On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Sebastian Nowicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fortunately
pacman seems to be working perfectly now, it's just the dev toolset
(makepkg, repo-add, etc) that needs porting.
Ok cool, hopefully we are not too far :)
The last point was that chown problem so I
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately it is outdated now.
I am attaching the two uptodate branches as tar.gz of patches.
This will be useful for me if I get a connection again to update the
repo, or for others if my connection is not fixed :)
Crap I
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No problem, so here is the current list :
--source= -S
--noconfirm= -n
--noprogressbar = -N
--holdver= -H
--forcever = ?
--asroot = ?
So what do people think about a
On 2008-05-28, Xavier wrote:
--source= -S
--noconfirm= -n
--noprogressbar = -N
--holdver= -H
--forcever = ?
--asroot = ?
Someone else suggested -0 and -F. The only extra I would
suggest is an additional check for --help so for
On 28/05/2008, at 8:18 PM, Xavier wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No problem, so here is the current list :
--source= -S
--noconfirm= -n
--noprogressbar = -N
--holdver= -H
--forcever = ?
--asroot
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Mark Constable [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-05-28, Xavier wrote:
--source= -S
--noconfirm= -n
--noprogressbar = -N
--holdver= -H
--forcever = ?
--asroot = ?
Someone else suggested -0 and -F.
Mark Constable wrote:
On 2008-05-28, Xavier wrote:
--source= -S
--noconfirm= -n
--noprogressbar = -N
--holdver= -H
--forcever = ?
--asroot = ?
Someone else suggested -0 and -F. The only extra I would
suggest is an
On 2008-05-28, Allan McRae wrote:
Also, I would find it a bit weird passing only
short options for --noprogressbar and --noconfirm which do not have
short options in pacman which is their eventual target.
. an experienced user will get used to any new options
. a new user will always have
