Re: Input pattern

2016-03-27 Thread Ali Roustaei
This is great that it works to some extent in the git version. For my application I don't need wrapping behavior too and probably there are a bunch of others who don't need. I'll check the git version, thanks. On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Ole Tange wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23,

Re: Citation requirement and the GPL

2016-03-27 Thread Martin Møller Skarbiniks Pedersen
On 27 March 2016 at 23:35, Christopher Jefferson wrote: > I am happy to accept that, but I feel that this requirement violates > the GPL, the GPL FAQ specifically covers this case: > > Nope. I don't think you are right saying that the GPL FAQ in this section

Re: Citation requirement and the GPL

2016-03-27 Thread Christopher Jefferson
On 27 March 2016 at 18:26, Ole Tange wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Christopher Jefferson > wrote: > : >> Would I cite 'parallel' if it was an integral part of my research >> project (for example, a parallelisation project)? Of course! Further,

Re: GNU Parallel 20160322 ('Bruxelles') released

2016-03-27 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi Ole, thanks for your reply. On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 20:00:57 +0200 Ole Tange wrote: > All in all I come to the conclusion that the benefits are small and > the downsides are just a bit bigger than the benefits. So for the > foreseeable future there will not be an extra format. >

Re: Using --dryrun records to the joblog as a successful event, which ignores "real" runs.

2016-03-27 Thread Ole Tange
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Pariksheet Nanda wrote: > I'm using GNU Parallel version 20150810 when both --joblog and --dryrun > together. This has the side effect of recording the dryrun as "successful" > in the joblog. Fixed in current release. /Ole

Re: GNU Parallel 20160322 ('Bruxelles') released

2016-03-27 Thread Ole Tange
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote: : > One note: can the tarball also be supplied as tar.xz? I checked and it reduces > the size quite a bit. I have considered that. I get 1053860 (xz) vs. 1265407 (bz2). So a saving of 200 KB. Less than a photo these

Re: Citation requirement and the GPL

2016-03-27 Thread Ole Tange
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Christopher Jefferson wrote: : > Would I cite 'parallel' if it was an integral part of my research > project (for example, a parallelisation project)? Of course! Further, > if I reported times taken I would cite parallel, as it would be an

Re: Citation requirement and the GPL

2016-03-27 Thread Hans Schou
2016-03-27 11:20 GMT+02:00 Christopher Jefferson : > If I used parallel to simply speed up a set of analysis of data? Then > I would not cite it, in the same way I wouldn't cite xargs This is actually what 'parallel' does for most people: Replacing xargs to get more