It works perfectly, thanks!
Il 04/08/2017 14:59, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users ha scritto:
Hello Cristian,
you can do that:
[smartphones_by_devclass]
filter = node_info.device_class
operator = is
value = Smartphones/PDAs/Tablets
[employees_ssid]
filter = ssid
operator = is
value =
Hello Cristian,
you can do that:
[smartphones_by_devclass]
filter = node_info.device_class
operator = is
value = Smartphones/PDAs/Tablets
[employees_ssid]
filter = ssid
operator = is
value = aprapfdot1x
[set_smartphone_role:smartphones_by_devclass_ssid]
scope = RegisteredRole
role =
I saw one can set a role using a "violation" but this is not a real
violation. The role is set but the device is put into the isolation vlan
if I set "Re-evealuate". The violation should set the role, "self-close"
and reevaluate.
Anyway I cannot restrict the violation to only one SSID like I
Hello Ludovic,
I’ve tried with Win10, tested with both IP (I know, if I test the first
reachable is not correct…) I’ve leaved Vlan Enforce due to incopatibility of
switches, so I’m in inline mode.
I will try to raise timeout to 90 secs and to open it by hand in new tab.
Later I will recap
Don’t know:
today after registration all traffic pass correctly….except GIF file (HTTP
local to PF node) and DNS requests…..
I need a hand or I will die configuring it….
Da: Ludovic Zammit [mailto:lzam...@inverse.ca]
Inviato: giovedì 3 agosto 2017 19.40
A:
