Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@... writes:
Solved, as discussed on the other thread.
No, afaict faac is still listed as GPL v2 or later and the description
says
FAAC is licensed under the GPL.
Correct, I didn't check there.
Fixed too (building as we speak)
Thank you!
Carl Eugen
On 2010-11-16 23:01:50 (+), Carl Eugen Hoyos ceho...@ag.or.at wrote:
Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@... writes:
On 2010-11-15 13:34:25 (+0100), Carl Eugen Hoyos c...@... wrote:
[...]
Thank you, next problem is (lib)faac, it is also listed as GPL,
but it is actually non-free:
On 2010-11-15 13:34:25 (+0100), Carl Eugen Hoyos c...@hoyos.ws wrote:
[...]
Thank you, next problem is (lib)faac, it is also listed as GPL,
but it is actually non-free:
http://www.audiocoding.com/faac.html
(Making it impossible to distribute FFmpeg linked to faac.)
Solved, as discussed on the
Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@... writes:
On 2010-11-15 13:34:25 (+0100), Carl Eugen Hoyos c...@... wrote:
[...]
Thank you, next problem is (lib)faac, it is also listed as GPL,
but it is actually non-free:
http://www.audiocoding.com/faac.html
(Making it impossible to distribute FFmpeg
On 2010-09-13 11:51:06 (+), Carl Eugen Hoyos ceho...@ag.or.at wrote:
Hi!
Hi Carl Eugen
Package information lists GPL as license for Shorten (audio codec).
Looking at the source package, the COPYING file seems to contain a proprietary
software license...
Thanks a lot for pointing that
Hi!
Package information lists GPL as license for Shorten (audio codec).
Looking at the source package, the COPYING file seems to contain a proprietary
software license...
Carl Eugen
___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
