Re: [Paraview] [Paraview-developers] ParaView bug hackathon

+1. I will be there. On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Berk Geveci wrote: > Hi folks, > > We are planning a ParaView bug hackathon on July 13. Going forward, we would > like this to be a monthly event during which the community comes together to > address bugs reported to

[Paraview] ParaView bug hackathon

Hi folks, We are planning a ParaView bug hackathon on July 13. Going forward, we would like this to be a monthly event during which the community comes together to address bugs reported to the tracker. It will be an all day event that we will host physically at Kitware Headquarters in Clifton

Re: [Paraview] Questions on Paraview with 3D vector fields

Jim, It looks like you are asking two questions. The first question is about using the glyph filter. I'm not sure what the confusion is. The arrow glyph filter works equal well with polygons and polyhedral. I have no trouble loading in a 3D dataset with 3D cells and cell-centered data. I just

Re: [Paraview] capability of ParaView, Catalyst in distributed computing environment ...

Hi, Glad to hear that this is working for you and thanks for sharing how you did it! This is definitely a corner case that few Catalyst users/developers will ever care about so I'm glad that the Catalyst API is flexible enough to handle this. Best, Andy On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 4:07 AM,

[Paraview] Transparent background in python scripts

Hi! How can I save screenshots with a transparent (alpha channel based) background from a python script? Currently, I'm using this command to save screenshots: SaveScreenshot('image.png', magnification=3, view=renderView) But this does not write the alpha channel information. Using "File/

Re: [Paraview] Comparison of Visit and ParaView development

Hi Paul, This is very valid criticism. As I read it, there are two parts to the issue. > How bugs are handled. You are absolutely right that we have done a poor job responding to community bug reports and fixes. Both on VTK & ParaView bug trackers but especially on the ParaView side. We have

Re: [Paraview] Can a collaborative client share a pipeline without creating a view itself?

Well, I see that I'll need some more debug sessions to get this solved. >Why not make M aware of the code that needs to be executed and then >just trigger those through higher level messages from S? This is like >your first option, but you're only sending coarse messages eg. "Do >Action1" etc to

Re: [Paraview] Can a collaborative client share a pipeline without creating a view itself?

Peter, > Or does additional > documentation (design documents, message exchange protocols, ...) exist? Sorry my friend. Nothing more than what I previously mentioned on the mailing list. http://www.paraview.org/ParaView/images/2/24/ParaViewCollaborationChanges.pdf

Re: [Paraview] Can a collaborative client share a pipeline without creating a view itself?

Dear Utkarsh, to have some basis for this discussion, I'd like to mention that my knowledge on the collaboration functionality is limited to what is shown in http://vimeo.com/34480656 and to the class reference

Re: [Paraview] [EXTERNAL] Re: Comparison of Visit and ParaView development

Hi all, Thanks for all the replies and sudden bug report action ;-) I haven't had the time to check the bugs that got updated, will try to do that soon. Regards, Paul On 16-06-16 19:06, Scott, W Alan wrote: Paul, I looked at a few of the bugs listed below. I replicated 15944, this would