Re: [pacman-dev] Versioned packages

2016-09-20 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 09/19/2016 11:49 AM, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: > What about adding a new option to pacman's '-D, --database' operator > which would enable users to rename packages and add a corresponding > provide field. This would empower everyone to decide on their own which > packages they want in different

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH v8 01/12] bacman: allow for multiple packages as arguments

2016-09-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 09/09/16 16:21, Allan McRae wrote: > Correct - most changes will be pulled from this patchset. Just not the > parallelization patches. I will pull the other patches to my patchqueue > branch soon. You can now see what I intend to commit on my "bacman" branch:

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH v8 11/12] bacman: add manual page

2016-09-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 05/09/16 02:14, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: > Signed-off-by: Gordian Edenhofer I made some minor wording changes and adjusted the examples section formatting. A

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH v8 10/12] bacman: add option to specify the number of jobs

2016-09-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 05/09/16 02:14, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: > Signed-off-by: Gordian Edenhofer As discussed, this will not be included. A

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH v8 04/12] bacman: proper option handling

2016-09-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 20/09/16 23:32, Allan McRae wrote: > On 05/09/16 02:13, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: >> Switch to parseopts instead of merely checking the first argument. >> >> Signed-off-by: Gordian Edenhofer > > OK. I made minor modifications due to not include patch #3. >

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH v8 07/12] bacman: quote pkg_pkger variable

2016-09-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 05/09/16 02:14, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: > Signed-off-by: Gordian Edenhofer > --- OK.

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH v8 08/12] bacman: add option to print fewer status updates

2016-09-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 05/09/16 02:14, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: > Signed-off-by: Gordian Edenhofer > --- > contrib/bacman.sh.in | 8 ++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > OK.

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH v8 06/12] bacman: code structuring

2016-09-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 05/09/16 02:14, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: > Adding and clarifying comments. > Adding and removing some new lines. > > Signed-off-by: Gordian Edenhofer OK.

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH v8 05/12] bacman: rewrite usage function

2016-09-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 05/09/16 02:14, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: > Signed-off-by: Gordian Edenhofer > --- > contrib/bacman.sh.in | 16 > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/contrib/bacman.sh.in b/contrib/bacman.sh.in > index

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH v8 04/12] bacman: proper option handling

2016-09-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 05/09/16 02:13, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: > Switch to parseopts instead of merely checking the first argument. > > Signed-off-by: Gordian Edenhofer OK. I made minor modifications due to not include patch #3. A

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH v8 02/12] bacman: handle SIGHUP, SIGINT, SIGTERM signals

2016-09-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 05/09/16 02:13, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: > Trap SIGHUP, SIGINT, SIGTERM and remove working directories accordingly. > > Signed-off-by: Gordian Edenhofer OK

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH v8 01/12] bacman: allow for multiple packages as arguments

2016-09-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 05/09/16 02:13, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: > To enable the creation of multiple packages with one command move the > assembly process into its own function. > > Signed-off-by: Gordian Edenhofer OK

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH v8 03/12] bacman: parallel packaging

2016-09-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 05/09/16 02:13, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: > Signed-off-by: Gordian Edenhofer As discussed, this will not be pulled.

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Fix gcc strict-overflow error

2016-09-20 Thread Andrew Gregory
On 09/20/16 at 10:50pm, Allan McRae wrote: > On 18/09/16 01:13, Rikard Falkeborn wrote: > > Recent gcc (tested with 6.2.1) produces the following error when > > compiling with both --enable-warningflags and --enable-debug. > > In particular, it seems it is the combination of GCC_STACK_PROTECT_LIB

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] Fix gcc strict-overflow error

2016-09-20 Thread Allan McRae
On 18/09/16 01:13, Rikard Falkeborn wrote: > Recent gcc (tested with 6.2.1) produces the following error when > compiling with both --enable-warningflags and --enable-debug. > In particular, it seems it is the combination of GCC_STACK_PROTECT_LIB > and -Wstrict-overflow=5 produces the error. > >