Re: [packman] Handbrake - Latest version?

On Thu, Feb 02, Pascal Bleser wrote: > Having a look at it, but I'm currently stuck because they require a > patched libbluray so I have to submit the changes there first. Is libbluray ABI compatible with the version that was released with Leap? Both share the same SONAME, but given the history

[packman] The great deletion

@Olaf weren't 13.x repos supposed to be removed by now? Or perhaps the plan has been scuttled? Regards ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] Handbrake - Latest version?

On Tue, Feb 07, Pascal Bleser wrote: > Then the better solution would be to make a static build of libbluray > into Handbrake, but not sure that is going to work without some heavy > patching Well, until then the latest and greatest is only available in Tumbleweed. There is nothing wrong with

Re: [packman] The great deletion

On Tue, Feb 07, Luigi Baldoni wrote: > weren't 13.x repos supposed to be removed by now? 13.x was removed, its still available on the mirrors. Its time to add a 42.3 target at some point. Olaf signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Packman

Re: [packman] Handbrake - Latest version?

2017-02-07 11:00 GMT+01:00 Olaf Hering : > On Thu, Feb 02, Pascal Bleser wrote: > >> Having a look at it, but I'm currently stuck because they require a >> patched libbluray so I have to submit the changes there first. > > Is libbluray ABI compatible with the version that was

Re: [packman] Handbrake - Latest version?

2017-02-07 11:00 GMT+01:00 Olaf Hering : > On Thu, Feb 02, Pascal Bleser wrote: [...] > Is libbluray ABI compatible with the version that was released with Leap? > Both share the same SONAME, but given the history of libbluray failures > its very likely that binaries not built

[packman] dependencies of packman subpackages from same build

Hello, I've been solving in #suse in past weeks with several ppl same problem: They had installed some package(s) from packman but its deps (usually subpackages from same build) were from repo-oss .. Good example is ffmpeg, which shall looks after the successful installation: # rpm -qa

Re: [packman] dependencies of packman subpackages from same build

On Tue, Feb 07, Daniel Pecka wrote: > We were discussing this with olaf few weeks ago and I've suggested to > ensure that proper libs from proper vendor are satisfied if you explicitely > set your deps to be `= %version-%release' (eg they will require lib > packages that have same version-release

Re: [packman] dependencies of packman subpackages from same build

It is indeed annoying because you end up with a setup that doesn't play closed formats properly as it should be, with ffmpeg/libav packages from different repositories. It also affects mplayer. Until zypper implements that behavior (which sounds like a very good idea to me), which won't be

Re: [packman] 32 bit baselibs needed by winegstreamer still not published

On Mon, Jan 30, Olaf Hering wrote: > It seems the bug was that publishing is disabled for Leap/i586, which > appearently also covers all the -32bit packages in Leap/x86_64. Now > publishing is enabled for Leap/i586, hopefully that was the missing > knob. It may take some time until the packages

Re: [packman] [PM] pcsx2 1.4.0+git20161227.1208-1.1 (openSUSE_Leap 42.2/x86_64)

On Tue, Jan 10, Guo Yunhe wrote: > Maybe the Git version is not stable enough for daily use yet. Could you > package stable release as pcsx2 and unstable release pcsx2-beta? There is now a pcsx2-32bit.rpm for Leap, please check if it works. Olaf signature.asc Description: PGP signature