+03:00 от Jelle van der Waa
><je...@vdwaa.nl>:
>
>On 09/12/16 at 09:47am, Sergey Petrenko via pacman-dev wrote:
>> Should I spam kernel package maintainers then, or maybe someone will resolve
>> bug as wontfix?
>
>Not sure why they need to be spammed, you ca
Should I spam kernel package maintainers then, or maybe someone will resolve
bug as wontfix?
>Суббота, 10 сентября 2016, 0:58 +03:00 от Allan McRae <al...@archlinux.org>:
>
>On 10/09/16 08:41, Sergey Petrenko via pacman-dev wrote:
>> Here is my attempt to solve seven years
I had gave a big thought to the question, who should decide whether to try to
archive package.
At first glance it looks like maintainer's responsibility. She/he/it creates a
package without file conflicts intending possibility for multiple versions to
be installed on a system. Yet this means
Unfortunately, some changes are required to testing framework to handle
multiple versions of package.
New tests should make expected behavior of `archived` packages pretty clear.
---
test/pacman/pmdb.py | 51 +++-
test/pacman/pmpkg.py
Here is my attempt to solve seven years old infamous problem:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16702
Patch won't solve problem out of the box, a small changes in kernel PKGBUILD
will be required, but only concerning install part.
Idea behind patch is pretty simple:
1) Configure list of packages
/backup-kernel#L11
manually parse package version.
>Понедельник, 5 сентября 2016, 10:45 +03:00 от Allan McRae
><al...@archlinux.org>:
>
>On 05/09/16 03:44, Sergey Petrenko via pacman-dev wrote:
>> I'm writing hooks to solve infamous kernel problem. Having version in
gmail.com >:
>
>On 09/04/16 at 08:56pm, Sergey Petrenko via pacman-dev wrote:
>> Variables are now at beginning of block.
>>
>> ---
>
>I would love to provide more information to hooks about the
>transaction, but, without a compelling justification, I'm -1 on this
Variables are now at beginning of block.
---
lib/libalpm/hook.c| 104 +-
test/pacman/tests/TESTS | 1 +
test/pacman/tests/hook-target-versions.py | 47 ++
3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
M +, Sergey Petrenko via pacman-dev wrote:
>> ---
>
>Missing seems to be some rationale for this patch. What's the problem
>you're interested in solving with this feature?
>
>> lib/libalpm/hook.c| 102
>> --
>&g
---
lib/libalpm/hook.c| 102 --
test/pacman/tests/TESTS | 1 +
test/pacman/tests/hook-target-versions.py | 47 ++
3 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
10 matches
Mail list logo
