Hello Peter,
On 03/02/2020 19:03, Truax, Peter via PacketFence-users wrote:
We are having trouble getting our parking portal working after upgrading
to 9.2 from 9.0.1. When a user tries to go to the registration portal
and they have been parked, the browser just displays and error of
I am running on Hyper-V.
Peter Truax
Network Administrator
Saint Martin’s University
From: Serhiy Morhun via PacketFence-users
Sent: Saturday, February 1, 2020 3:08 PM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Serhiy Morhun
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] [External] Re: R: Fingerbank
I've got a simple internal authentication source for logging into the admin
portal via AD group membership. When I run ./pftest I get the following:
Authenticating against 'SYS_PacketFence_Admin' in context 'portal'
Authentication SUCCEEDED against SYS_PacketFence_Admin (Authentication
So I guess I'm not understanding a fundamental concept in PacketFence... I
ended up moving this new authentication source up to the highest priority
and admin portal authentication started working. So, I'm guessing
authentication sources operate on a first-match basis? Meaning, that if I
had an
We are having trouble getting our parking portal working after upgrading to 9.2
from 9.0.1. When a user tries to go to the registration portal and they have
been parked, the browser just displays and error of TOO_MANY_REDIRECTS.
This was working in 9.0.1, where it displayed a simple page
For the record, it's a bug in PF:
https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/issues/5106
--
Nicolas Quiniou-Briand
n...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 *140 :: https://inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (https://sogo.nu), PacketFence
(https://packetfence.org) and Fingerbank
I've solved adding GPG_PUBLIC_KEY manually
RegardsIl lunedì 3 febbraio 2020, 13:21:36 CET, Andrea Lenarduzzi
ha scritto:
wget -O - https://inverse.ca/downloads/GPG_PUBLIC_KEY--2020-02-03 13:20:54--
https://inverse.ca/downloads/GPG_PUBLIC_KEYRisoluzione di inverse.ca
wget -O - https://inverse.ca/downloads/GPG_PUBLIC_KEY--2020-02-03 13:20:54--
https://inverse.ca/downloads/GPG_PUBLIC_KEYRisoluzione di inverse.ca
(inverse.ca)... 192.95.20.194, 2607:5300:201:2000::11:1681Connessione a
inverse.ca (inverse.ca)|192.95.20.194|:443... connesso.ERRORE: il
Hello David,
On 30/01/2020 15:54, David Harvey via PacketFence-users wrote:
I currently have a functional setup where users get allocated their
VLANs properly regardless of if they do MAB or EAP, but I've not for
love nor money been able to work out how to discriminate between the two
Hi Uzzi,
It looks fine from my point of view.
https://www.sslshopper.com/ssl-checker.html#hostname=https://inverse.ca/downloads/GPG_PUBLIC_KEY
MJ
On 3-2-2020 11:36, Andrea Lenarduzzi via PacketFence-users wrote:
I've add http://inverse.ca/downloads/PacketFence/debian stretch to
I've add http://inverse.ca/downloads/PacketFence/debian stretch to
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/packetfence.list, then wget -O -
https://inverse.ca/downloads/GPG_PUBLIC_KEY -> Certificate Error
Whow can I fix it?
RegardsUzzi___
PacketFence-users mailing
Hello Charles,
1. Which error message did you get in Firefox ?
--
Nicolas Quiniou-Briand
n...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 *140 :: https://inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (https://sogo.nu), PacketFence
(https://packetfence.org) and Fingerbank (http://fingerbank.org)
Hi all, any pointers at all?
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 10:54 PM David Harvey
wrote:
> Dear Packetfencers,
>
> I've been struggling with this logic for a while, so I'm going to admit
> defeat and defer to the wisdom of the list.
>
> Aim:
> Allow a maximum or predefined VLAN allocation for MAB
13 matches
Mail list logo
