Re: [packman] dependencies of packman subpackages from same build

2017-02-20 Diskussionsfäden Daniel Pecka
Sorry, but I'm sad to read your answer ... You advocate abhorrent crutch repeating over and over that the ball in front of us is cube .. anyhow, thanks for all your activities for packman anyway, perhaps things change one day. Maybe I should write some SDB article describing in-depth what other

Re: [packman] dependencies of packman subpackages from same build

2017-02-17 Diskussionsfäden sigsegv111 .
Thanks for your input ... > What we used to do in the past is to add a "pm" suffix in the release tag, e.g. ffmpeg-1.2.3-23.pm this sounds good to me. >> SUSEhelp on freenode knows this factoid: >> ``zypper dup --from packman'' is wrong. It will forcefully >> update _all_ packages that you

Re: [packman] dependencies of packman subpackages from same build

2017-02-17 Diskussionsfäden Olaf Hering
Am Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:28:42 +0100 schrieb "sigsegv111 ." : > >> SUSEhelp on freenode knows this factoid: > >> ``zypper dup --from packman'' is wrong. It will > >> forcefully update _all_ packages that you have already in your > >> system with theirs packman instances

Re: [packman] dependencies of packman subpackages from same build

2017-02-14 Diskussionsfäden Olaf Hering
On Tue, Feb 07, Pascal Bleser wrote: > Until zypper implements that behavior (which sounds like a very good > idea to me), which won't be available until the next Leap to most > users anyhow, the best approach is probably to do hard requires with > version+release. After reaching out to

Re: [packman] dependencies of packman subpackages from same build

2017-02-07 Diskussionsfäden Pascal Bleser
It is indeed annoying because you end up with a setup that doesn't play closed formats properly as it should be, with ffmpeg/libav packages from different repositories. It also affects mplayer. Until zypper implements that behavior (which sounds like a very good idea to me), which won't be

Re: [packman] dependencies of packman subpackages from same build

2017-02-07 Diskussionsfäden Olaf Hering
On Tue, Feb 07, Daniel Pecka wrote: > We were discussing this with olaf few weeks ago and I've suggested to > ensure that proper libs from proper vendor are satisfied if you explicitely > set your deps to be `= %version-%release' (eg they will require lib > packages that have same version-release

[packman] dependencies of packman subpackages from same build

2017-02-07 Diskussionsfäden Daniel Pecka
Hello, I've been solving in #suse in past weeks with several ppl same problem: They had installed some package(s) from packman but its deps (usually subpackages from same build) were from repo-oss .. Good example is ffmpeg, which shall looks after the successful installation: # rpm -qa