Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] bacman: allow for parallel packaging

2016-08-31 Thread Allan McRae
On 01/09/16 09:44, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: > On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 08:28 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: >> On 01/09/16 08:08, Dave Reisner wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:18:32PM +0200, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: > >> >>> >>> The second probably would not be accepted...

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] bacman: allow for parallel packaging

2016-08-31 Thread Gordian Edenhofer
On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 08:28 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > On 01/09/16 08:08, Dave Reisner wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:18:32PM +0200, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The second probably would not be accepted... > > > > > > > > > > I urge

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] bacman: allow for parallel packaging

2016-08-31 Thread Allan McRae
On 01/09/16 08:08, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:18:32PM +0200, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: > The second probably would not be accepted... I urge you to reconsider. Parallelization increases the speed of this >>> >>> I don't think anyone is suggesting that

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] bacman: allow for parallel packaging

2016-08-31 Thread Dave Reisner
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:18:32PM +0200, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: > > > > The second probably would not be accepted... > > > > > > I urge you to reconsider. Parallelization increases the speed of > > > this > > > > I don't think anyone is suggesting that packaging multiple things in > >

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] bacman: allow for parallel packaging

2016-08-31 Thread Gordian Edenhofer
> > > The second probably would not be accepted... > > > > I urge you to reconsider. Parallelization increases the speed of > > this > > I don't think anyone is suggesting that packaging multiple things in > parallel isn't useful. I already suggested that nothing needs to be > implemented in

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] bacman: allow for parallel packaging

2016-08-31 Thread Gordian Edenhofer
On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 20:30 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > On 15/08/16 06:39, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: > > > > * move the actual assembly process into its own function > > * allow for packaging multiple packages with one command > > * handle SIGHUP SIGINT SIGTERM and remove working dirs accordingly

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] bacman: allow for parallel packaging

2016-08-31 Thread Dave Reisner
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:35:37PM +0200, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: > On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 20:30 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > > On 15/08/16 06:39, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: > > > > > > * move the actual assembly process into its own function > > > * allow for packaging multiple packages with one

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] bacman: allow for parallel packaging

2016-08-30 Thread Allan McRae
On 15/08/16 06:39, Gordian Edenhofer wrote: > * move the actual assembly process into its own function > * allow for packaging multiple packages with one command > * handle SIGHUP SIGINT SIGTERM and remove working dirs accordingly > * add some comments > > Signed-off-by: Gordian Edenhofer

[pacman-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] bacman: allow for parallel packaging

2016-08-14 Thread Gordian Edenhofer
* move the actual assembly process into its own function * allow for packaging multiple packages with one command * handle SIGHUP SIGINT SIGTERM and remove working dirs accordingly * add some comments Signed-off-by: Gordian Edenhofer --- * Clean up working