On 07.10.2016 03:52, Alad Wenter wrote:
> The idea would be that each warning, if applicable, is addressed in a 
> separate patch.

Good idea. If a warning appears multiple times and requires different
ways of dealing with it in certain situations, please split that into
multiple patches. It greatly simplifies reviewing if all the changes in
one patch do exactly the same.

I've quickly reviewed the proposed changes and they look good in
general. Patches will be reviewed anyways so I'd say just go ahead.

Florian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to