a80a2e34
Francis,
Thanks! I'll try test this out. At least part of my problem may have been
the switch load. Apparently the
Hi Don
On 2013-05-21, at 12:56 PM, Don Greer wrote:
> Ok, violations is still very unhappy :^).
>
> First, when I set or turn “off” a violation, it does not reset the port on
> the machine that I modified the violation on. To make it change the port
> requires manually disconnecting and movi
Ok, violations is still very unhappy :^).
First, when I set or turn "off" a violation, it does not reset the port on the
machine that I modified the violation on. To make it change the port requires
manually disconnecting and moving the machine to another port to trigger that
logic. There is
