I think making the option advanced makes sense. Dave, any objections?
Utkarsh
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Tim Gallagher tim.gallag...@gatech.edu wrote:
Hi,
I just built off the master branch (commit 4f0d9672) and I noticed
XDMF_WRAP_PYTHON was no longer an option.
It appears it was
That should work. Ideally we can get packaging XDMF's python module working
properly for the next major release. I just created a bug for that task
here:
http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12445
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit
utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com wrote:
I think
Ayachit utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com
Cc: gtg0...@mail.gatech.edu, ParaView list paraview@paraview.org
Sent: Monday, August 1, 2011 12:05:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Xdmf on master branch
That should work. Ideally we can get packaging XDMF's python module working
properly for the next major release
Hi,
I just built off the master branch (commit 4f0d9672) and I noticed
XDMF_WRAP_PYTHON was no longer an option.
It appears it was set to INTERNAL in commit 7ac1f751, which was due to the
conversation in the mailing list
(http://markmail.org/message/gapnf4reuazdtfcn), although I'm not sure
