David,
That is very interesting/useful information!
I’ll make sure to take good note of this while reworking the self-registration
workflow.
Cheers!
dw.
--
Derek Wuelfrath
dwuelfr...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 (x110) :: +1.866.353.6153 (x110)
Inverse inc. (www.inverse.ca) :: Leaders behind
Hi,
I'm fairly driven by what marketing wants this time, but for things like
conference registrations, I'm going to be definitely looking into the
OAuth/SSO options. Will be keeping an interested eye out for what you guys
come up with though :)
Another couple of learnings, thanks to our webteam
David,
Peripherally of interest, perhaps: An issue we ran into when doing a bit of
user testing: people moaned about having to fill in too many fields.
An acquaintance of mine commented on this, and said that they've got research
saying that the max fields people hit before they get sick of
: holger.patz...@t-systems.com
-Original Message-
From: Fabrice DURAND [mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca]
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 3:44 PM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Storing extra information in the
database from a guest portal page
Hi,
On this:
Also we probably remove name and surname from the default template and
this will be part of the mandatory fields configuration
Peripherally of interest, perhaps: An issue we ran into when doing a bit of
user testing: people moaned about having to fill in too many fields.
An
Hi David,
Le 2015-05-08 09:32, David Murrell a écrit :
Hi Fabrice,
I can happily confirm that the patch worked - thanks :) - I've been
able to populate data into the custom_field_[123] columns.
Cool :-)
I'm assuming that the rej hunks were built from a patch upstream of
5.0.2 and 4.7? I
Hi Fabrice,
I can happily confirm that the patch worked - thanks :) - I've been able
to populate data into the custom_field_[123] columns.
I'm assuming that the rej hunks were built from a patch upstream of 5.0.2
and 4.7? I merged the extra but not marked as + code lines , and all seems
to be
: Thursday, May 07, 2015 2:37 PM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Storing extra information in the
database from a guest portal page
Hi David,
i just did a test on a 4.7 version and there is only 3 conflicts that are
really easy to fix.
So it's as you
: Thursday, May 07, 2015 2:37 PM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Storing extra information in the
database from a guest portal page
Hi David,
i just did a test on a 4.7 version and there is only 3 conflicts that are
really easy to fix.
So it's as you
Hi David,
this is exactly what we are working on.
We made a branch (fix/mandatory_fields) that fix that. If you want you
can try to apply the patch of this branch to your setup
(https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/inverse-inc/packetfence/pull/516.diff).
Also it will be available in
Hi David,
i just did a test on a 4.7 version and there is only 3 conflicts that
are really easy to fix.
So it's as you want,patch 4.7 or install 5.0.2 and patch it or wait for 5.1.
Regards
Fabrice
Le 2015-05-07 08:06, David Murrell a écrit :
Hi,
That's awesome. :)
I'll apply it tomorrow,
Hi,
That's awesome. :)
I'll apply it tomorrow, and see how it goes. Does it need 5.0.2?
Cheers,
David
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Durand fabrice fdur...@inverse.ca wrote:
Hi David,
this is exactly what we are working on.
We made a branch (fix/mandatory_fields) that fix that. If you
Hi Fabrice,
Du you have a planned release date for 5.1, yet?
Regards,
Holger
-Original Message-
From: Fabrice DURAND [mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca]
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 2:37 PM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Storing extra information
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Storing extra information in the database
from a guest portal page
Hi David,
i just did a test on a 4.7 version and there is only 3 conflicts that are
really easy to fix.
So it's as you want,patch 4.7 or install 5.0.2
Hi,
I'm a bit stuck. For a openday here on campus for prospective students,
(using packetfence 4.7.0) marketing wants visting students to have wifi
internet access on the day in return for some extra data gathered via a
custom portal page.
-- this might be important? I'm not using the default
15 matches
Mail list logo
