Thanks. The one you showed work! However, I still
encounter the following problem:
StrPrintF(msg, %02X, byCheckSum);
Assuming byCheckSum = 0xB9
Instead of printing the string B9, it printed
00B9. Please let me know how to fix this
problem. Thanks.
--- Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---
At 06:00 AM 1/28/2002 -0800, Phong Nguyen wrote:
Thanks. The one you showed work! However, I still
encounter the following problem:
StrPrintF(msg, %02X, byCheckSum);
Assuming byCheckSum = 0xB9
Instead of printing the string B9, it printed
00B9. Please let me know how to fix this
problem.
This shouldn't happen. The normal behavior in the case of 0NX, or 0Nd, or
... should be only 0-padded when the yielded string length is shorter than the
precision N.
Does it help if you force type conversion of byCheckSum with (UInt8)?
Max
--- Phong Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. The
Does it help if you force type conversion of
byCheckSum with (UInt8)?
Nop, it doesn't work with casting although byCheckSum
has already been defined as Byte.
Phong
--- Max Bian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This shouldn't happen. The normal behavior in the
case of 0NX, or 0Nd, or
... should
Max Bian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:74864@palm-dev-forum...
This shouldn't happen. The normal behavior in the case of 0NX, or
0Nd, or
... should be only 0-padded when the yielded string length is shorter
than the
precision N.
Does it help if you force type conversion of
It is not, but...
Isn't a good idea to have it behave just like others? Is there a POSIX
standard (or other standard) that the most follow?
Max
--- Ben Combee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remember that StrPrintF is not sprintf. It doesn't behave like the
standard routine in several ways, the
Max Bian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is not, but...
Isn't a good idea to have it behave just like others? Is there a POSIX
standard (or other standard) that the most follow?
The other side of that argument is that if it was supposed to behave
like sprintf, it would have been named
I am tired of using the built-in functions in
CodeWarrior. The book said that StrPrintF is
equivalent to sprintf and that really screw me up when
trying to port some of the existing and working codes
in other platform into CodeWarrior. What I have had to
do is rewriting several sections in the
--- Phong Nguyen wrote:
I am tired of using the built-in functions in
CodeWarrior. The book said that StrPrintF is
equivalent to sprintf and that really screw me up when
trying to port some of the existing and working codes
in other platform into CodeWarrior.
What book says StrPrintF is
Phong Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:74927@palm-dev-forum...
I am tired of using the built-in functions in
CodeWarrior. The book said that StrPrintF is
equivalent to sprintf and that really screw me up when
trying to port some of the existing and working codes
in other
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 06:33:32PM -0800, Dave Carrigan wrote:
Marco Pantaleoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otherwise, as suggested by others, you can resort to #pragma to specify
packed structures, but this is not portable and I'd tend to consider
this one a bad programming practice.
I
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 02:33:49PM -, Laurence Mee wrote:
To be properly portable, you would need a function that takes the byte
stream and populated each of the structure's elements with the appropriate
data (or writes the structure's elements back to the byte stream). However,
I can't
- Original Message -
From: Phong Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Palm Developer Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 9:29 AM
Subject: Re: Code Warrior Compiler bug?
What I want to do is:
char buffer[100];
char* message = buffer;
int index = 0;
buildHeader (message
Phong Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:74740@palm-dev-forum...
Thanks for the answers so far but if there is no
solution for this issue, it would really be a SERIOUS
problem for me and also for everyone out there when
using the built-in function sizeof(..) !!! What
can I
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 07:59:18PM -0800, Phong Nguyen wrote:
What I want to do is:
char buffer[100];
char* message = buffer;
int index = 0;
buildHeader (message[index]);
index += sizeof(HeaderType);
assembleData (message[index]);
index += 10;
buildTrailer (message[index]);
index +=
more about design rather than trying to take
short cuts.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Phong
Nguyen
Sent: 26 January 2002 03:59
To: Palm Developer Forum
Subject: Re: Code Warrior Compiler bug?
What I want to do is:
char buffer[100];
char
Marco Pantaleoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otherwise, as suggested by others, you can resort to #pragma to specify
packed structures, but this is not portable and I'd tend to consider
this one a bad programming practice.
I think that it's a horrible programming practice, and should not be
Hi,
I define a structure as follows:
typedef struct
{
Char name[2];
Char age;
}
InfoType;
I expect that sizeof(InfoType) to be 3. However the
compiler returned sizeof(InfoType) = 4 . Any
suggestion? I guess that I have to change some of the
compiler configuration but do not know
Hint 1: try putting
#pragma warn_padding on
just before that definition.
Hint 2: what is sizeof(InfoType) if you delete the Char name[2]?
At 3:55 PM -0800 1/25/02, Phong Nguyen wrote:
Hi,
I define a structure as follows:
typedef struct
{
Char name[2];
Char age;
}
InfoType;
I
Phong Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I define a structure as follows:
typedef struct
{
Char name[2];
Char age;
}
InfoType;
I expect that sizeof(InfoType) to be 3. However the
compiler returned sizeof(InfoType) = 4 . Any
suggestion? I guess that I have to
--- Phong Nguyen wrote:
I define a structure as follows:
typedef struct
{
Char name[2];
Char age;
}
InfoType;
I expect that sizeof(InfoType) to be 3. However the
compiler returned sizeof(InfoType) = 4 .
The processors currently used by Palm OS devices do not allow
At 5:02 PM -0800 1/25/02, Joe wrote:
--- Phong Nguyen wrote:
I define a structure as follows:
typedef struct
{
Char name[2];
Char age;
}
InfoType;
I expect that sizeof(InfoType) to be 3. However the
compiler returned sizeof(InfoType) = 4 .
The processors currently
I wrote:
The processors currently used by Palm OS devices do not allow
addressing of odd-numbered bytes,
--- Keith Rollin wrote:
Sure they do! How else would it access name[1]?
Of course, Keith is right. What I meant is that variables must be
aligned on an even boundry. Naturally, you
Thanks for the answers so far but if there is no
solution for this issue, it would really be a SERIOUS
problem for me and also for everyone out there when
using the built-in function sizeof(..) !!! What
can I do if I want to define several structure types
defined a structure of a message and
What exactly is the problem you have? Accessing the data in the MessageType
struct? How is that a problem? Because sizeof() doesn't give you the size you
expect? What structure pointers are you talking about?
Max
--- Phong Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the answers so far but if
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 06:50:53PM -0800, Joe wrote:
I wrote:
The processors currently used by Palm OS devices do not allow
addressing of odd-numbered bytes,
--- Keith Rollin wrote:
Sure they do! How else would it access name[1]?
Of course, Keith is right. What I meant is that
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 07:12:47PM -0800, Phong Nguyen wrote:
Thanks for the answers so far but if there is no
solution for this issue, it would really be a SERIOUS
problem for me and also for everyone out there when
using the built-in function sizeof(..) !!! What
can I do if I want to
too sure how you are intending on using sizeof either - but
there are always alternatives.
Laurence Mee.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Phong
Nguyen
Sent: 26 January 2002 03:13
To: Palm Developer Forum
Subject: Re: Code Warrior Compiler
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 04:39:05AM +0100, Marco Pantaleoni wrote:
You should really encode/decode your messages by manipulating
sequences of bytes / words / dwords as needed.
Remember also that when you encode/decode words and dwords in a way
that is intended to be portable between
What I want to do is:
char buffer[100];
char* message = buffer;
int index = 0;
buildHeader (message[index]);
index += sizeof(HeaderType);
assembleData (message[index]);
index += 10;
buildTrailer (message[index]);
index += sizeof(TrailerType);
and return index as the size of the built message.
--- Phong Nguyen wrote:
What I want to do is:
char buffer[100];
char* message = buffer;
int index = 0;
buildHeader (message[index]);
index += sizeof(HeaderType);
assembleData (message[index]);
index += 10;
...
You haven't really explained why you want this, but assuming you must
have
31 matches
Mail list logo
