At 04:27 AM 3/15/2005, you wrote:
Just to close-up the thread.
Mr. Combee took the test program for the purposes of testing the T650 patch,
but forgot to comment the results. Maybe he will do it now...
I've not yet had a chance to test it -- this is SXSW week here in Austin,
and I'm technically on
dicka
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Slodicka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Palm Developer Forum"
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 11:22 PM
Subject: Re: Newer and greater NVFS woes
> I tried it - it does not help. I would wonder if it did as we are just
> reading the
e interested to see if this holds true in your test
case.
Regards,
Aaron Hansen
Extended Systems
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>Michael A. Waldron
>Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 12:47 PM
>To: Palm Developer Forum
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Palm Developer Forum"
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 8:47 PM
Subject: Re: Newer and greater NVFS woes
My tests use ExgDBWrite, and I have the callback set as an empty function.
-Mike
At 01:00 PM 3/11/2005, you wrote:
>In our tests we use DmReleaseRecord(db,
s holds true in your test case.
Regards,
Aaron Hansen
Extended Systems
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>Michael A. Waldron
>Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 12:47 PM
>To: Palm Developer Forum
>Subject: Re: Newer and
AIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: palm-dev-forum
To: "Palm Developer Forum"
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: Newer and greater NVFS woes
> "Dave Carrigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de news:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Fri, M
, 2005 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: Newer and greater NVFS woes
> "Dave Carrigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de news:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 07:34:32AM -0500, Regis St-Gelais wrote:
>
> > Unlikely - creating a database full
e eventually causes corruption.
Agree. (Although in this case it is probably not the corruption.)
Jan
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Carrigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Palm Developer Forum"
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: Newer and greater NVFS
dicka
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Carrigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Palm Developer Forum"
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: Newer and greater NVFS woes
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 07:34:32AM -0500, Regis St-Gelais wrote:
>
> >
I've seen the behavior he's referring to reading random data off of T5/T650
devices, but it occurs much less seldom. I'm looking forward to taking a
look at his code to see if he produces the magical database that _always_
triggers the failure.
-Mike
At 10:48 AM 3/11/2005, you wrote:
"Dave Carr
"Dave Carrigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 07:34:32AM -0500, Regis St-Gelais wrote:
> Unlikely - creating a database full of records is not exactly rocket
> science.
I meant no disrespect, but mistakes and typos do happen.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 10:54:09AM +0100, Jan Slodicka wrote:
> > Try no. 1: on the first pass, it got to record 1718, then gave me a Fatal
> > Alert: "Preferences.c, Line: 264, Pref DB Open Error"
>
> Hard to believe. This normally signifies another Palm OS bug in the prefs
> handling. (They for
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 07:34:32AM -0500, Regis St-Gelais wrote:
> Can we see the code you use to create the database.
> Its possible that there is a problem is there.
Unlikely - creating a database full of records is not exactly rocket
science.
> (I must confess, I did not look deeply into your
"Dave Carrigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I think I have found another bug with the NVFS implementation on the
> T5. It appears that if you routinely read large amounts of data from a
> database, you will end up corrupting the NVFS cache, which causes
lm Developer Forum"
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 11:54 PM
Subject: Newer and greater NVFS woes
> I think I have found another bug with the NVFS implementation on the
> T5. It appears that if you routinely read large amounts of data from a
> database, you will end up corrupting t
I think I have found another bug with the NVFS implementation on the
T5. It appears that if you routinely read large amounts of data from a
database, you will end up corrupting the NVFS cache, which causes memory
errors when you try to query a record, and eventually crashes the
device.
In my tests
16 matches
Mail list logo
