On Tuesday 23 December 2014 11:18:51 Allan McRae wrote:
It would probably be a good idea to set umask 022 for
/var/cache/pacman/archives/ as well, but that is not as severe as this
issue.
If there are people who actually use 'umask 027' to make their packages
unreadable, what about a
On 20/12/14 20:58, Peter Wu wrote:
This prevents the database from becoming inaccessible for non-root
users when the script was executed with a umask of 027.
Signed-off-by: Peter Wu pe...@lekensteyn.nl
---
Applied.
Hi,
It would probably be a good idea to set umask 022 for
This prevents the database from becoming inaccessible for non-root
users when the script was executed with a umask of 027.
Signed-off-by: Peter Wu pe...@lekensteyn.nl
---
Hi,
It would probably be a good idea to set umask 022 for
/var/cache/pacman/archives/ as well, but that is not as severe as
On 20/12/14 20:58, Peter Wu wrote:
It would probably be a good idea to set umask 022 for
/var/cache/pacman/archives/ as well
What is that directory?
On Saturday 20 December 2014 21:00:57 Allan McRae wrote:
On 20/12/14 20:58, Peter Wu wrote:
It would probably be a good idea to set umask 022 for
/var/cache/pacman/archives/ as well
What is that directory?
Typo:
s/archives/pkg/
--
Kind regards,
Peter
https://lekensteyn.nl
