Re: [packman] [PM] bibletime 2.7.3-1.pm.1.1 (openSUSE 11.2/i586)
Hallo Detlef, leider hat sich da gar nichts getan... für OS 11.2 steht da immer noch die Version 2.7.3 (siehe hier: http://packman.links2linux.de/package/bibletime/184194 ) - und soweit ich sehe, läuft die nicht mit SWORD 1.6.2. (die mir packman für OS 11.2 ausschließlich anbietet), sondern nur mit SWORD 1.6.1 (was da aber nur für OS 11.0 noch steht). Was ist da passiert? In den Abhängigkeiten scheint es ja richtig zu stehen, aber die kann ich nur auflösen, wenn ich irgendwo das passende Paket finde. Gruß Martin Am Sonntag, 5. Dezember 2010 20:36:42 schrieb Detlef Reichelt: Moin Martin, Am Sun, 5 Dec 2010 19:41:52 +0100 schrieb Martin Hofius mart...@hofius-online.com: Vielleiicht könntest Du den Build noch mal anstossen? done, sollte bald online sein ;) Detlef ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Deluge 1.3.1
Hello to all. I think it is necessary to upgrade deluge version to 1.3.1 (1.3.0 is in the repo now). I have reproduced this bug on opensuse 11.3 64bit. http://www.mail-archive.com/deluge-...@googlegroups.com/msg01783.html They are say that it is fixed upstream. Thanks and keep up the good work. ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] [PM] ardour2 2.8-0.pm.1 (openSUSE 11.1/i586)
Am Dienstag, 7. Dezember 2010 schrieb Bruno Canning: Hi Toni, I've got a problem with ardour2. There hasn't been a package built since openSUSE 11.1 was released and 11.3 has been out for a few months now. I notice that you are the packager for ardour2, so that's why I'm writing to you today. I appreciate that you may be busy (or you might have just forgotten about this) but is there any chance of building an up to date package for 11.3? ardour2 and jack are no longer provided. The reason I dropped those packages from the packman repo is simple: http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/2008-December/022310.html you should read the whole thread :) and as long as such people can post such messages on official mailing-lists, and none of the audio-gurus there (I've packaged most of their programms for openSuSE) does nothing against or bann such persons I have no interest at all to provide such packages. Many thanks in advance and warm regards, Bruno -- have fun Toni ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] [PM] ardour2 2.8-0.pm.1 (openSUSE 11.1/i586)
Hi, On Tuesday 07 December 2010 22:50:16 Toni wrote: The reason I dropped those packages from the packman repo is simple: http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-dev/2008-December/022310. html you should read the whole thread :) and as long as such people can post such messages on official mailing-lists, and none of the audio-gurus there (I've packaged most of their programms for openSuSE) does nothing against or bann such persons I have no interest at all to provide such packages. I appreciate your feelings on that but sometimes you have to rise above such stupidity. The actions of ignorant posters on a mailing list are causing you to deny others, who sincerely appreciate your efforts, technology which is useful to them. Perhaps there should be written in big letters somewhere that the use of the Packman repository requires a degree of skill and understanding in order to manage any conflicts or unexpected behaviour that arises from using the packages. My two euros. Regards, Neil Darlow ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
