On 22/03/12 15:48, Rich Graves wrote:
> VLAN flapping is used because it's vendor-neutral. There exists an RFE
> to use vendor-specific RADIUS attributes to assign Aruba roles in some
> future version. Maybe the same sort of code could be used with Meraki.
v3.3 will have roles support. It'll be p
> Yes that is correct I work for Meraki. Am I not allowed to participate?
I meant that in a positive sense -- you're likely to have some influence and a
better-than-average chance of knowing what you're talking about.
> The idea is that both the wired and wireless clients use packetfence for a
Hi Ian,
> Yes that is correct I work for Meraki. Am I not allowed to participate?
Yes you are, of course! :)
> The idea is that both the wired and wireless clients use packetfence for
> a single pane of management and authorization. I understand that it is
> open source so I was thinking that I c
Thursday, March 22, 2012 2:48 PM
> *To:* packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Subject:* Re: [Packetfence-users] PacketFence at a Network Level
>
> ** **
>
> (Folks, meraki.com is a vendor.)
>
> ** **
>
> VLAN flapping is used because it's vendor-neut
dth
System Engineer
University of Mary Hardin-Baylor
900 College St.
Belton TX. 76513
Fone: 254-295-4658
Phax: 254-295-4221
From: Rich Graves [mailto:rgra...@carleton.edu]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 2:48 PM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Packetfence-users] PacketFence a
(Folks, meraki.com is a vendor.)
VLAN flapping is used because it's vendor-neutral. There exists an RFE to use
vendor-specific RADIUS attributes to assign Aruba roles in some future version.
Maybe the same sort of code could be used with Meraki.
I would flip Jake's question and inquire what
users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Packetfence-users] PacketFence at a Network Level
Greetings,
I have been reading through PacketFence documentation and I am working on
integrating the server with an existing AP deployment. I'd like to summarize
how the PF solution works for my own understanding, plea
Greetings,
I have been reading through PacketFence documentation and I am working on
integrating the server with an existing AP deployment. I'd like to
summarize how the PF solution works for my own understanding, please
correct me where I am wrong. As far as I can tell the PF solution works by
fi
