[PacketFence-users] online/offline users not updating

2016-05-25 Thread Jan-Patrick Perisse 
Hello. What do I have to config so that the online/offline users update?
I have everything setup with RADIUS and AFAIK it should be based on acct-start 
and acct-stop, right?
Please help me on that.




JAN-PATRICK PÉRISSÉ
Diretor técnico
www.aeon.com.br    +55 21 2705-3139



--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] 802.11x autoregister

2016-05-25 Thread Jan-Patrick Perisse 
I eventually made it work. I was restarting httpd.aaa but it doesn’t reload the 
rules.
Now I restart by bin/pfcmd configreload. Is there a better way?

> On 25 de mai de 2016, at 9:25 AM, Fabrice Durand  wrote:
> 
> Hello Jan-Patrick,
> 
> do you have the log when you receive the radius request ?
> 
> Regards
> Fabrice
> 
> Le 2016-05-24 12:29, Jan-Patrick Perisse a écrit :
>> Hello people, 
>> I have ZEN 6.0.1 installed and I am currently testing.
>> I don’t want people on the network to get to the portal for registration. 
>> So, I have setup a config to auto register anyone that can authenticate on 
>> AD. Besides that, I will setup printers and other devices to auto register 
>> via MAC.
>> My setup is working properly for wired workstation (although they 
>> re-authenticate every minute and I can’t get rid of it).
>> But for wireless, I have WPA2 Enterprise on unifi and PF doesn’t seem to 
>> apply the rule.
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> [etherneteap]
>> filter = connection_type
>> operator = is
>> value = Ethernet-EAP
>> 
>> [reg:etherneteap]
>> scope = AutoRegister
>> role = default
>> 
>> [wetherneteap]
>> filter = connection_type
>> operator = is
>> value = Wireless-802.11-EAP
>> 
>> [reg:wetherneteap]
>> scope = AutoRegister
>> role = default
>> 
>> You can see it’s the same rule but LOG says:
>> For wireless
>> May 24 12:21:36 httpd.aaa(14492) DEBUG: [mac:c0:f2:fb:b4:d7:04] 
>> instantiating new pf::access_filter::vlan (pf::access_filter::new)
>> May 24 12:21:36 httpd.aaa(14492) DEBUG: [mac:c0:f2:fb:b4:d7:04] No rule 
>> matched for scope AutoRegister (pf::access_filter::test)
>> 
>> For wired
>> May 24 12:24:54 httpd.aaa(14492) DEBUG: [mac:e8:40:f2:3a:b1:77] 
>> instantiating new pf::access_filter::vlan (pf::access_filter::new)
>> May 24 12:24:54 httpd.aaa(14492) INFO: [mac:e8:40:f2:3a:b1:77] Match rule 
>> reg:etherneteap (pf::access_filter::test)
>> May 24 12:24:54 httpd.aaa(14492) INFO: [mac:e8:40:f2:3a:b1:77] Instantiate 
>> profile default (pf::Portal::ProfileFactory::_from_profile)
>> May 24 12:24:54 httpd.aaa(14492) DEBUG: [mac:e8:40:f2:3a:b1:77] 
>> instantiating new pf::Portal::Profile object (pf::Portal::Profile::new)
>> May 24 12:24:54 httpd.aaa(14492) DEBUG: [mac:e8:40:f2:3a:b1:77] 
>> instantiating new pf::access_filter::vlan (pf::access_filter::new)
>> May 24 12:24:54 httpd.aaa(14492) DEBUG: [mac:e8:40:f2:3a:b1:77] No engine 
>> found for NodeInfoForAutoReg (pf::access_filter::test)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> JAN-PATRICK PÉRISSÉ
>> Diretor técnico
>> www.aeon.com.br +55 21 2705-3139
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
>> bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
>> restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
>> apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
>> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
>> 
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Fabrice Durand
> fdur...@inverse.ca  ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  
> www.inverse.ca 
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu 
> ) and PacketFence (http://packetfence.org 
> ) 
> --
> Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
> bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
> restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
> apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j___
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users




JAN-PATRICK PÉRISSÉ
Diretor técnico
www.aeon.com.br    +55 21 2705-3139



--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j___
PacketFence-users mailing list

[PacketFence-users] Error when saving changes on existing user sources

2016-05-25 Thread Josef Loipersberger 
Hi everybody,

today I installed pf 6.0.1 on Debian 8 following the instructions
provided by packetfence.org .

Everything was finel but I was confronted with a strange behaviour:

If I add an internal user source using the web interface the source
will be added without problems.
An added Active Directory user source worked well for example.

But if I change the settings afterwards I will get "Error! The
authentication source was not found." when trying to save the changes.

This happens for every type of internal user source, even for the
existing default ones.

Does anybody have seen this behaviour yet?


Regards,

Josef


--
Klinikum Passau
Eigenbetrieb der Stadt Passau
Sitz: Innstr. 76, 94032 Passau
Werkleitung: Stefan Nowack
Träger: Stadt Passau, Rathausplatz 2+3, 94032 Passau

--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt / Packetfence give me your feedbacks boys !

2016-05-25 Thread PROST pierrick 
Hi frederic, we will try with a microtic wAP AC, it can be a good approach. 
Thanks for time spending to respond me.


Regards


De : Frederic Hermann [mailto:fherm...@neptune.fr]
Envoyé : mercredi 25 mai 2016 14:28
À : packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : Re: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt / Packetfence give 
me your feedbacks boys !

We have some unifi AP AC PRO, running on openwrt 14.07 when dual-band is 
required. AFAIK it's the only unifi AC we've got.

It's working, but those devices are more difficult to deal with:

* If you use VLAN (and you should), you have to configure the internal 
switching device with all your (tagged) VLAN, including for the management. The 
internal switching device cannot deal with both tagged and untagged VLAN (it's 
a restriction/feature of the driver)
* It is composed of 2 radio devices (for 2.4 and 5 GHz), so you have to change 
the packetfence hostapd module to deal with deauthentication on both devices.

De: "PROST pierrick" >
À: 
packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Envoyé: Mercredi 25 Mai 2016 11:11:56
Objet: Re: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt / Packetfence give 
me your feedbacks boys !
Thanks for four feedback Frederic. Have you try the Ubiquiti Unifi AC serie ?


Pierrick

De : Frederic Hermann [mailto:frederic.herm...@neptune.fr]
Envoyé : mardi 24 mai 2016 15:38
À : 
packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : Re: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt / Packetfence give 
me your feedbacks boys !


We successfully use packetfence with Ubiquity devices (mostly unifi, running 
with openwrt 14.07) and Mikrotik devices (with RouterOS 6.35).

If you go with Mikrotik, that would be an error to use openwrt, IMHO, as 
RouterOS provides probably more features you will need.

The learning curve for mikrotik management can be shallow, however.

Regards,




--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] 0 mac adresse with iphone Unable to match MAC address to IP

2016-05-25 Thread PROST pierrick 
Hi Fabrice,

I follow inline guide, active omapi  When i try to reboot DHCPD service ,he 
looks down  :

/usr/local/pf/bin/pfcmd service dhcpd status
service|shouldBeStarted|pid
dhcpd|1|0


root@packetfence:~# /usr/local/pf/bin/pfcmd service dhcpd restart
service|command
dhcpd|already stopped
httpd.admin|already started
Checking configuration sanity...
dhcpd|not started


I was mislead, for me everything worked for two things :

-  from web-interface "perform checkup" => no problem detected

-  service pfdhcplistner is running


With wich log file I can debug dhcpd service ? I try to activate / desactivate 
OMAPI but no result.

Thanks for your help.

Pierrick

De : Fabrice Durand [mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca]
Envoyé : mercredi 25 mai 2016 14:15
À : packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : Re: [PacketFence-users] 0 mac adresse with iphone Unable to match MAC 
address to IP

Hello Pierrick,

can you enable OMAPI (configuration -> OMAPI) and retry ?

Regards
Fabrice

Le 2016-05-25 07:08, PROST pierrick a écrit :
Hi everyone,
I'm continu to testing captive portal (inline configuration), we have problem 
with iphone 4S (ios 9.3.2), there is log file . Someone as an idea ?


Regards

May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1542) INFO: [mac:38:59:f9:14:62:37] Instantiate a 
new iptables modification method. pf::ipset (pf::inline::get_technique)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) ERROR: [mac:unknown] Can't bind : 
IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connexion refusée
(pf::iplog::_get_lease_from_omapi)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) WARN: [mac:unknown] Unable to match MAC 
address to IP '192.168.12.10' (pf::iplog::ip2mac)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:unknown] Instantiate profile 
default (pf::Portal::ProfileFactory::_from_profile)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) ERROR: [mac:unknown] Can't bind : 
IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connexion refusée
(pf::iplog::_get_lease_from_omapi)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) WARN: [mac:unknown] Unable to match MAC 
address to IP '192.168.12.10' (pf::iplog::ip2mac)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1771) INFO: [mac:[undef]] Dealing with a endpoint 
/ browser with captive-portal detection capabilities while having a self-signed 
SSL certificate. Using HTTP instead of HTTPS (pf::web::dispatcher::handler)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1771) INFO: [mac:[undef]] Instantiate a new 
iptables modification method. pf::ipset (pf::inline::get_technique)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) ERROR: [mac:0] Can't bind : 
IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connexion refusée
(pf::iplog::_get_lease_from_omapi)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) WARN: [mac:0] Unable to match MAC address to 
IP '192.168.12.10' (pf::iplog::ip2mac)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] Instantiate profile default 
(pf::Portal::ProfileFactory::_from_profile)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) ERROR: [mac:0] Can't bind : 
IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connexion refusée
(pf::iplog::_get_lease_from_omapi)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) WARN: [mac:0] Unable to match MAC address to 
IP '192.168.12.10' (pf::iplog::ip2mac)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] Instantiate profile default 
(pf::Portal::ProfileFactory::_from_profile)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] Updating node user_agent with 
useragent: 'Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 9_2_1 like Mac OS X) 
AppleWebKit/601.1.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/13D15' 
(captiveportal::PacketFence::DynamicRouting::Application::process_user_agent)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] database query failed with: 
Duplicate entry '0' for key 'PRIMARY' (errno: 1062) (pf::db::db_query_execute)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] Static User-Agent lookup data 
initialized (pf::useragent::_init)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] violation not added, MAC 0 is 
invalid! trigger useragent::603 (pf::violation::violation_trigger)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] violation not added, MAC 0 is 
invalid! trigger useragent::111 (pf::violation::violation_trigger)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] violation not added, MAC 0 is 
invalid! trigger useragent::300 (pf::violation::violation_trigger)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] violation not added, MAC 0 is 
invalid! trigger useragent::5 (pf::violation::violation_trigger)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] violation not added, MAC 0 is 
invalid! trigger useragent::100 (pf::violation::violation_trigger)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1544) INFO: [mac:0] Dealing with a endpoint / 
browser with captive-portal detection capabilities while having a self-signed 
SSL certificate. Using HTTP instead of HTTPS (pf::web::dispatcher::handler)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1544) INFO: [mac:0] Instantiate a new iptables 
modification method. pf::ipset (pf::inline::get_technique)




--

Mobile security can be enabling, not merely

Re: [PacketFence-users] PacketFence 6 clear node and user

2016-05-25 Thread PROST pierrick 
Thanks fabrice.

De : Fabrice Durand [mailto:fdur...@inverse.ca]
Envoyé : mercredi 25 mai 2016 14:16
À : packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : Re: [PacketFence-users] PacketFence 6 clear node and user

Hello Pierrick,

yes you can use mysql to clear nodes and users

regards
Fabrice
Le 2016-05-25 05:19, PROST pierrick a écrit :
Hi everyone,
I made a lot of test and i would like to clear the node and user base and I 
found nothing on documentation. I need to do that on mysql ?


Regards

Pierrick




--

Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who

bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM

restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the

apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!

https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j




___

PacketFence-users mailing list

PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users



--

Fabrice Durand

fdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  
www.inverse.ca

Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org)
--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt / Packetfence give me your feedbacks boys !

2016-05-25 Thread PROST pierrick 
Thanks, after reading Frederic 's response (from neptune) and yours .. and if 
we want a A/B/G/N/AC access point, microtik wAP AC could be a good solution.

Thanks a lot !

De : Antoine Amacher [mailto:aamac...@inverse.ca]
Envoyé : mercredi 25 mai 2016 14:53
À : packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : Re: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt / Packetfence give 
me your feedbacks boys !

Hello Pierrick,

we did test it with an Ubiquiti Nanostation N2. The switch module in 
PacketFence is Hostapd, so if you manage to have another device where you can 
install it, you could always give a try.

For Mikrotik it should work on CAPsMAN enabled APs, tested on v6.18.

Thank you

On 05/25/2016 06:32 AM, PROST pierrick wrote:
I looked to microtik,  "wAP AC" are very interesting!  Have to test you 
packetFence with these models? Version of routerOS  is compatible ?


Pierrick

De : PROST pierrick
Envoyé : mercredi 25 mai 2016 11:13
À : 
packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : RE: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt / Packetfence give 
me your feedbacks boys !

Hy antoine, thanks for this feedback, witch ubiquiti device have you try ?


Pierrick

De : Antoine Amacher [mailto:aamac...@inverse.ca]
Envoyé : mardi 24 mai 2016 15:21
À : 
packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : Re: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt / Packetfence give 
me your feedbacks boys !

Hello Pierrick,

This was tested only with Ubiquity on our side, you can try to do it on other 
devices but we can't confirm that it will work.

Thanks
On 05/24/2016 08:38 AM, PROST pierrick wrote:
Hi everyone,

We want buy and deploy packet fence with out of band configuration We are 
looking for new wifi device with OpenWRT 14.07 compatibility to math with this 
documentation
http://packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_OpenWrt-Hostapd_Quick_Install_Guide.html

Have you some feedbacks ? Ubiquity ? Linksys ? Microtik ?

Have good day !


Pierrick Prost

CNRS




--

Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who

bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM

restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the

apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!

https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j




___

PacketFence-users mailing list

PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


--

Antoine Amacher

aamac...@inverse.ca  ::  +1.514.447.4918 *130  ::  
www.inverse.ca

Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and 
PacketFence (www.packetfence.org)




--

Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who

bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM

restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the

apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!

https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j




___

PacketFence-users mailing list

PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users



--

Antoine Amacher

aamac...@inverse.ca  ::  +1.514.447.4918 *130  ::  
www.inverse.ca

Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and 
PacketFence (www.packetfence.org)
--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt / Packetfence give me your feedbacks boys !

2016-05-25 Thread Antoine Amacher 

Hello Pierrick,

we did test it with an Ubiquiti Nanostation N2. The switch module in 
PacketFence is Hostapd, so if you manage to have another device where 
you can install it, you could always give a try.


For Mikrotik it should work on CAPsMAN enabled APs, tested on v6.18.

Thank you


On 05/25/2016 06:32 AM, PROST pierrick wrote:


I looked to microtik,  “wAP AC” are very interesting!  Have to test 
you packetFence with these models? Version of routerOS  is compatible ?


Pierrick

*De :*PROST pierrick
*Envoyé :* mercredi 25 mai 2016 11:13
*À :* packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
*Objet :* RE: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt / 
Packetfence give me your feedbacks boys !


Hy antoine, thanks for this feedback, witch ubiquiti device have you try ?

Pierrick

*De :*Antoine Amacher [mailto:aamac...@inverse.ca]
*Envoyé :* mardi 24 mai 2016 15:21
*À :* packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net 

*Objet :* Re: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt / 
Packetfence give me your feedbacks boys !


Hello Pierrick,

This was tested only with Ubiquity on our side, you can try to do it 
on other devices but we can't confirm that it will work.


Thanks

On 05/24/2016 08:38 AM, PROST pierrick wrote:

Hi everyone,

We want buy and deploy packet fence with out of band
configuration…. We are looking for new wifi device with OpenWRT
14.07 compatibility to math with this documentation


http://packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_OpenWrt-Hostapd_Quick_Install_Guide.html

Have you some feedbacks ? Ubiquity ? Linksys ? Microtik ?

Have good day !

Pierrick Prost

CNRS




--

Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who

bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM

restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the

apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!

https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j



___

PacketFence-users mailing list

PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net


https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

--
Antoine Amacher
aamac...@inverse.ca    ::  +1.514.447.4918 *130  
::www.inverse.ca 
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu ) and 
PacketFence (www.packetfence.org )


--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j


___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


--
Antoine Amacher
aamac...@inverse.ca  ::  +1.514.447.4918 *130  ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(www.packetfence.org)

--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt / Packetfence give me your feedbacks boys !

2016-05-25 Thread Frederic Hermann 
We have some unifi AP AC PRO, running on openwrt 14.07 when dual-band is 
required. AFAIK it's the only unifi AC we've got. 

It's working, but those devices are more difficult to deal with: 

* If you use VLAN (and you should), you have to configure the internal 
switching device with all your (tagged) VLAN, including for the management. The 
internal switching device cannot deal with both tagged and untagged VLAN (it's 
a restriction/feature of the driver) 
* It is composed of 2 radio devices (for 2.4 and 5 GHz), so you have to change 
the packetfence hostapd module to deal with deauthentication on both devices. 

- Mail original -

> De: "PROST pierrick" 
> À: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Envoyé: Mercredi 25 Mai 2016 11:11:56
> Objet: Re: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt /
> Packetfence give me your feedbacks boys !

> Thanks for four feedback Frederic. Have you try the Ubiquiti Unifi AC
> serie ?

> Pierrick

> De : Frederic Hermann [mailto:frederic.herm...@neptune.fr]
> Envoyé : mardi 24 mai 2016 15:38
> À : packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Objet : Re: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt /
> Packetfence give me your feedbacks boys !

> We successfully use packetfence with Ubiquity devices (mostly unifi,
> running with openwrt 14.07) and Mikrotik devices (with RouterOS
> 6.35).

> If you go with Mikrotik, that would be an error to use openwrt, IMHO,
> as RouterOS provides probably more features you will need.

> The learning curve for mikrotik management can be shallow, however.

> Regards,

> --
> Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees
> who
> bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of
> MDM
> restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only
> the
> apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data
> untouched!
> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
> ___
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] 802.11x autoregister

2016-05-25 Thread Fabrice Durand 

Hello Jan-Patrick,

do you have the log when you receive the radius request ?

Regards
Fabrice

Le 2016-05-24 12:29, Jan-Patrick Perisse a écrit :

Hello people,
I have ZEN 6.0.1 installed and I am currently testing.
I don’t want people on the network to get to the portal for 
registration. So, I have setup a config to auto register anyone that 
can authenticate on AD. Besides that, I will setup printers and other 
devices to auto register via MAC.
My setup is working properly for wired workstation (although they 
re-authenticate every minute and I can’t get rid of it).
But for wireless, I have WPA2 Enterprise on unifi and PF doesn’t seem 
to apply the rule.

Thank you.

[etherneteap]
filter = connection_type
operator = is
value = Ethernet-EAP

[reg:etherneteap]
scope = AutoRegister
role = default

[wetherneteap]
filter = connection_type
operator = is
value = Wireless-802.11-EAP

[reg:wetherneteap]
scope = AutoRegister
role = default

You can see it’s the same rule but LOG says:
For wireless
May 24 12:21:36 httpd.aaa(14492) DEBUG: [mac:c0:f2:fb:b4:d7:04] 
instantiating new pf::access_filter::vlan (pf::access_filter::new)
May 24 12:21:36 httpd.aaa(14492) DEBUG: [mac:c0:f2:fb:b4:d7:04] No 
rule matched for scope AutoRegister (pf::access_filter::test)


For wired
May 24 12:24:54 httpd.aaa(14492) DEBUG: [mac:e8:40:f2:3a:b1:77] 
instantiating new pf::access_filter::vlan (pf::access_filter::new)
May 24 12:24:54 httpd.aaa(14492) INFO: [mac:e8:40:f2:3a:b1:77] Match 
rule reg:etherneteap (pf::access_filter::test)
May 24 12:24:54 httpd.aaa(14492) INFO: [mac:e8:40:f2:3a:b1:77] 
Instantiate profile default (pf::Portal::ProfileFactory::_from_profile)
May 24 12:24:54 httpd.aaa(14492) DEBUG: [mac:e8:40:f2:3a:b1:77] 
instantiating new pf::Portal::Profile object (pf::Portal::Profile::new)
May 24 12:24:54 httpd.aaa(14492) DEBUG: [mac:e8:40:f2:3a:b1:77] 
instantiating new pf::access_filter::vlan (pf::access_filter::new)
May 24 12:24:54 httpd.aaa(14492) DEBUG: [mac:e8:40:f2:3a:b1:77] No 
engine found for NodeInfoForAutoReg (pf::access_filter::test)




JAN-PATRICK PÉRISSÉ
Diretor técnico
www.aeon.com.br   +55 21 2705-3139






--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j


___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


--
Fabrice Durand
fdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org)

--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] PacketFence 6 clear node and user

2016-05-25 Thread Fabrice Durand 

Hello Pierrick,

yes you can use mysql to clear nodes and users

regards
Fabrice

Le 2016-05-25 05:19, PROST pierrick a écrit :


Hi everyone,

I made a lot of test and i would like to clear the node and user base 
and I found nothing on documentation. I need to do that on mysql ?


Regards

Pierrick



--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j


___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


--
Fabrice Durand
fdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org)

--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] 0 mac adresse with iphone Unable to match MAC address to IP

2016-05-25 Thread Fabrice Durand 

Hello Pierrick,

can you enable OMAPI (configuration -> OMAPI) and retry ?

Regards
Fabrice


Le 2016-05-25 07:08, PROST pierrick a écrit :


Hi everyone,

I’m continu to testing captive portal (inline configuration), we have 
problem with iphone 4S (ios 9.3.2), there is log file . Someone as an 
idea ?


Regards

May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1542) INFO: [mac:38:59:f9:14:62:37] 
Instantiate a new iptables modification method. pf::ipset 
(pf::inline::get_technique)


May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) ERROR: [mac:unknown] Can't bind : 
IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connexion refusée


(pf::iplog::_get_lease_from_omapi)

May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) WARN: [mac:unknown] Unable to match 
MAC address to IP '192.168.12.10' (pf::iplog::ip2mac)


May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:unknown] Instantiate 
profile default (pf::Portal::ProfileFactory::_from_profile)


May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) ERROR: [mac:unknown] Can't bind : 
IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connexion refusée


(pf::iplog::_get_lease_from_omapi)

May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) WARN: [mac:unknown] Unable to match 
MAC address to IP '192.168.12.10' (pf::iplog::ip2mac)


May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1771) INFO: [mac:[undef]] Dealing with a 
endpoint / browser with captive-portal detection capabilities while 
having a self-signed SSL certificate. Using HTTP instead of HTTPS 
(pf::web::dispatcher::handler)


May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1771) INFO: [mac:[undef]] Instantiate a 
new iptables modification method. pf::ipset (pf::inline::get_technique)


May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) ERROR: [mac:0] Can't bind : 
IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connexion refusée


(pf::iplog::_get_lease_from_omapi)

May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) WARN: [mac:0] Unable to match MAC 
address to IP '192.168.12.10' (pf::iplog::ip2mac)


May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] Instantiate profile 
default (pf::Portal::ProfileFactory::_from_profile)


May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) ERROR: [mac:0] Can't bind : 
IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connexion refusée


(pf::iplog::_get_lease_from_omapi)

May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) WARN: [mac:0] Unable to match MAC 
address to IP '192.168.12.10' (pf::iplog::ip2mac)


May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] Instantiate profile 
default (pf::Portal::ProfileFactory::_from_profile)


May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] Updating node 
user_agent with useragent: 'Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 9_2_1 
like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/601.1.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/13D15' 
(captiveportal::PacketFence::DynamicRouting::Application::process_user_agent)


May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] database query failed 
with: Duplicate entry '0' for key 'PRIMARY' (errno: 1062) 
(pf::db::db_query_execute)


May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] Static User-Agent 
lookup data initialized (pf::useragent::_init)


May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] violation not added, 
MAC 0 is invalid! trigger useragent::603 
(pf::violation::violation_trigger)


May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] violation not added, 
MAC 0 is invalid! trigger useragent::111 
(pf::violation::violation_trigger)


May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] violation not added, 
MAC 0 is invalid! trigger useragent::300 
(pf::violation::violation_trigger)


May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] violation not added, 
MAC 0 is invalid! trigger useragent::5 (pf::violation::violation_trigger)


May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] violation not added, 
MAC 0 is invalid! trigger useragent::100 
(pf::violation::violation_trigger)


May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1544) INFO: [mac:0] Dealing with a 
endpoint / browser with captive-portal detection capabilities while 
having a self-signed SSL certificate. Using HTTP instead of HTTPS 
(pf::web::dispatcher::handler)


May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1544) INFO: [mac:0] Instantiate a new 
iptables modification method. pf::ipset (pf::inline::get_technique)




--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j


___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


--
Fabrice Durand
fdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org)

--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices

[PacketFence-users] 0 mac adresse with iphone Unable to match MAC address to IP

2016-05-25 Thread PROST pierrick 
Hi everyone,
I'm continu to testing captive portal (inline configuration), we have problem 
with iphone 4S (ios 9.3.2), there is log file . Someone as an idea ?


Regards

May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1542) INFO: [mac:38:59:f9:14:62:37] Instantiate a 
new iptables modification method. pf::ipset (pf::inline::get_technique)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) ERROR: [mac:unknown] Can't bind : 
IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connexion refusée
(pf::iplog::_get_lease_from_omapi)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) WARN: [mac:unknown] Unable to match MAC 
address to IP '192.168.12.10' (pf::iplog::ip2mac)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:unknown] Instantiate profile 
default (pf::Portal::ProfileFactory::_from_profile)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) ERROR: [mac:unknown] Can't bind : 
IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connexion refusée
(pf::iplog::_get_lease_from_omapi)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) WARN: [mac:unknown] Unable to match MAC 
address to IP '192.168.12.10' (pf::iplog::ip2mac)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1771) INFO: [mac:[undef]] Dealing with a endpoint 
/ browser with captive-portal detection capabilities while having a self-signed 
SSL certificate. Using HTTP instead of HTTPS (pf::web::dispatcher::handler)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1771) INFO: [mac:[undef]] Instantiate a new 
iptables modification method. pf::ipset (pf::inline::get_technique)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) ERROR: [mac:0] Can't bind : 
IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connexion refusée
(pf::iplog::_get_lease_from_omapi)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) WARN: [mac:0] Unable to match MAC address to 
IP '192.168.12.10' (pf::iplog::ip2mac)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] Instantiate profile default 
(pf::Portal::ProfileFactory::_from_profile)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) ERROR: [mac:0] Can't bind : 
IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connexion refusée
(pf::iplog::_get_lease_from_omapi)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) WARN: [mac:0] Unable to match MAC address to 
IP '192.168.12.10' (pf::iplog::ip2mac)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] Instantiate profile default 
(pf::Portal::ProfileFactory::_from_profile)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] Updating node user_agent with 
useragent: 'Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 9_2_1 like Mac OS X) 
AppleWebKit/601.1.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/13D15' 
(captiveportal::PacketFence::DynamicRouting::Application::process_user_agent)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] database query failed with: 
Duplicate entry '0' for key 'PRIMARY' (errno: 1062) (pf::db::db_query_execute)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] Static User-Agent lookup data 
initialized (pf::useragent::_init)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] violation not added, MAC 0 is 
invalid! trigger useragent::603 (pf::violation::violation_trigger)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] violation not added, MAC 0 is 
invalid! trigger useragent::111 (pf::violation::violation_trigger)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] violation not added, MAC 0 is 
invalid! trigger useragent::300 (pf::violation::violation_trigger)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] violation not added, MAC 0 is 
invalid! trigger useragent::5 (pf::violation::violation_trigger)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1539) INFO: [mac:0] violation not added, MAC 0 is 
invalid! trigger useragent::100 (pf::violation::violation_trigger)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1544) INFO: [mac:0] Dealing with a endpoint / 
browser with captive-portal detection capabilities while having a self-signed 
SSL certificate. Using HTTP instead of HTTPS (pf::web::dispatcher::handler)
May 25 13:01:03 httpd.portal(1544) INFO: [mac:0] Instantiate a new iptables 
modification method. pf::ipset (pf::inline::get_technique)
--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt / Packetfence give me your feedbacks boys !

2016-05-25 Thread PROST pierrick 
I looked to microtik,  "wAP AC" are very interesting!  Have to test you 
packetFence with these models? Version of routerOS  is compatible ?


Pierrick

De : PROST pierrick
Envoyé : mercredi 25 mai 2016 11:13
À : packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : RE: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt / Packetfence give 
me your feedbacks boys !

Hy antoine, thanks for this feedback, witch ubiquiti device have you try ?


Pierrick

De : Antoine Amacher [mailto:aamac...@inverse.ca]
Envoyé : mardi 24 mai 2016 15:21
À : 
packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : Re: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt / Packetfence give 
me your feedbacks boys !

Hello Pierrick,

This was tested only with Ubiquity on our side, you can try to do it on other 
devices but we can't confirm that it will work.

Thanks
On 05/24/2016 08:38 AM, PROST pierrick wrote:
Hi everyone,

We want buy and deploy packet fence with out of band configuration We are 
looking for new wifi device with OpenWRT 14.07 compatibility to math with this 
documentation
http://packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_OpenWrt-Hostapd_Quick_Install_Guide.html

Have you some feedbacks ? Ubiquity ? Linksys ? Microtik ?

Have good day !


Pierrick Prost

CNRS



--

Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who

bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM

restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the

apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!

https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j



___

PacketFence-users mailing list

PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


--

Antoine Amacher

aamac...@inverse.ca  ::  +1.514.447.4918 *130  ::  
www.inverse.ca

Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and 
PacketFence (www.packetfence.org)
--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt / Packetfence give me your feedbacks boys !

2016-05-25 Thread PROST pierrick 
Hy antoine, thanks for this feedback, witch ubiquiti device have you try ?


Pierrick

De : Antoine Amacher [mailto:aamac...@inverse.ca]
Envoyé : mardi 24 mai 2016 15:21
À : packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : Re: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt / Packetfence give 
me your feedbacks boys !

Hello Pierrick,

This was tested only with Ubiquity on our side, you can try to do it on other 
devices but we can't confirm that it will work.

Thanks
On 05/24/2016 08:38 AM, PROST pierrick wrote:
Hi everyone,

We want buy and deploy packet fence with out of band configuration We are 
looking for new wifi device with OpenWRT 14.07 compatibility to math with this 
documentation
http://packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_OpenWrt-Hostapd_Quick_Install_Guide.html

Have you some feedbacks ? Ubiquity ? Linksys ? Microtik ?

Have good day !


Pierrick Prost

CNRS




--

Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who

bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM

restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the

apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!

https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j




___

PacketFence-users mailing list

PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net

https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users



--

Antoine Amacher

aamac...@inverse.ca  ::  +1.514.447.4918 *130  ::  
www.inverse.ca

Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and 
PacketFence (www.packetfence.org)
--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

[PacketFence-users] PacketFence 6 clear node and user

2016-05-25 Thread PROST pierrick 
Hi everyone,
I made a lot of test and i would like to clear the node and user base and I 
found nothing on documentation. I need to do that on mysql ?


Regards

Pierrick
--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

Re: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt / Packetfence give me your feedbacks boys !

2016-05-25 Thread PROST pierrick 
Thanks for four feedback Frederic. Have you try the Ubiquiti Unifi AC serie ?


Pierrick

De : Frederic Hermann [mailto:frederic.herm...@neptune.fr]
Envoyé : mardi 24 mai 2016 15:38
À : packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : Re: [PacketFence-users] Best wifi device for openWrt / Packetfence give 
me your feedbacks boys !


We successfully use packetfence with Ubiquity devices (mostly unifi, running 
with openwrt 14.07) and Mikrotik devices (with RouterOS 6.35).

If you go with Mikrotik, that would be an error to use openwrt, IMHO, as 
RouterOS provides probably more features you will need.

The learning curve for mikrotik management can be shallow, however.

Regards,



--
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users