extern const variables link incorrectly

Using prc-tools (2.3), if I declare some constant data in one compilation unit and try to use it in another, I get garbage. If I move them into the same unit, or make the data non-const, it works. I was able to reproduce this on a single-segment test case, and the type or size of data doesn't seem

Re: extern const variables link incorrectly

Hello, a few months ago, I had the same problem. Ton van Overbeek told me, that this problem is known as bug #221845 (http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=221845group_id=4429atid=104429). You can find his original answer here:

Who owns game's intelligent property?

I would like to develop some game sharewares, but I do not know who owns the intelligent propoertie of games like Solitaires, Tetris, Socoban, Tic Tac Toe and bubble etc. Any info will be helpful. Thanks Matt __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC

pdbc is yielding bad databases

I'm having a lot of trouble using pdbc 0.9.5 under linux, either compiled for linux or through wine. First of all, it throws syntax errors on examples I give it. I got through that but then databases that I created gave the following error when I tried to load them into pose Could not install

Re: pdbc is yielding bad databases

At 04:44 PM 5/16/2004, you wrote: I'm having a lot of trouble using pdbc 0.9.5 under linux, either compiled for linux or through wine. First of all, it throws syntax errors on examples I give it. I got through that but then databases that I created gave the following error when I tried to load

Re: Who owns game's intelligent property?

At 04:52 PM 5/16/2004, you wrote: I would like to develop some game sharewares, but I do not know who owns the intelligent propoertie of games like Solitaires, Tetris, Socoban, Tic Tac Toe and bubble etc. It depends on the game. Some, like Solitaire and Tic-Tac-Toe are so old as to be in the

Re: pdbc is yielding bad databases

I just discovered par after I sent my message and figured out about the size limit. 64000 with par worked like a charm! Thanks. Ben Combee wrote: At 04:44 PM 5/16/2004, you wrote: I'm having a lot of trouble using pdbc 0.9.5 under linux, either compiled for linux or through wine. First of all,

PODS: import existing GCC project?

I cannot believe there is no (easily located) step-by-step guide to convert a standard manual bsh:make project for use in PODS. Has anybody done this? Right now I have a doze *.c and *.h files, one *.prc, a few *.bmp, and a makefile. I have several make targets: pay, compiles the shareware

prc vs. pdb

Is there some whitepaper or article out there detailing the respective advantages and disadvantages of prc and pdb formats? I'm trying to decided which format I want to use for my application and the best documentation I can find is at

CodeWarrior9: Program Name Change?

Hey. My company is in the process of creating a game in CodeWarrior9. One of my programmers named the actual name of the game that appears on the Palm 123. He thought he could change the name later. Well now he and I do not know how to rename the name that appears on the Palm. Is it possible to

Re: prc vs. pdb

Eric Allen wrote: Is there some whitepaper or article out there detailing the respective advantages and disadvantages of prc and pdb formats? I'm trying to decided which format I want to use for my application and the best documentation I can find is at

Re: prc vs. pdb

Think of prcs as part of your application's constant data, pdbs are part of your writeable data. Further, prcs' access methods enhance their use as constant data. pdbs have access methods (while simple) that are useful as writeable datastores. pdbs changes can easily be backed up to the