Hi Fabrice,
thank you for your reply.
The point is that PF has to do the accounting. We enabled pfbandwidthd
so we can get data from inline-accounting table.
The APs are "black boxes" for us - they are in bridged mode and the
configuration can not be adapted.
I know that this is not ideal, bu
Hi Till,
is your access point or switch are able to do radius accounting ?
Btw , you can find register/deregister functions in node.pm , violation
function in violation.pm.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2016-05-21 10:56, g4-l...@tonarchiv.ch a écrit :
> Hi there!
>
> We are using PF in level 2 inline mod
Hello Packetfence team
I would also agree to pay for a commercial support ticket, if required.
Could you give me this type of information? This would made my first
steps in the PF API much easier.
Best regards,
Till
On 21.05.2016 16:56, g4-l...@tonarchiv.ch wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> We are using
No one?
Cheers,
Till
On 21.05.2016 16:56, g4-l...@tonarchiv.ch wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> We are using PF in level 2 inline mode. Now I'd like to implement RADIUS
> accounting ability so we can collect accounting data from several inline
> PFs in a central DB.
>
> Can someone please give me some hin
