Re: [packman] Handbrake - Latest version?

2017-02-14 Diskussionsfäden Olaf Hering 
Am Montag, den 13.02.2017, 20:20 +0100 schrieb Pascal Bleser:
> 2017-02-13 14:28 GMT+01:00 Jörg Lorenzen :
> [...]
> > I think the patched libbluray can be deleted from PMBS because
> > Handbrake now builds his own static libbluray,
> > I don't know if there is any other package that requires a patched
> > version.
> Indeed, it's disabled

A newer libbluray is still needed for SLE_12. Just disabling it does
not wipe the binaries, which I already did yesterday morning.

I think this and alot of other packages which are now used only for
SLE_12 should get the A_sle12 prefix in the package name.

Olaf

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] Handbrake - Latest version?

2017-02-13 Diskussionsfäden Pascal Bleser 
2017-02-13 14:28 GMT+01:00 Jörg Lorenzen :
[...]
> I think the patched libbluray can be deleted from PMBS because Handbrake now
> builds his own static libbluray,
> I don't know if there is any other package that requires a patched version.

Indeed, it's disabled

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] Handbrake - Latest version?

2017-02-13 Diskussionsfäden Jörg Lorenzen 

Am 12.02.2017 um 15:29 schrieb Pascal Bleser:

2017-02-12 13:39 GMT+01:00 Olaf Hering :
[...]

Do  you  hard it still on the radar?

I just submitted a build where handbrake builds libbluray on its own, as static.
I'll send a cr to revert the patch on the package on multimedia:libs
(and packman, it's _link'ed there) to avoid spreading that
incompatibility to the stock libbluray package, as handbrake seems to
be the only piece of software that needs it.

As libbluray barely ever gets new releases, I think that's the better
approach, in hindsight.

cheers,
Pascal

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman


Hi,

I think the patched libbluray can be deleted from PMBS because Handbrake 
now builds his own static libbluray,

I don't know if there is any other package that requires a patched version.

Greetings,
Jörg

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] Handbrake - Latest version?

2017-02-12 Diskussionsfäden Pascal Bleser 
2017-02-12 13:39 GMT+01:00 Olaf Hering :
[...]
> Do  you  hard it still on the radar?

I just submitted a build where handbrake builds libbluray on its own, as static.
I'll send a cr to revert the patch on the package on multimedia:libs
(and packman, it's _link'ed there) to avoid spreading that
incompatibility to the stock libbluray package, as handbrake seems to
be the only piece of software that needs it.

As libbluray barely ever gets new releases, I think that's the better
approach, in hindsight.

cheers,
Pascal

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] Handbrake - Latest version?

2017-02-12 Diskussionsfäden Olaf Hering 
Am 7. Februar 2017 13:21:16 MEZ schrieb Olaf Hering :
>On Tue, Feb 07, Pascal Bleser wrote:
>
>> Then the better solution would be to make a static build of libbluray
>> into Handbrake, but not sure that is going to work without some heavy
>> patching
>
>Well, until then the latest and greatest is only available in
>Tumbleweed. There is nothing wrong with that.
>Perhaps handbrake links to a special libbluray via rpath.
>
>
>Olaf

Do  you  hard it still on the radar?

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] Handbrake - Latest version?

2017-02-07 Diskussionsfäden Olaf Hering 
On Tue, Feb 07, Pascal Bleser wrote:

> Then the better solution would be to make a static build of libbluray
> into Handbrake, but not sure that is going to work without some heavy
> patching

Well, until then the latest and greatest is only available in
Tumbleweed. There is nothing wrong with that.
Perhaps handbrake links to a special libbluray via rpath.


Olaf


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] Handbrake - Latest version?

2017-02-07 Diskussionsfäden Pascal Bleser 
2017-02-07 11:00 GMT+01:00 Olaf Hering :
> On Thu, Feb 02, Pascal Bleser wrote:
[...]
> Is libbluray ABI compatible with the version that was released with Leap?
> Both share the same SONAME, but given the history of libbluray failures
> its very likely that binaries not built against the new version will
> misbehave.

Sorry Olaf, I misunderstood, you mean the other way around

True.. that might happen indeed...

Then the better solution would be to make a static build of libbluray
into Handbrake, but not sure that is going to work without some heavy
patching

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] Handbrake - Latest version?

2017-02-07 Diskussionsfäden Pascal Bleser 
2017-02-07 11:00 GMT+01:00 Olaf Hering :
> On Thu, Feb 02, Pascal Bleser wrote:
>
>> Having a look at it, but I'm currently stuck because they require a
>> patched libbluray so I have to submit the changes there first.
>
> Is libbluray ABI compatible with the version that was released with Leap?
> Both share the same SONAME, but given the history of libbluray failures
> its very likely that binaries not built against the new version will
> misbehave.

The patch adds six bytes in a struct to expose the "clip_id" which is
then used by Handbrake and hence, one will definitely need to use the
latest libbluray from multimedia:libs or from Essentials at Packman
(which is just a _link to multimedia:libs/libbluray)

Unfortunately, I'm not sure how to enforce that in the package...
Could add a Provides: libbluray+clip_id that is then Required in Handbrake
Or bump up the version artificially even though it's not an upstream
version and Require that explicitly in Handbrake (Requires: libbluray*
>= ...)
Both are ugly..

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] Handbrake - Latest version?

2017-02-07 Diskussionsfäden Olaf Hering 
On Thu, Feb 02, Pascal Bleser wrote:

> Having a look at it, but I'm currently stuck because they require a
> patched libbluray so I have to submit the changes there first.

Is libbluray ABI compatible with the version that was released with Leap?
Both share the same SONAME, but given the history of libbluray failures
its very likely that binaries not built against the new version will
misbehave.

Olaf


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] Handbrake - Latest version?

2017-02-02 Diskussionsfäden Pascal Bleser 
2017-02-01 18:56 GMT+01:00 Jason DeRose :
> Hello, I was curious if packman would be updated to the latest version
> of Handbrake soon? The current version in packman is 0.10.5 which is
> from February 2016. The current release is 1.0.2. The handbrake-unstable
> package is about 3 years old so seemingly abandoned.

Having a look at it, but I'm currently stuck because they require a
patched libbluray so I have to submit the changes there first.

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

[packman] Handbrake - Latest version?

2017-02-01 Diskussionsfäden Jason DeRose 
Hello, I was curious if packman would be updated to the latest version
of Handbrake soon? The current version in packman is 0.10.5 which is
from February 2016. The current release is 1.0.2. The handbrake-unstable
package is about 3 years old so seemingly abandoned.

Thanks very much!

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman