Re: [PacketFence-users] New Install - No Data for Registrations/min

Try this then: Open a terminal and then run this command: # journalctl -u packetfence-carbon-cache -f Register a new node. Any node. Any output in the journalctl terminal? -- Louis Munro lmu...@inverse.ca :: www.inverse.ca

Re: [PacketFence-users] use_mppe in mschap radius module

> On May 4, 2017, at 13:45, Forum wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there any particular reason that in > /usr/local/pf/raddb/mods-enabled/mschap > use_mppe is set to yes in mschap{} > while in mschap chrooted_mschap{} use_mppe is set to no? > No. That's an oversight. What you are

Re: [PacketFence-users] PF Loses Ability to Regulate CLI Admin Access

Hello John, are you able to provide the radius debug ? raddebug -f var/run/radius.sock -t 300 Regards Fabrice Le 2017-05-04 à 12:28, John Whitten a écrit : > > Hello everybody, > > My company is presently running PF 6.5.0 and generally things seem to > be working well. Recently though

[PacketFence-users] use_mppe in mschap radius module

Hi, Is there any particular reason that in /usr/local/pf/raddb/mods-enabled/mschap use_mppe is set to yes in mschap{} while in mschap chrooted_mschap{} use_mppe is set to no? I am using the radius server of packetfence to authenticate vpn users of a Strongswan IPSEC/IKEv2 gateway by adding a

Re: [PacketFence-users] PF 7.0.0 - Connection Profile Preview not working as designed

Hello All, can you run pf-maint.pl and retry, i just made a patch to fix it. Regards Fabrice Le 2017-05-04 à 11:17, Torry, Andrew a écrit : > > Hi Antoine, > > > > Fabrice advised that I should apply the maintenance patch and I have > done this regularly but the problem still persists. > >

[PacketFence-users] PF Loses Ability to Regulate CLI Admin Access

Hello everybody, My company is presently running PF 6.5.0 and generally things seem to be working well. Recently though I've experienced a problem (actually on two separate occasions) with PF's ability to regulate CLI admin access to switches. Specifically we are using Cisco 2960's (I think

Re: [PacketFence-users] SG300 / SG500 couldn't get MAC at ifIndex

Hi Fabrice, thanks for your help, I will test it. In this example for “cisco small business”, a SG500 is specified as the switch type, -#-#- Once you have configured your switchports, you must configure the switch in PacketFence with the following information: Definition→Type: Cisco SG500

Re: [PacketFence-users] Can not restart packetfence after upgrade to 7.0

That command no longer exists in PF 7. PacketFence is a collection of services, not one service. As such it's handled as a "target" by systemd. E.g. # systemctl isolate packetfence You might find it easier to start and stop services using pfcmd: # /usr/local/pf/bin/pfcmd service pf start

Re: [PacketFence-users] SG300 / SG500 couldn't get MAC at ifIndex

Hello Stefan, i asked one of my coworker who worked with this sort of switches and portsec is not working with packetfence. What you can do is to use it with radius (https://packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_Network_Devices_Configuration_Guide.html#_cisco_small_business) Regards Fabrice Le

[PacketFence-users] Can not restart packetfence after upgrade to 7.0

Hi, Recently, I upgraded to Packetfence 7.0, following all instructions in the documentation. I can not restart packetfence manually: service packetfence restart Redirecting to /bin/systemctl restart packetfence.service Failed to restart packetfence.service: Unit packetfence.service failed to

Re: [PacketFence-users] PF 7.0.0 - Connection Profile Preview not working as designed

Hi Antoine, Fabrice advised that I should apply the maintenance patch and I have done this regularly but the problem still persists. The problem occurs from clicking 'Preview' from both the profile list and the profile 'Editor'. Thanks Andrew From: Antoine Amacher

Re: [PacketFence-users] SG300 / SG500 couldn't get MAC at ifIndex

Hi Fabrice, SG300 / SG500 do not know CISCO-PORT-SECURITY-MIB 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.315.1.2.1.1.1 [root@PacketFence-ZEN etc]# snmpwalk -v 2c -c public 172.16.32.249 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.315.1.2.1.1.1 SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.315.1.2.1.1.1 = No Such Object available on this agent at this OID Regards

Re: [PacketFence-users] PF 7.0.0 - Connection Profile Preview not working as designed

Hello Andrew, Did you re-apply the maintenance? Is this happening when you click 'Preview" via the connection profile list or when you are in the configuration of a connection profile or both case? Thanks On 05/04/2017 10:10 AM, Torry, Andrew wrote: I am pretty sure this is a bug as I

Re: [PacketFence-users] PF 7.0.0 - Connection Profile Preview not working as designed

I am pretty sure this is a bug as I have rebuilt a new server and still have the same issue. The 'Preview' option in the admin GUI displays the 'Default' profile for all profiles. Regards Andrew From: Torry, Andrew [mailto:andrew.to...@fxplus.ac.uk] Sent: 27 April 2017 14:01 To: