Hi Cristian,
Am 10.05.2012 22:17, schrieb Cristian Morales Vega:
IMHO: go ahead and add them. But don't publish them, just keep Use for
Build checked. So people cannot fsck up their SLES with these rpm
packages (and to use the built packages, they should not need the
patched RPM).
Done
Am 08.05.2012 15:39, schrieb Cristian Morales Vega:
So... any +1/-1 about adding these rpm packages to Essentials?
Again, the idea is to allow multimedia:libs/multimedia:apps
maintainers play with the new rpm features. We can link them and will
still build in the old distros that we support
On 8 May 2012 15:43, Stefan Seyfried se...@s3e.de wrote:
Am 08.05.2012 15:39, schrieb Cristian Morales Vega:
So... any +1/-1 about adding these rpm packages to Essentials?
Again, the idea is to allow multimedia:libs/multimedia:apps
maintainers play with the new rpm features. We can link them
Am 06.05.2012 16:52, schrieb Cristian Morales Vega:
mjpegtools with pkgconfig() BuildRequires, %make_install and no
BuildRoot tag is building in home:RedDwarf for Evergreen 11.1 and
11.2. If someone can say me where to get the SRPMs for SLE the same
thing could be done for them.
What SRPM
On Mon, 07 May 2012 17:03:12 +0200
Stefan Seyfried
stefan.seyfr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 06.05.2012 16:52, schrieb Cristian Morales Vega:
mjpegtools with pkgconfig() BuildRequires, %make_install and no
BuildRoot tag is building in home:RedDwarf for Evergreen 11.1 and
11.2. If someone
On 4 May 2012 18:52, Cristian Morales Vega reddw...@opensuse.org wrote:
On 4 May 2012 16:48, Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote:
discussing it on the list first: there are many issues with
the way the maintainers of multimedia:libs and multimedia:apps
on build.o.o handle their
Am Freitag, 4. Mai 2012, 18:36:26 schrieb Cristian Morales Vega:
transcode is dead, let's accept it. And I see 11 packages that require
it. Either the dependencies are wrong or those packages should have
already started to move to something else. Those packages are usually
DVD related... we
On 2012-05-04 23:49:27 (+0200), Manfred Tremmel manf...@links2linux.de wrote:
Am Freitag, 4. Mai 2012, 18:36:26 schrieb Cristian Morales Vega:
transcode is dead, let's accept it. And I see 11 packages that require
it. Either the dependencies are wrong or those packages should have
already
On 4 May 2012 22:49, Manfred Tremmel manf...@links2linux.de wrote:
Am Freitag, 4. Mai 2012, 18:36:26 schrieb Cristian Morales Vega:
transcode is dead, let's accept it. And I see 11 packages that require
it. Either the dependencies are wrong or those packages should have
already started to
Am Samstag, 5. Mai 2012, 11:40:39 schrieb Pascal Bleser:
On 2012-05-04 23:49:27 (+0200), Manfred Tremmel In the past we
lost a lot of maintainer entries in the packages, I
don't know when and why this happend. I'm also a littel bit
confused, because osc commands have changed a while ago.
Hi Pascal,
Am 04.05.2012 17:48, schrieb Pascal Bleser:
On 2012-05-04 15:58:33 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega reddw...@opensuse.org
wrote:
On 4 May 2012 15:39, Stefan Seyfried stefan.seyfr...@googlemail.com wrote:
a small question wrt. the workflow in pmbs -- in order to not step on
On 04.05.2012 16:58, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
On 4 May 2012 15:39, Stefan Seyfriedstefan.seyfr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all,
a small question wrt. the workflow in pmbs -- in order to not step on
anyone's toes :-)
In order to update clipgrab to the latest version, I have linked it into
On 2012-05-05 22:21:39 (+0200), Stefan Seyfried
stefan.seyfr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 04.05.2012 17:48, schrieb Pascal Bleser:
On 2012-05-04 15:58:33 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega
reddw...@opensuse.org wrote:
On 4 May 2012 15:39, Stefan Seyfried stefan.seyfr...@googlemail.com
Hi all,
a small question wrt. the workflow in pmbs -- in order to not step on
anyone's toes :-)
In order to update clipgrab to the latest version, I have linked it into
home:seife and updated it there. It builds fine.
The question is: what to do now? Submitrequest and self-accept?
Submitrequest
On 4 May 2012 15:39, Stefan Seyfried stefan.seyfr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all,
a small question wrt. the workflow in pmbs -- in order to not step on
anyone's toes :-)
In order to update clipgrab to the latest version, I have linked it into
home:seife and updated it there. It builds
On 04.05.2012 16:58, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
On 4 May 2012 15:39, Stefan Seyfriedstefan.seyfr...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
a small question wrt. the workflow in pmbs -- in order to not step on
anyone's toes
In order to update clipgrab to the latest version, I have linked it
On 4 May 2012 16:48, Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote:
On 2012-05-04 15:58:33 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega reddw...@opensuse.org
wrote:
That's why a lot of packages don't really have much of a
maintainer and why, instead, I'm jumping from one package to
another like a fire
On 4 May 2012 16:48, Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org wrote:
discussing it on the list first: there are many issues with
the way the maintainers of multimedia:libs and multimedia:apps
on build.o.o handle their packages, I've mentioned that in the
past (they don't care about older
18 matches
Mail list logo
