[packman] [PMBS] SR 310 Multimedia/gpac

2012-11-01 Diskussionsfäden PMBS
New submit request 310 on gpac by marguerite
https://pmbs.links2linux.org/request/show/310

[Final]update to 0.5.0. fix a lot of things. can be used by x264 now.

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman


[packman] [PMBS] SR 311 Essentials/x264

2012-11-01 Diskussionsfäden PMBS
New submit request 311 on x264 by marguerite
https://pmbs.links2linux.org/request/show/311

[please accept after gpac] build with gpac, ffmpeg and ffms2 for 
11.4/12.1/12.2/Tumbleweed/Factory. it requires packages' aggravations or path 
repository=openSUSE_XX project=Multimedia/ for those targets in 
Essentials' meta.

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman


Re: [packman] [PMBS] SR 311 Essentials/x264

2012-11-01 Diskussionsfäden Manfred Tremmel
Am Donnerstag, 1. November 2012, 11:42:53 schrieb PMBS:
 New submit request 311 on x264 by marguerite
 https://pmbs.links2linux.org/request/show/311
 
 [please accept after gpac] build with gpac, ffmpeg and ffms2 for
 11.4/12.1/12.2/Tumbleweed/Factory. it requires packages' aggravations
 or path repository=openSUSE_XX project=Multimedia/ for those
 targets in Essentials' meta.

I'm not sure, if ths cycling dependency (ffmpeg needs x264 to build, 
x264 needs ffmpeg to build) is such a good idea. PMBs shouldn't have a 
problem when both packages are build once, but whenever we add a new 
Build-Target, it will fail to solve dependencies.

Therefore I've allways build x264 binary without ffmpeg support. The 
only clean way to solve this is, to split x264 into two package one for 
the libs and devel package only without dependency to ffmpeg and one 
only to build the x264 executeable with ffmpeg dependency.

-- 
Machs gut| http://www.iivs.de/schwinde/buerger/tremmel/

Manfred  | http://packman.links2linux.de/

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman


[packman] [PMBS] SR 312 Essentials/rtmpdump

2012-11-01 Diskussionsfäden PMBS
New submit request 312 on rtmpdump by marguerite
https://pmbs.links2linux.org/request/show/312

update 2.4.git20121102

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman


Re: [packman] [PMBS] SR 308 Multimedia/recorditnow

2012-11-01 Diskussionsfäden Mariusz Fik
Dnia środa, 31 października 2012 20:28:14 PMBS pisze:
 New submit request 308 on recorditnow by marguerite
 https://pmbs.links2linux.org/request/show/308

 new package. it's old, but it is the only worked desktop screen recording
 tool under KDE.
It fails for openSUSE  12.2 because recordmydesktop is available in OSS
repository only for openSUSE = 12.2. We should link it from OBS (GNOME:Apps)
and build it only for openSUSE  12.2.
--
Pozdrawiam / Best regards,
Mariusz Fik
openSUSE Community Member
GPG: 5FCE 7241 B3B9 32FD 455B C30E 42D6 6C88 9E83 7C3D

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] [PMBS] SR 311 Essentials/x264

2012-11-01 Diskussionsfäden Pascal Bleser
On 2012-11-01 17:05:03 (+0100), Manfred Tremmel manf...@links2linux.de wrote:
 Am Donnerstag, 1. November 2012, 11:42:53 schrieb PMBS:
  New submit request 311 on x264 by marguerite
  https://pmbs.links2linux.org/request/show/311

  [please accept after gpac] build with gpac, ffmpeg and ffms2 for
  11.4/12.1/12.2/Tumbleweed/Factory. it requires packages' aggravations
  or path repository=openSUSE_XX project=Multimedia/ for those
  targets in Essentials' meta.

 I'm not sure, if ths cycling dependency (ffmpeg needs x264 to build, 
 x264 needs ffmpeg to build) is such a good idea. PMBs shouldn't have a 
 problem when both packages are build once, but whenever we add a new 
 Build-Target, it will fail to solve dependencies.

 Therefore I've allways build x264 binary without ffmpeg support. The 
 only clean way to solve this is, to split x264 into two package one for 
 the libs and devel package only without dependency to ffmpeg and one 
 only to build the x264 executeable with ffmpeg dependency.

Done, we now have libx264 and x264 packages in Essentials.

The x264 binary doesn't use the shared lib, to avoid any cycles
there, and transitive dependencies with ffmpeg.

We should just take are of trying to keep libx264 and x264 in
sync.

cheers
-- 
  -o) Pascal Bleser
  /\\ http://opensuse.org -- we haz green
 _\_v http://fosdem.org   -- we haz conf


pgpT2cn7ZSe9r.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] [PMBS] SR 311 Essentials/x264

2012-11-01 Diskussionsfäden Pascal Bleser
On 2012-11-01 11:42:53 (+), PMBS p...@links2linux.org wrote:
 New submit request 311 on x264 by marguerite
 https://pmbs.links2linux.org/request/show/311

 [please accept after gpac] build with gpac, ffmpeg and ffms2 for 
 11.4/12.1/12.2/Tumbleweed/Factory. it requires packages' aggravations or 
 path repository=openSUSE_XX project=Multimedia/ for those targets in 
 Essentials' meta.

Marguerite, could you please submit the change again?

Now that x264 and libx264 are separate, we don't run into cycles
with ffmpeg.

So that makes x264 buildrequire gpac ?
Then we need to move gpac from Multimedia to Essentials.
(Essentials may not depend on anything, so we don't aggregate
into it, but we can just move a package from Multimedia to
Essentials).

cheers
-- 
  -o) Pascal Bleser
  /\\ http://opensuse.org -- we haz green
 _\_v http://fosdem.org   -- we haz conf


pgpoGSyL1xOxg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman