Hi Team
Any chance of a yes or no answer to this one please?
Kind Regards
Simon
Sent from my Galaxy
Original message
From: Simon Sutcliffe
Date: 10/12/2021 13:03 (GMT+00:00)
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: lmarc...@akamai.com
Subject: Question about the
Good afternoon, everyone.
We have a very light install of packet fence. We are using it as an isolation
network for unpaid subscribers.
I want to host a simple webpage on the PF server to "advertise and announce"
the reason the customer is unable to use the internet services at that time.
Good afternoon, everyone.
We have a very light install of packet fence. We are using it as an isolation
network for unpaid subscribers.
I want to host a simple webpage on the PF server to "advertise and announce"
the reason the customer is unable to use the internet services at that time.
It´s NOT
Le lun. 13 déc. 2021 à 15:29, Erich Flynn via PacketFence-users <
packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> a écrit :
> Can we confirm PacketFence is not subject to CVE-2021-44228?
> Chat
> Spaces1
> Meet
> New meetingMy meetings
> ___
>
Can we confirm PacketFence is not subject to CVE-2021-44228?
Chat
Spaces1
Meet
New meetingMy meetings
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
Hello,
I'm trying to configure CLI access for admins via PF. I'm so far able to
make the admins login to the switch CLI, however when they try to enter
enable mode they receive "% Error in Authentication" message.
I tried and checked the radius.log which shows a successful authentication.
I have
Dear Team,
Any update on the below query?
Regards
Arun
Information Security Analyst
Networks & Security - FT
Phone: +91 9750831454
P Please don't print this email unless you really need. Save Papers, Save
Trees, Save Earth.
[cid:image011.png@01D54BB1.75016D20]
[Description: Description:
