Il 12/12/2018 08:17, Nicolas Quiniou-Briand ha scritto:
Hello,
On 2018-12-12 7:46 a.m., Enrico Becchetti wrote:
Hello !
"Configuration->Policies and Access Control-> Roles" I've added
"PF-WEB",
"Max Nodes per user" equal to 0 and default Traffic Shaping.
You just create the role. To
Hello,
On 2018-12-12 7:46 a.m., Enrico Becchetti wrote:
Hello !
"Configuration->Policies and Access Control-> Roles" I've added "PF-WEB",
"Max Nodes per user" equal to 0 and default Traffic Shaping.
You just create the role. To assign it, you need to create an
authentication rule in your
Hello,
I have find the solution for me in this post
https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/issues/2291
In my first post, i'm using IAP 105.
For IAP 305, i have modified the Aruba.pm (it's works on the 2 IAP models)
and restart packetfence.
*I don't use COA in the switch configuration*
The
Il 11/12/2018 15:31, Nicolas Quiniou-Briand via PacketFence-users ha
scritto:
Hello Enrico,
Where did you assign the PF-WEB role ?
Hello !
"Configuration->Policies and Access Control-> Roles" I've added "PF-WEB",
"Max Nodes per user" equal to 0 and default Traffic Shaping.
Thanks
Enrico
--
>From the log file after a ticket was logged and the day after.
Dec 10 02:26:51 pf2018 pfdhcplistener: pfqueue(14407) INFO: [mac:unknown]
DHCPREQUEST from 28:e3:47:58:07:68 (131.210.168.141)
(pf::dhcp::processor_v4::parse_dhcp_request)
Dec 10 02:26:51 pf2018 pfdhcplistener: pfqueue(13300) INFO:
Hi,
>
> *Just go into the Audit Log or Node Tab, select the device, set the State
> to registered and choose the desired role :) *
> *Reevaluate access or restart Switchport => You should got the specified
> rule. *
>
> I had tried this before and it was not working. Maybe because it was a
>
Tobias,
Just go into the Audit Log or Node Tab, select the device, set the State to
registered and choose the desired role :)
Reevaluate access or restart Switchport => You should got the specified rule.
I had tried this before and it was not working. Maybe because it was a VoIP
device
Hello Enrico,
Where did you assign the PF-WEB role ?
--
Nicolas Quiniou-Briand
n...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 *140 :: https://inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (https://sogo.nu), PacketFence
(https://packetfence.org) and Fingerbank (http://fingerbank.org)
Dear Fabrice and all !
I need a new help to solve this easy question.
My Linux Centos 7.1810 with PF 8.2.1 has the right SAML link
to IDP but when device tries to connect this message is shown
"you do not have permission to register a device with this username"
so the authentication phase
Hello,
On 2018-12-02 1:47 p.m., Murilo Calegari via PacketFence-users wrote:
Hi everyone, is the token for the API designed to expire? If so, after
how much time?
https://packetfence.org/doc/api/#/default/post_login
"This will perform a login against the PacketFence system user, the
Hi Nicolas
Thanks for the reply.
I did see the tenant ID is set to 1 automatically for users, and I cannot
remove or change the tenant id.
I have upgraded to version 8.2 and applied the patches.
The issue is still there.
Regards
Ian Alder
>-Original Message-
>From: Nicolas
Hello Ian,
On 2018-12-11 12:16 p.m., Ian Alder wrote:
The issue is still there.
Yes, keep an eye on this GitHub issue [0].
You can also post a comment to make things progress.
[0] https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/issues/3681
--
Nicolas Quiniou-Briand
n...@inverse.ca ::
Hello Fabrice,
>
> The configuration of my switch is marked as that option EXTERNAL PORTAL
> ENFORCEMENT, and when I try to make the connection with the packetfence I
> get the error in the attachment name: Error1 in attachment.
> When the EXTERNAL PORTAL ENFORCEMENT Option is unchecked, it
Tobias,
Thanks for the information on the switch config. We are considering a support
subscription, however we are still in the demo/testing/evaluation phase.
Fabrice,
Thanks for the patch.
I think the critical part was the "getVoipVsa" function returning the
Hello Francis,
The configuration of my switch is marked as that option EXTERNAL PORTAL
ENFORCEMENT, and when I try to make the connection with the packetfence I
get the error in the attachment name: Error1 in attachment.
When the EXTERNAL PORTAL ENFORCEMENT Option is unchecked, it displays the
15 matches
Mail list logo
