Re: [PacketFence-users] High CPU utilization

> On Jan 19, 2016, at 17:16 , Jason Maher wrote: > > Could someone explain to me what the difference between the registration > interface and the isolation interface is? Registration is the interface on which the registration portal is listening. Isolation is the interface

Re: [PacketFence-users] High CPU utilization

Could someone explain to me what the difference between the registration interface and the isolation interface is? CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION DO NOT DISTRIBUTE - The information in this email and any attachments is confidential, privileged and intended only for the recipient listed above. If you

[PacketFence-users] High CPU utilization

Hello! I'm seeing some high CPU usage today: I tried bouncing the PF services but it came right back. pfqueue seems to be using quite a bit of CPU, how can I check to see if everything is okay? I tried this from another message on the list but I do not know how to interpret the response:

Re: [PacketFence-users] High CPU utilization

To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] High CPU utilization Hi Jake, There are fingerbank performance improvements in the latest packages for it. I would suggest upgrading fingerbank (and packetfence to 5.5.2) when you have a chance). There is also a change

Re: [PacketFence-users] High CPU utilization

To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] High CPU utilization Hi Jake, It could be a caching issue or related to fingerbank. Can you tell us the version of your fingerbank and packetfence packages please? Also, please post the content of these two files: /usr

Re: [PacketFence-users] High CPU utilization

St. > Belton, Texas > 76513 > Fone: 254-295-4658 > Phax: 254-295-4221 > > > From: Louis Munro [lmu...@inverse.ca] > > Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 8:47 AM > > To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] High CPU ut

Re: [PacketFence-users] High CPU utilization

> On Jan 11, 2016, at 12:23 , Sallee, Jake wrote: > > Louis: > > I must have missed the update announcement. > > I'll apply the update as son as I can. > > Am I reading the upgrade doc correctly that there is no DB schema update > between 5.5.04 and 5.5.2? Correct,

Re: [PacketFence-users] High CPU utilization

Hi Jake, It could be a caching issue or related to fingerbank. Can you tell us the version of your fingerbank and packetfence packages please? Also, please post the content of these two files: /usr/local/pf/conf/chi.conf /usr/local/fingerbank/conf/fingerbank.conf Regards, -- Louis Munro