Re: [PacketFence-users] new PacketFence install

2016-09-13 Thread Louis Munro
Hi Tony, service packetfence status? > On Sep 13, 2016, at 10:18 AM, Tony Harris wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > I’m new to PacketFence as well as CentOS. I installed PacketFence on a test > box for evaluation. I was able to get to the web configuration web page after >

[PacketFence-users] new PacketFence install

2016-09-13 Thread Tony Harris
Hello Everyone, I'm new to PacketFence as well as CentOS. I installed PacketFence on a test box for evaluation. I was able to get to the web configuration web page after installation but didn't do any configurations because I didn't have my switch ready and I had to install some additional

Re: [PacketFence-users] Server Load metric

2016-09-13 Thread Tim DeNike
There is no optimal. It's better used as a baseline. If it's normally around 1.5 and today it's running at 10, something is possibly wrong. All that really matters is if the system is responsive enough to suit the task. It could be at 99 and doesn't really matter if radius responses are coming

Re: [PacketFence-users] Server Load metric

2016-09-13 Thread Torry, Andrew
This is all very useful and a fine exercise in Linux semantics, but it does not really help me much when I have a manager asking me what this stuff all means and whether the server up to the job or not. What is a good (aka safe) figure for a system say with 16G RAM and 8 cores. It strikes me