Hi Tony,
service packetfence status?
> On Sep 13, 2016, at 10:18 AM, Tony Harris wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone,
> I’m new to PacketFence as well as CentOS. I installed PacketFence on a test
> box for evaluation. I was able to get to the web configuration web page after
>
Hello Everyone,
I'm new to PacketFence as well as CentOS. I installed PacketFence on a test box
for evaluation. I was able to get to the web configuration web page after
installation but didn't do any configurations because I didn't have my switch
ready and I had to install some additional
There is no optimal. It's better used as a baseline. If it's normally
around 1.5 and today it's running at 10, something is possibly wrong. All
that really matters is if the system is responsive enough to suit the task.
It could be at 99 and doesn't really matter if radius responses are coming
This is all very useful and a fine exercise in Linux semantics, but it does not
really help me much when
I have a manager asking me what this stuff all means and whether the server up
to the job or not.
What is a good (aka safe) figure for a system say with 16G RAM and 8 cores.
It strikes me