[Pan-users] pan systray behavior

2012-10-01 Thread Duncan
This is mostly aimed at Heinrich, and I'd post it to the dev list, except for the fact that last time I tried, I couldn't consistently get my posts to appear there; some posts appeared, some didn't, with no pattern that I could see. So I'll post here, where my posts DO seem to show up

Re: [Pan-users] article-cache v 0.139

2012-10-01 Thread Duncan
Heinrich Müller posted on Mon, 01 Oct 2012 07:20:34 +0200 as excerpted: Am 30.09.2012 23:54, schrieb Duncan: Heinrich Müller posted on Sun, 30 Sep 2012 21:38:30 +0200 as excerpted: Am 30.09.2012 20:01, schrieb poub281104-...@yahoo.fr: So what can I deduce ? Some usenet providers are faulty

Re: [Pan-users] article-cache v 0.139

2012-10-01 Thread poub281104-pan
--- En date de : Lun 1.10.12, Heinrich Müller heinrich.muelle...@googlemail.com a écrit : De: Heinrich Müller heinrich.muelle...@googlemail.com Objet: Re: [Pan-users] article-cache v 0.139 À: pan-users@nongnu.org Date: Lundi 1 octobre 2012, 7h20 Am 30.09.2012 23:54, schrieb Duncan:

Re: [Pan-users] article-cache v 0.139

2012-10-01 Thread Heinrich Müller
Am 01.10.2012 15:57, schrieb poub281104-...@yahoo.fr: I have read the doc about git and it looks difficult. Is it possible to put a version of your hacked pan so I can check if it works for ubuntu 12.04 X64 ? Do the following in a console. sudo apt-get -y dist-upgrade sudo apt-get install

Re: [Pan-users] article-cache v 0.139

2012-10-01 Thread Heinrich Müller
Am 01.10.2012 15:57, schrieb poub281104-...@yahoo.fr: --- En date de : Lun 1.10.12, Heinrich Müller heinrich.muelle...@googlemail.com a écrit : De: Heinrich Müller heinrich.muelle...@googlemail.com Objet: Re: [Pan-users] article-cache v 0.139 À: pan-users@nongnu.org Date: Lundi 1 octobre

Re: [Pan-users] pan systray behavior

2012-10-01 Thread Duncan
Heinrich Müller posted on Mon, 01 Oct 2012 16:23:16 +0200 as excerpted: Am 01.10.2012 11:26, schrieb Duncan: (Rant about systrays ;) . snip . I'm with you. Fix pushed to master. Could you check if it fits your needs? Definitely better. I'll use it for a bit and see how it goes...

Re: [Pan-users] article-cache v 0.139

2012-10-01 Thread Rhialto
On Mon 01 Oct 2012 at 11:43:08 +, Duncan wrote: But usenetbucket's devs apparently didn't read past null, and took it to be null-as-in-byte-0x00. I've often wondered just how often that ambiguity causes issues. Here we have a case in point! Another issue that seems to confuse many

Re: [Pan-users] article-cache v 0.139

2012-10-01 Thread Duncan
Rhialto posted on Mon, 01 Oct 2012 18:34:51 +0200 as excerpted: On Mon 01 Oct 2012 at 11:43:08 +, Duncan wrote: But usenetbucket's devs apparently didn't read past null, and took it to be null-as-in-byte-0x00. I've often wondered just how often that ambiguity causes issues. Here we

[Pan-users] squished headers pane columns

2012-10-01 Thread thufir
I've done a clean install of Ubuntu 12.10 and have a few kinks to work out. One oddity is that Pan can display either Subject or Date but not both in the header pane. On the same computer, it used to work fine, there would be a subject column and a date (and author, etc) columns. In

Re: [Pan-users] squished headers pane columns

2012-10-01 Thread Duncan
thufir posted on Mon, 01 Oct 2012 23:06:21 + as excerpted: I've done a clean install of Ubuntu 12.10 and have a few kinks to work out. Did you keep your home dir and configure it to be reused with the new setup? If so, it's possible the problem is there. Pan's data-dir default (if the

Re: [Pan-users] squished headers pane columns

2012-10-01 Thread thufir
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 02:15:55 +, Duncan wrote: The other possibility... you DID double-check to ensure that you're running at the same desktop resolution, right? If you're running a lower resolution, then things will be bigger and take more room on screen. And you didn't mention it so

Re: [Pan-users] html

2012-10-01 Thread Heinrich Müller
Am Tue, 11 Sep 2012 05:23:26 + schrieb Duncan: Steven D'Aprano posted on Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:38:58 +1000 as excerpted: On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:21:40AM +, Duncan wrote: However, there HAS been discussion of the possibility of implementing a simple dumb tag stripper mode (which