Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server

) >> Feb 26 11:59:24 pfcmd.pl(1357) FATAL: Insecure dependency in kill while >> running with -T switch at /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/services/manager.pm line 544. >>(pf::services::manager::isAlive) >> Feb 26 11:59:48 pfcmd.pl(1451) INFO: pidof -x p0f returned 1923 1921 >&

Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server

k out exactly when this starts to happen. > > Cheers, > Andi > > -Original Message- > From: James Rouzier [mailto:jrouz...@inverse.ca] > Sent: 26 February 2016 14:57 > To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing wit

Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server

: James Rouzier [mailto:jrouz...@inverse.ca] Sent: 26 February 2016 14:57 To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server You would also need to update the database configuration in conf/pfconfig.conf James Rouzier jrouz

Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server

6 11:59:48 pfcmd.pl(1451) FATAL: Insecure dependency in kill while > running with -T switch at /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/services/manager.pm line 544. > (pf::services::manager::isAlive) > > What am I doing wrong? > > Cheers, > Andi > > -Original Message- > From:

Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server

[mailto:amor...@cardiffmet.ac.uk] Sent: 26 February 2016 12:18 To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server Thanks for your help Fabrice, OK, so this isn't working as it supposedly should. I've setup the schema and granted

Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server

2016 16:03 To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server Importance: Low Yes exactly, mysql is a dependency but disable it when the system start. Le Jeudi, Février 25, 2016 10:49 EST, "Morris, Andi" <amor...@car

Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server

> On Feb 25, 2016, at 10:49 , Morris, Andi wrote: > > So for the actual packetfence server I just install as the complete package, > but just ignore/disable the local mysql installation? That’s what I have been doing for a while now. It’s the safe choice, making

Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server

; but just ignore/disable the local mysql installation? > > Cheers, > Andi > > -Original Message- > From: Fabrice Durand [mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca] > Sent: 25 February 2016 15:29 > To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Instal

Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server

@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server Importance: Low Hello Andi, you just need to install a mysql server (mysql, mariadb, gallera-cluster ...), import db/pf-schema.sql. And: GRANT SELECT,INSERT,UPDATE,DELETE,EXECUTE,LOCK TABLES ON pf.* TO pf

Re: [PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server

Hello Andi, you just need to install a mysql server (mysql, mariadb, gallera-cluster ...), import db/pf-schema.sql. And: GRANT SELECT,INSERT,UPDATE,DELETE,EXECUTE,LOCK TABLES ON pf.* TO pf@172.20.20.1 IDENTIFIED BY packetfence; GRANT DROP ON pf.radius_nas TO pf@172.20.20.1 IDENTIFIED BY

[PacketFence-users] Installing with separate database server

Hi all. Just wondering what the best practice is for installing packetfence with a separate mysql database server. Do I need to install packetfence on the main server without the mysql elements? If so, what's the best way to do that so that I don't miss out a vital dependency when installing