Hello Nicolas,
fingerbank-collector-1.2.2-1.el7.x86_64 is installed but the mails even
arrive.
Regards,
Hubert
Am 14.01.20 um 14:11 schrieb Nicolas Quiniou-Briand via PacketFence-users:
Hello,
Could you try to upgrade fingerbank-collector package to
I can confirm as well. Fingerbank-collector upgrade resolved issue with
crashes but no help with hitting hourly API limits.
So my questions are:
1. Is there any way to reduce Upstream API calls? I thought only new
unrecognized devices on the network should cause an API call to the cloud.
Also, I
I opened a feature request on your bug tracker:
https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/issues/5064
--
Nicolas Quiniou-Briand
n...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 *140 :: https://inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (https://sogo.nu), PacketFence
(https://packetfence.org) and
Hi Andrew,
Could you provide us extract of your security_event.conf with security
event mentioned ?
--
Nicolas Quiniou-Briand
n...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 *140 :: https://inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (https://sogo.nu), PacketFence
(https://packetfence.org) and
Hello,
We are checking if it possible to disable feature that increase API
requests. We will keep you informed.
--
Nicolas Quiniou-Briand
n...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 *140 :: https://inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (https://sogo.nu), PacketFence
This is what I am getting:
01-16-2020 08:50:33 Syslog.Warning 172.20.0.200 WLC-5508: *apfReceiveTask:
Jan 16 08:52:20.860: %APF-4-MOBILESTATION_NOT_FOUND: [SA]apf_ms.c:8463
Could not find the mobile 34:08:bc:69:4e:aa in internal database
01-16-2020 08:50:33 Syslog.Info 172.20.0.200 WLC-5508:
Hi,
I had a security event I created back in version 9.0.1 and I have letters
in the name of it, and now with version 9.3, it will not let me rename or
delete because of the letters in the name. It is locked from editing and
can't validate when trying to delete it. Any help is appreciated.
Hello Enrico,
I tested on a 9.3.0 setup and you're right: the behavior you described
is the current one.
I suppose there is a good reason to have this behavior so I will see
internally and give you a feedback.
Current behavior is not perfect for the reason you mentioned. On top of
that,
Hello,
Thanks for your feedback Hubert.
My coworker Julien told me that since PF 9.2.0, we use
fingerbank-collector 1.2.0 [1] and this one track more data than
previously. That could cause more requests on API
Anyway, I will check if I see some unusual behavior
[1]