Dan McGee wrote:
The magic:
pkglist=$(mktemp)
pacman -Sl $1 $pkglist
pacman -Q | while read pkg; do
ret=0
grep -q $pkg $pkglist || ret=$?
if [ $ret -eq 0 ]; then
echo $pkg
fi
done
rm $pkglist
Nice! I will submit the patch which adds this script to contrib later
today.
Sebastian Nowicki wrote:
I'm not sure that I like the idea very much. We should keep away from
anything that makes PKGBUILDs more like Gentoo ebuilds. I love the
simplicity and, I suppose, explicitness of PKGBUILDs because they are
very easy to follow for anyone a bit familiar with
Dan McGee wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if((fp = alpm_pkg_changelog_open(pkg)) == NULL) {
- /* TODO after string freeze use pm_fprintf */
- fprintf(stderr, _(error: no changelog available for
'%s'.\n
Dan McGee wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if((fp = alpm_pkg_changelog_open(pkg)) == NULL) {
- /* TODO after string freeze use pm_fprintf */
- fprintf(stderr, _(error: no changelog available for
'%s'.\n
Xavier wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unknown and depreciated options are upgraded to error conditions.
+known_options=('strip' 'docs' 'libtool' 'emptydirs' 'ccache' 'distcc'
'makeflags' 'force')
+valid_options=0
+for opt in [EMAIL
Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But ok, that explains it. It might be that this error.h just stayed
there on my other box.
No, Linux or gcc 4.3 apparently doesn't blow up on a missing header
file. I don't have it here and
Can we add a check on the libarchive version number when configuring
pacman. You can run configure without a problem with a libarchive 1.x
version but not actually complete the build. See
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=367593
I know next to nothing about libarchive so I am giving
Roman Kyrylych wrote:
2008/5/19 Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Xavier wrote:
But I think the current behavior is fine, just print an error in any cases.
Are there really situations where you only want to generate md5sums,
but not build the package or simply fix the pkgbuild so
Mark Constable wrote:
On 2008-05-28, Xavier wrote:
--source= -S
--noconfirm= -n
--noprogressbar = -N
--holdver= -H
--forcever = ?
--asroot = ?
Someone else suggested -0 and -F. The only extra I would
suggest is an
Here is an inline version. Slightly changed from the version carlocci
posted to fix a minor bug.
Allan
#!/bin/bash
#
# bacman: recreate a package from a running system
# This script rebuilds an already installed package using metadata
# stored into the pacman database and system files
#
Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 04:32:15PM -0500, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes there is use for this- to help people using makepkg comply with
the GPL and providing source and the necessary tools to build it when
they provide binary packages. I didn't remove the
Dan McGee wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Anton Fiuman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
makepkg should not abort with error when a user uses the --nobuild option to
extract sources if a package has already been built.
Signed-off-by: Anton Fiuman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seems logical to
Antonio Huete Jimenez wrote:
And there comes the idea I was talking about. I think that scripts
should behave according to the operating from where they are running
on. I'm doing some changes to scripts for doing so, but it will take
me few days to have something useable.
I also think
Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 06:47:36AM -0500, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what are you saying, did anyone actually look at the patch? I
didn't change the existing --source option one bit, that *still* only
includes local source files.
yes, i read that
Dan McGee wrote:
snip
+ local netfile
+ for netfile in [EMAIL PROTECTED]; do
+ local file=$(strip_url $netfile)
+ if [ -f $netfile ]; then
+ msg2 $(gettext Adding %s...) $netfile
+ comp_files=$comp_files $netfile
+
Alessio Bolognino wrote:
On Mon 2008-06-02 11:54, Xavier wrote:
From f5c5a277e2df14650ae441f32950aa6d4deee50f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xavier Chantry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 21:57:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] makepkg : switch from getopt to getopts builtin
getopt is
Antonio Huete Jimenez wrote:
I was thinking a way of changing --prefix= used in configure. I think
it's desirable to have a chance to change this to another directory,
specially in BSD where a lot of userland applications should not be
replaced with packages.
pkgsrc does that by
Original work by Carlo carlocci Bersani with additions by
Xavier Chantry and Allan McRae
This script rebuilds an already installed package using metadata
stored into the pacman database and system files. Replaces the
outdated re-pacman script
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED
This supplements the --source option and does nearly the same thing, except
downloaded source files are included in the archive as well. The sources are
now packages with a pkgname/ prefix.
Original work by: Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
scripts
Xavier wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch fixes the warning messages when syncing a package where
the local version is newer that the db version. Also, all messages
are suppressed when using --print-uris and messages about upgrading
Xavier wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um, no I missed that completely.
I think your version is the much cleaner way to do this. However, it
still prints the warning messages (forcing upgrade is newer than)
in _alpm_pkg_compare_versions
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
+ backup_o=$backup
+ conflicts_o=$conflicts
+ depends_o=$depends
+ groups_o=$groups
+ install_o=$install
+ license_o=$license
+ pkgdesc_o=$pkgdesc
+
Hi all,
I discovered gcov so was testing out the coverage of the pactests.
During searching for more info about gcov I saw Dan already had written
something on it
(http://toofishes.net/blog/using-gcov-code-coverage-testing/) so not as
novel as I thought...
Anyway, as an FYI, here is a list
Removes the remaining $startdir/{src,pkg} usage and adds quoting
around (hopefully) all remaining path variables
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
scripts/makepkg.sh.in | 17 -
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in b
Carlo Bersani wrote:
Sorry, I had to study how git works with coming exams
Hope this is fine:
Here is the cheat-sheet I made when first starting pacman development.
It should be all you need to know for everyday git usage with the pacman
repo.
# Clone git repo - only needed once
git
Dan McGee wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carlo Bersani wrote:
Sorry, I had to study how git works with coming exams
Hope this is fine:
Good work Allan. I've quickly thrown it into a wiki article along with
some helpful links
Hi Pete,
Can you post the script inline so it would be easier for us to comment on.
Thanks,
Allan
___
pacman-dev mailing list
pacman-dev@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
Eric Belanger wrote:
Although the '!libtool' option is used, there is a libtool file in the
package: lib/libhandle.la
I'm guessing that makepkg doesn't search /lib for libtool files so it
needs to be manually removed. Of course, I assume that it's not needed.
That is actually a dangling
Allan McRae wrote:
Eric Belanger wrote:
Although the '!libtool' option is used, there is a libtool file in the
package: lib/libhandle.la
I'm guessing that makepkg doesn't search /lib for libtool files so it
needs to be manually removed. Of course, I assume that it's not needed
Dan McGee wrote:
I do see the use in this because I build regularly where I need to
use the -d option, which unfortunately prevents a single dependency
from being checked. Two years is a long time, so there has been plenty
of time to reconsider, and I find the reasons in the bug report just
Nagy Gabor wrote:
-bsdtar -czf $pkg_dest/$pkg_namver-$pkg_arch.tar.gz $(ls -A) || ret=$?
+bsdtar -czf $pkg_dest/$pkg_namver-$pkg_arch$pkg_ext $(ls -A) || ret=$?
Wow. I tested this script many, many times and I can't believe I missed
that!
Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Bächler wrote:
If destarch is added to a PKGBUILD,
I read that as de-starch and was confused for a while... :)
makepkg sets the architecture of the
resulting package
Dan McGee wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I figured I could still send patches for ABS here for people to look at
since this is the address listed in --help output...
Anyway, I mainly wanted a comment on this line:
INCLUDE=$(echo
Dan McGee wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan McGee wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I figured I could still send patches for ABS here for people to look at
since
Dan McGee wrote:
This presents plenty of problems on OSes besides Linux, and even on Linux
when the libtool file for libarchive isn't present. The static build isn't
all that useful anyway as missing something such as glibc will still leave
you unable to run the pacman.static binary. Remove it
Dan McGee wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Allan McRae wrote:
Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using the suggestion from FS#10905, use 'svn info' rather than 'svn log
Nagy Gabor wrote:
2. Xav said, that deltas are broken. Couldn't we move this out from
alpm code, and using it XferCommand or whatever (or implement new
external helper, if needed)?
How broken are they? More specifically, does this code need some minor
fixes or a complete overhaul?
BTW,
Dan McGee wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:14 AM, Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More google searching on this and requiring to correct my previous
assertions... LC_ALL=C is equivalent to LC_ALL=POSIX. Just
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 1:41 AM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
answer=$(echo $answer | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]')
Random unrelated point - can this line possibly cause issues similar
to the Turkish I/i thing?
Maybe, what
in remove_deps is due to an obscure bug where local
varaibles from the handle_deps function seem stay in scope because we
never formally exited it.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
scripts/makepkg.sh.in |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts
Allan McRae wrote:
This fixed FS#9403. With this you can use makepkg -sr, install the
dependencies, Ctrl+c during the makedepends installation and have
makepkg remove the installed packages on the exit. Previously makepkg
tried to also remove the makedepends which were not installed
Carlo Bersani wrote:
Pactree is a dependency tree viewer for installed packages.
It features both textual and graphic (through graphviz) output.
Thanks for this Carlo.
Dan - I have been following the progress of this script and I am happy
that it is working well. It would be great if
Dan McGee wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Carlo Bersani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I fixed the ugly comments layout as well as the awk long long line
Still need a license header or permission from you to add one of my choosing.
It is there under the colour configuration
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
NEWS | 76 ++
1 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 5a9157a..6429695 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -1,5 +1,81 @@
VERSION
Adds defined options to the PKGINFO file in the form of makepkgopt =.
It may be useful to be able to add these to the pacman DB at some point
as that would allow (e.g.) checking which packages have had their docs
striped (FS#7092).
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
scripts
Allan McRae wrote:
Adds defined options to the PKGINFO file in the form of makepkgopt =.
It may be useful to be able to add these to the pacman DB at some point
as that would allow (e.g.) checking which packages have had their docs
striped (FS#7092).
This is more of a might be a good idea
Xavier wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Allan McRae wrote:
Adds defined options to the PKGINFO file in the form of makepkgopt =.
It may be useful to be able to add these to the pacman DB at some point
as that would allow (e.g.) checking
Dan McGee wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should just put some jury-rigged, hopefully passes both 003
and 004 code in here and really attempt to fix this on the
Xavier wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 3:08 AM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good point about the build options being useless. But I think all other
options should go in so if/when we add further options we would know
they are not used in the package.
If we always put all
Xavier wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may want to add a line about checking out other peoples branches
(e.g. the pgp branch). I would be interested in that too...
Please have a look at these two wiki pages :
http
Xavier wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had figured that out a while ago. That is why it is in the first link
you gave! :D
What, where?
I didn't see anything, so I added this :
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about handling it just like a normal variable ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ array=({foo,bar,baz})
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ [ -z $array ] || echo array not empty
array not empty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ unset
Dan McGee wrote:
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
A release is never perfect. Just a documentation issue here though. Allan, you
wrote the final patch so feel free to chime in on the descriptions I made.
Wow, that was a fast release to bug turn around...
Roman Kyrylych wrote:
2008/7/31 Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Eric Belanger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Dan McGee wrote:
Pacman 3.2.0 is in testing for i686. Please signoff. Changes outlined
here:
Roman Kyrylych wrote:
2008/7/31 Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Eric Belanger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Dan McGee wrote:
Pacman 3.2.0 is in testing for i686. Please signoff. Changes outlined
here:
Dan McGee wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed, that is the first problem, netfile should be quoted here.
local proto=$(echo $netfile | sed 's
Allan McRae wrote:
Dan McGee wrote:
Subject change...and can someone open a bug and get this information
in there, please? I'd rather track it there before 10 other people
complain too.
Filing bug report now.
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11076
This is where I have got up to in searching for the solution:
1) Fix sed statement to extract protocol in get_downloadclient()
local proto=$(echo $url | sed 's|://.*||')
2) escape ampersands in netfile in get_downloadcmd()
local netfile=$(echo $2 | sed s|\|\\\|g)
Then $dlcmd get created
Allan McRae wrote:
We should also automatically compress the info files like we do the
man pages.
Would there be any objects to extending the zipman option to cover the
compressing of info pages too?
Also, I can see two options for doing this. 1) Just add the info
directories
Dan McGee wrote:
Due to differences in handling va_list between i686 and x86_64, this bug
can only be seen on x86_64. va_list usage is not allowed but we had been
getting away with it. See
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-programming/2008-02/msg5.html
for details and explanation.
This
Fixes FS#11149.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
scripts/makepkg.sh.in |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in b/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
index 3604d10..c5dbed9 100644
--- a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
+++ b/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
So, despite me assuring Dan that nothing could possibly go wrong, the
commit to source /etc/profile rather than individual files in
/etc/profile.d
(http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=commitdiff;h=0e0a8461)
has caused a problem. See FS#11179
(http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/11179)
Xavier wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, despite me assuring Dan that nothing could possibly go wrong, the commit
to source /etc/profile rather than individual files in /etc/profile.d
(http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=pacman.git;a=commitdiff;h
As far a package building is concerned, info pages need to be treated
in the same fashion as man pages in that they both can be compressed.
This separates them from other forms of documentation and so it makes
sense to make that distinction within makepkg.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae [EMAIL
Hi all,
Now that pacman 3.2 is out the door and the initial bug fixes appear
done, I am going to work on adding the package splitting feature to makepkg.
So the time has come for some input on the prototype PKGBUILD for
splitting packages again. We discussed this a couple of months ago on
Xavier wrote:
I was recently considering to implement package file hooks.
snip
But today I felt on this :
http://www.linux.com/feature/144666
And this looks great, this feature might not even need to be
implemented in pacman.
But well, I don't know how well it would work in practice. It is just
Allan McRae wrote:
Xavier wrote:
I was recently considering to implement package file hooks.
snip
But today I felt on this :
http://www.linux.com/feature/144666
And this looks great, this feature might not even need to be
implemented in pacman.
But well, I don't know how well it would work
G_Syme wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008 03:42:05 Xavier wrote:
[...]
For FS#11292 (handling multiple source files which have the same
name), a new feature had to be introduced.
it is now possible to use the filename of your choice for remote
sources, like this :
Xavier Chantry wrote:
A source entry can now have the following form, to specify a different
filename :
filename::http://path/to/file;
Of course, the old syntax is still supported :
http://path/to/file;
And as before, in the second case, the filename used is simply file.
This fixes FS#11292,
Roman Kyrylych wrote:
2008/9/17 Andreas Radke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Now that we decided that we want to ship info documentation we
should decide how to package such files: info files could be gzipped by
makepkg or stay uncompressed.
On my system they already take quiet a lot of space compared
Adds defined options to the PKGINFO file in the form of makepkgopt =.
It may be useful to be able to add these to the pacman DB at some point
as that would allow (e.g.) checking which packages have had their docs
striped (FS#7092).
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
scripts
Allan McRae wrote:
Adds defined options to the PKGINFO file in the form of makepkgopt =.
It may be useful to be able to add these to the pacman DB at some point
as that would allow (e.g.) checking which packages have had their docs
striped (FS#7092).
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED
This seems a good idea to me and the patch looks good. One small
comment below.
Tiago Pierezan Camargo wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tiago Pierezan Camargo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
doc/makepkg.conf.5.txt |7 +++
etc/makepkg.conf.in|2 ++
scripts/makepkg.sh.in |9 -
3 files
Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
Hi,
pacman has an option --asdeps so the user can install packages as if
it were deps. In fact, such packages will be treated exactly the same
as normal dependencies:
blah
What are your ideas?
Thanks,
Dieter
That explanation made my head hurt So to put it
-by: Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
abs | 56
conf/abs.conf |7 ++-
2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/abs b/abs
index bd1191d..a369482 100755
--- a/abs
+++ b/abs
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ usage
Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
+if [ ! $(type -p rsync) ]; then
+error missing wget download utility. Install wget.
+exit $_E_MISSING_PROGRAM
+fi
You probably meant 'type -p wget' here?
Good catch! A bit too much copy/paste here...
You can also just check the exit status
Allan McRae wrote:
Fixes a bug and resets pkgrel to 1 when bumping pkgver
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
scripts/makepkg.sh.in |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in b/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
index 5735891..e8add36
Do not attemp to update pkgver/pkgrel when reading a SCM based PKGBUILD
from a pipe. Fixes FS#9187.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
scripts/makepkg.sh.in | 12 +---
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in b/scripts
Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do not attemp to update pkgver/pkgrel when reading a SCM based PKGBUILD
from a pipe. Fixes FS#9187.
So the patch makes sense, but I'm not quite seeing that it is this easy.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp
Dan McGee wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Nagy Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:09 AM, Nagy Gabor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See:
This is the first step in being able to automatically remove phantom
lock files.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
lib/libalpm/util.c | 15 +--
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/libalpm/util.c b/lib/libalpm/util.c
index da3463b
Allan McRae wrote:
This is the first step in being able to automatically remove phantom
lock files.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
I should point out that this is my first attempt at writing to a file at
such a low level (I'm a C++ streams kkinda guy). I'm not sure if I
Dan McGee wrote:
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the first step in being able to automatically remove phantom
lock files.
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
lib/libalpm/util.c | 15 +--
1 files changed, 13 insertions
Jatheendra wrote:
Hi all,
This is a simple patch to add a which like functionality to pacman
-Qo[Bug FS#8798]. This is my first patch ,so any constructive
criticism is most welcome.
Thanks,
Shankar
Nice work. This is a really nice feature to implement.
---
src/pacman/query.c | 62
Henning Garus wrote:
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Nagy Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have been looking through the current delta implementation in
libalpm and have put some thought into changing makepkg/repo-add to
support delta creation. However, I'm running into some problems,
Jakub Schmidtke wrote:
Hi.
I guess this is the right place to ask :)
What is the status of this feature? I have read discussions
from June and August, and some of the ideas look very interesting.
Is there anything going on with this?
Is there a way to help (as non dev/TU though)? :)
Jakub
test condition
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
scripts/makepkg.sh.in | 31 +--
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in b/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
index b0d1dad..f5cdd90 100644
--- a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in
+++ b
Allan McRae wrote:
1. Do not warn people about missing arch if they are using --ignorearch.
2. Remove unneed reference to bug report about using fakeroot as little
as possible. We want to do that, bug report of not.
3. Removes superfluous warning given when building as root. The user
Allan McRae wrote:
Marc - A. Dahlhaus [ Administration | Westermann GmbH ] wrote:
Hello Allen,
the prototype has a little problem in case you give -L option to makepkg
as it is now:
As makepkg pipes the output of the build-function into tee, the
build-function gets executed in a sub-shell
Yun Zheng Hu wrote:
This will make makepkg work properly on systems like Mac OS X, where
the default installed getopt does not handle long options.
see also:
http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2008-May/011830.html
Signed-off-by: Yun Zheng Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Yun Zheng Hu wrote:
This will make makepkg work properly on systems like Mac OS X, where
the default installed getopt does not handle long options.
The new parse_options function tries to behave like the original
getopt command as much as possible.
see also:
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
PKGBUILD.proto |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/PKGBUILD.proto b/PKGBUILD.proto
index 3265530..eddcf75 100644
--- a/PKGBUILD.proto
+++ b/PKGBUILD.proto
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ license=('GPL')
groups=()
depends
The option parsing was catching any -d in an arguement so packages
with this in their name did not work.
Also removed commented code line that appears to be inserted during
testing
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
contrib/pactree |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2
Gerhard Brauer wrote:
Hi Dan,
git clone http://code.toofishes.net/gitprojects/pacman.git
(branch is master)
1. if have to install asciidox (for a2x), that's current not a
(build)depend of pacman
make stops with an error
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/gerhard/al-de/pac-git/pacman/doc'
a2x
Dan McGee wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fix the issue uncovered by FS#12344. In this instance, the dotglob shopt was
being set in the build() function but never cleared, causing issues in the
remaining parts of the makepkg script.
Signed-off-by:
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan McGee wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fix the issue uncovered by FS#12344. In this instance, the dotglob shopt
was
being set in the build
Jud wrote:
Hi,
Dan suggested I send this to the pacman-dev list.
After completing some research and asking alot of questions I present
some minor changes to PKGBUILD.proto supplied as a .diff to be merged
after your approval. I believe it helps the intended audience create a
better PKGBUILD in
Should we be handling this issue?
Allan
Original Message
Subject:[arch-general] PKGBUILD and DOS line endings
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 15:32:26 +0100
From: Alessandro Doro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: General Discusson about Arch Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Jud wrote:
Hi,
Edit: Take2, changed the install line
Dan suggested I send this to the pacman-dev list.
After completing some research and asking alot of questions I present
some minor changes to PKGBUILD.proto supplied as a .diff to be merged
after your approval. I believe it helps the
PKGBUILD.2 - Splitting the packaging step from build step. Limits
fakeroot usage
PKGBUILD.3 - Package splitting
# $Id: PKGBUILD 366 2008-04-19 13:01:23Z travis $
# Maintainer: Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pkgname=abs
pkgver=2.3
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc=Utilities to download and work with the Arch Build
1 - 100 of 4111 matches
Mail list logo
