Re: [packman] kim package

Le 07/01/2016 11:56, Olaf Hering a écrit : I have replaced the pkg content with a _link to OBS. Its one of the packages which is not strictly needed to be built in packman. yes. I didn't noticed at first that it was pulled from Packman (by zypper in kim) thanks jdd

Re: [packman] kim package

On Wed, Jan 06, jdd wrote: > I want to inform you than the package "kim" (Kde Image Management) from > packman is briken - that is it do not fit plasma5 because the change in > service places > > the obs repo kde:extra have a fixed one I have replaced the pkg content with a _link to OBS. Its

[packman] duplicate packages to remove from PMBS because they are in OBS

There are some applications in PMBS which are also available from OBS. While some do require ffmpeg/etc for building, others are just still in PMBS for historical reasons. Examples are Extras/kim, Extras/freeswitch Any objection to remove such packages or enable them only for SLE/Evergreen?

Re: [packman] duplicate packages to remove from PMBS because they are in OBS

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Olaf Hering wrote: > Any objection to remove such packages or enable them only for > SLE/Evergreen? Ideally these packages should just _link to OBS. I think they should be linked and maintained in OBS, the fixes for SLEs also come to OBS.

Re: [packman] [PM] transcode 1.2.0-3.1 (openSUSE_Leap 42.1/x86_64)

On 1/7/16, Martin Hofius wrote: > Thank you for your fast reaction... > Greetings > Martin > > Am 7. Januar 2016 10:29:38 MEZ, schrieb Dave Plater > : >>On 1/6/16, Martin Hofius wrote: >>> Hello Packman-Team, >>> >>> a