On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 14:36:53 -0500, Cory Quammen wrote:
> Thanks for the report. I looked into this and I think I know what is going on.
>
> In ParaView 5.2.0, we reduced the number of Python modules that
> shipped with the ParaView binaries. One of the modules not included
> was the "compiler
Guillaume,
Thanks for the report. I looked into this and I think I know what is going on.
In ParaView 5.2.0, we reduced the number of Python modules that
shipped with the ParaView binaries. One of the modules not included
was the "compiler" module. Now, Numpy checks to see if the "compiler"
modul
Ah, then you can skip the filter and directly make a vtkUnstructuredGrid
containing only points and VTK_VERTEX cell that index them.
See section 3 of the users guide for details. Somewhere in your adaptor you
will have something like the following:
output = vtk.vtkUnstructuredGrid()
pts = output
Hello,
thank you, but I mean how to pass these point data computed by a simulation
code to ParaView in order to visualize them insitu. The Catalyst examples
(https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/tree/master/Examples/Catalyst)
usually use some type of a grid and data are then attached on
Glyph Filter, type=2D subtype=points will create 1D cells (VTK_POINTS type)
for every point (those that are attached to cells and those that are not
used by any cell). To get only those points that are not used by cells, you
may need the programmable filter.
David E DeMarle
Kitware, Inc.
R&D Engi
Hello,
is there any way how to export data using Catalyst which are not attached to
any grid (like particles that are characterized only by the vector of their
location)? Thank you!
Petr Valenta
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware
Thanks David,
The Python code works well enough for my use. I see what you mean about
5.1, it almost does what I want, but is messes up the light directions.
Regards, Bob
On 6 January 2017 at 13:49, David E DeMarle
wrote:
> Bob,
>
> There is no control for that just yet. Work is in progress t
Hi,
I've created a gitlab issue at
https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/issues/17098.
Alan, note that the both Select Through Points may be too fast to notice
the difference. On my machine the first one seemed instantaneous while the
second one took about 3 seconds or so.
Thanks,
Andy
p
Bob,
There is no control for that just yet. Work is in progress to provide the
full complement of light controls. If you are working in builting mode, you
can resort to python as follows.
lights = GetActiveView().GetRenderer().GetLights()
for i in range(0, lights.GetNumberOfItems()):
lights.Ge
Hi,
I'm using version 5.2 of ParaView.
Thanks, Bob
On 6 January 2017 at 00:17, Scott, W Alan wrote:
> Bob,
>
> What version of ParaView are you using? 5.1.2 is known to have issues.
>
>
>
> Alan
>
>
>
> *From:* ParaView [mailto:paraview-boun...@paraview.org] *On Behalf Of *Bob
> Flandard
> *S
10 matches
Mail list logo