Am Montag, den 13.02.2017, 20:20 +0100 schrieb Pascal Bleser:
> 2017-02-13 14:28 GMT+01:00 Jörg Lorenzen :
> [...]
> > I think the patched libbluray can be deleted from PMBS because
> > Handbrake now builds his own static libbluray,
> > I don't know if there is any other
2017-02-13 14:28 GMT+01:00 Jörg Lorenzen :
[...]
> I think the patched libbluray can be deleted from PMBS because Handbrake now
> builds his own static libbluray,
> I don't know if there is any other package that requires a patched version.
Indeed, it's disabled
Am 12.02.2017 um 15:29 schrieb Pascal Bleser:
2017-02-12 13:39 GMT+01:00 Olaf Hering :
[...]
Do you hard it still on the radar?
I just submitted a build where handbrake builds libbluray on its own, as static.
I'll send a cr to revert the patch on the package on
2017-02-12 13:39 GMT+01:00 Olaf Hering :
[...]
> Do you hard it still on the radar?
I just submitted a build where handbrake builds libbluray on its own, as static.
I'll send a cr to revert the patch on the package on multimedia:libs
(and packman, it's _link'ed there) to avoid
Am 7. Februar 2017 13:21:16 MEZ schrieb Olaf Hering :
>On Tue, Feb 07, Pascal Bleser wrote:
>
>> Then the better solution would be to make a static build of libbluray
>> into Handbrake, but not sure that is going to work without some heavy
>> patching
>
>Well, until then the latest
On Tue, Feb 07, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> Then the better solution would be to make a static build of libbluray
> into Handbrake, but not sure that is going to work without some heavy
> patching
Well, until then the latest and greatest is only available in
Tumbleweed. There is nothing wrong with
2017-02-07 11:00 GMT+01:00 Olaf Hering :
> On Thu, Feb 02, Pascal Bleser wrote:
[...]
> Is libbluray ABI compatible with the version that was released with Leap?
> Both share the same SONAME, but given the history of libbluray failures
> its very likely that binaries not built
2017-02-07 11:00 GMT+01:00 Olaf Hering :
> On Thu, Feb 02, Pascal Bleser wrote:
>
>> Having a look at it, but I'm currently stuck because they require a
>> patched libbluray so I have to submit the changes there first.
>
> Is libbluray ABI compatible with the version that was
On Thu, Feb 02, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> Having a look at it, but I'm currently stuck because they require a
> patched libbluray so I have to submit the changes there first.
Is libbluray ABI compatible with the version that was released with Leap?
Both share the same SONAME, but given the history
2017-02-01 18:56 GMT+01:00 Jason DeRose :
> Hello, I was curious if packman would be updated to the latest version
> of Handbrake soon? The current version in packman is 0.10.5 which is
> from February 2016. The current release is 1.0.2. The handbrake-unstable
> package is about 3
Hello, I was curious if packman would be updated to the latest version
of Handbrake soon? The current version in packman is 0.10.5 which is
from February 2016. The current release is 1.0.2. The handbrake-unstable
package is about 3 years old so seemingly abandoned.
Thanks very much!
11 matches
Mail list logo