Re: [packman] broadcom-wl vs. kernel-4.8

Hi Bruno, On Sun, 09 Oct 2016, 19:26:12 +0200, Bruno Friedmann wrote: > On vendredi, 7 octobre 2016 11.44:26 h CEST Manfred Hollstein wrote: > > Moin, > > > > On Fri, 07 Oct 2016, 11:17:06 +0200, Manfred Hollstein wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > > > > apparently the function cfg80211_scan_done has

Re: [packman] broadcom-wl vs. kernel-4.8

On vendredi, 7 octobre 2016 11.44:26 h CEST Manfred Hollstein wrote: > Moin, > > On Fri, 07 Oct 2016, 11:17:06 +0200, Manfred Hollstein wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > apparently the function cfg80211_scan_done has changed in kernel 4.8. On > > the Debian bugtracker there is a report with a proper p

Re: [packman] broadcom-wl vs. kernel-4.8

Moin, On Fri, 07 Oct 2016, 11:44:26 +0200, Manfred Hollstein wrote: > Moin, > > On Fri, 07 Oct 2016, 11:17:06 +0200, Manfred Hollstein wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > apparently the function cfg80211_scan_done has changed in kernel 4.8. On > > the Debian bugtracker there is a report with a proper p

Re: [packman] broadcom-wl vs. kernel-4.8

Moin, On Fri, 07 Oct 2016, 11:17:06 +0200, Manfred Hollstein wrote: > Hi there, > > apparently the function cfg80211_scan_done has changed in kernel 4.8. On > the Debian bugtracker there is a report with a proper patch to fix the > problem at > >

[packman] broadcom-wl vs. kernel-4.8

Hi there, apparently the function cfg80211_scan_done has changed in kernel 4.8. On the Debian bugtracker there is a report with a proper patch to fix the problem at Can someone please take a look at it and apply it so we get a working