Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults

2020-10-11 Thread Jeff Linden via PacketFence-users
shows 66.70.255.147 attached to interface lo. Thank you very much for your assistance Fabrice. Jeff From: Fabrice Durand Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 4:17 PM To: Jeff Linden ; packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults

Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults

2020-10-11 Thread Jeff Linden via PacketFence-users
ceforge.net<mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults Can i see the keepalived.conf ? And do you have something (like error) in the logs about keepalived (journalctl -f | grep keepalived) when you restart it

Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults

2020-10-11 Thread Jeff Linden via PacketFence-users
et> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults When you restart keepalived does the ip appear on lo ? Does keepalived start ? Le 20-10-09 à 15 h 20, Jeff Linden a écrit : Fabrice, I realized that I tested previously with the line commented out of pf.conf.defaults.

Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults

2020-10-09 Thread Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users
:* Fabrice Durand *Sent:* Friday, October 9, 2020 4:17 PM *To:* Jeff Linden ; packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net *Subject:* Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults http://inverse.ca/downloads/PacketFence/debian-lastrelease/pool/stretch/k/keepalived/ Le 20-10

Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults

2020-10-09 Thread Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
-users@lists.sourceforge.net *Subject:* Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults What is the keepalived version you are running ? It's suppose to be keepalived-2.0.20-2.1.x86_64 but yours looks different. Le 20-10-09 à 15 h 57, Jeff Linden a écrit : There is one w

Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults

2020-10-09 Thread Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
dev eth0.247 } *From:* Fabrice Durand *Sent:* Friday, October 9, 2020 3:51 PM *To:* Jeff Linden ; packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net *Subject:* Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults Can i see the keepalived.conf ? And do you have something (like error

Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults

2020-10-09 Thread Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
, 2020 3:30 PM *To:* Jeff Linden ; packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net *Subject:* Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults When you restart keepalived does the ip appear on lo ? Does keepalived start ? Le 20-10-09 à 15 h 20, Jeff Linden a écrit : Fabrice

Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults

2020-10-09 Thread Jeff Linden via PacketFence-users
mailto:jlin...@jerviswebb.com>>; packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults Does the ip is assigned to lo ? (ip a) Check the keepalived.conf file if

Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults

2020-10-09 Thread Jeff Linden via PacketFence-users
: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults Does the ip is assigned to lo ? (ip a) No, it is not assigned to lo. Only 127.0.0.1/8 is assigned Check the keepalived.conf file if it contain the ip 66.70.255.147 (var/conf/keepalived.conf

Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults

2020-10-09 Thread Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
, October 9, 2020 3:10 PM *To:* Fabrice Durand ; packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net *Cc:* Jeff Linden *Subject:* Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults Does the ip is assigned to lo ? (ip a)   No, it is not assigned to lo.  Only 127.0.0.1/8

Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults

2020-10-09 Thread Jeff Linden via PacketFence-users
Friday, October 9, 2020 2:18 PM To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Fabrice Durand Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults Hello Jeff, your issue is because keepalived is not running. let's try: /usr/local/pf/bin/pfcmd service pf updates

Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults

2020-10-09 Thread Jeff Linden via PacketFence-users
Ahead From: Fabrice Durand Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 2:59 PM To: Jeff Linden ; packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults Does the ip is assigned to lo ? (ip a) Check the keepalived.conf file if it contain

Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults

2020-10-09 Thread Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
t:* Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults Does the ip is assigned to lo ? (ip a) Check the keepalived.conf file if it contain the ip 66.70.255.147 (var/conf/keepalived.conf). Also check if there is not a keepalived.conf.rpmnew somewhere. Regards Fabrice Le 20

Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults

2020-10-09 Thread Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
:18 PM *To:* packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net *Cc:* Fabrice Durand *Subject:* Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults Hello Jeff, your issue is because keepalived is not running. let's try: /usr/local/pf/bin/pfcmd service pf updatesystemd systemctl r

Re: [PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults

2020-10-09 Thread Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
Hello Jeff, your issue is because keepalived is not running. let's try: /usr/local/pf/bin/pfcmd service pf updatesystemd systemctl restart packetfence-keepalived.service Regards Fabrice Le 20-10-09 à 14 h 11, Jeff Linden via PacketFence-users a écrit : Hello, I’ve upgraded PacketFence

[PacketFence-users] captive_portal.ip_address in pf.conf.defaults

2020-10-09 Thread Jeff Linden via PacketFence-users
Hello, I’ve upgraded PacketFence from 9.2 to 10.1. Since then, I’ve had trouble getting the Captive Portal to function. Since I noticed a newer version is available, I have now upgraded to 10.2 before writing this. In the web interface, under Status -> Services, the haproxy-portal is enabled