Re: [Paraview] SurfaceLIC issues with Paraview 5.2.0

[Faiz Abidi]

Yeah, I think so too, but the admins who have installed Qt on the HPC
clusters here didn't build the xmlpatterns binary. Hence, I don't have it
on my system.

It is a bit weird though that this should mess with SurfaceLIC plugin
unless I misread the Qt docs. I think for now I'll skip this plugin and
install Paraview.

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit <
utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> wrote:

> Set the xmlpatterns executable, if you have it. I am sure that's
> what's messing the build up.
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Faiz Abidi  wrote:
> > Utkarsh - I think I am missing /usr/lib64/qt4/bin/xmlpatterns but that's
> > just a warning. Attached is the CMakeCache file.
> >
> > Christophe - That didn't work for me. But thanks for suggesting.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Christophe Trophime
> >  wrote:
> >>
> >> I had a similar problem on debian
> >>
> >> export QT_SELECT=qt5 or qt4
> >>
> >> before running cmake fix the problem
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Christophe TROPHIME
> >> Research Engineer
> >>
> >> CNRS - LNCMI
> >> 25, rue des Martyrs
> >> BP 166
> >> 38042 GRENOBLE Cedex 9
> >> FRANCE
> >>
> >> Tel : +33 (0)4 76 88 90 02
> >> Fax : +33 (0) 4 76 88 10 01
> >> Office U 19
> >> M@il : christophe.troph...@lncmi.cnrs.fr
> >>
> >> - Original Message -
> >> > From: "Utkarsh Ayachit" 
> >> > To: "Faiz Abidi" 
> >> > Cc: "ParaView" 
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 8:16:20 PM
> >> > Subject: Re: [Paraview] SurfaceLIC issues with Paraview 5.2.0
> >> >
> >> > Can you post your CMakeCache.txt? I suspect one of the Qt help
> >> > generation tools was not found/set correctly.
> >> >
> >> > Utkarsh
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Faiz Abidi  wrote:
> >> > > Hello community,
> >> > >
> >> > > Anyone faced issues with Paraview 5.2.0 and the SurfaceLIC plugin?
> >> > > When I
> >> > > install Paraview from source, I get the below error.
> >> > >
> >> > > "/bin/sh: line 0: cd:
> >> > > /home/fabidi89/git/ParaView/build_usingCCMake/Plugins/
> SurfaceLIC/doc:
> >> > > No
> >> > > such file or directory
> >> > > make[2]: *** [Plugins/SurfaceLIC/doc/SurfaceLIC.qch] Error 1
> >> > > make[1]: *** [Plugins/SurfaceLIC/CMakeFiles/SurfaceLIC.dir/all]
> Error
> >> > > 2"
> >> > >
> >> > > I am not sure if I am missing a dependency. The install works fine
> >> > > without
> >> > > this plugin.
> >> > >
> >> > > Anyone seen this before?
> >> > > --
> >> > > Faiz Abidi | Master's Student at Virginia Tech | www.faizabidi.com
> |
> >> > > +1-540-998-6636
> >> > >
> >> > > ___
> >> > > Powered by www.kitware.com
> >> > >
> >> > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> >> > > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> >> > >
> >> > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> >> > > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
> >> > >
> >> > > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
> >> > >
> >> > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> >> > > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
> >> > >
> >> > ___
> >> > Powered by www.kitware.com
> >> >
> >> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> >> > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> >> >
> >> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> >> > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
> >> >
> >> > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
> >> >
> >> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> >> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Faiz Abidi | Master's Student at Virginia Tech | www.faizabidi.com |
> > +1-540-998-6636
>



-- 
Faiz Abidi | Master's Student at Virginia Tech | www.faizabidi.com |
+1-540-998-6636
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] Installing paraviewweb on a raspberry pi

[Faiz Abidi]

Hi Faraz,

I can look into your system if you can provide me ssh access. I don't
promise to fix your issue but have experience with Raspberry Pis and
Paraview builds. And I don't need money, I'll do it out of curiosity and in
free time :)

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Faraz Hussain  wrote:

> Unfortunately, I am not having much luck getting Paraview to build. I keep
> trying to configure (c), but the generate (g) option does not come. I am
> wondering if someone would be willing to poke around in my system . I can
> pay some nominal amount for your time. However , since this is mainly for
> education my budget is limited ( ~$100 ).
>
>
> Quoting Sebastien Jourdain :
>
> You need to hit [c](configure) several time before getting the generate.
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Scott Wittenburg <
>> scott.wittenb...@kitware.com> wrote:
>>
>> Also for paraviewweb, don't forget:
>>>
>>> PARAVIEW_ENABLE_PYTHON=ON
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Scott Wittenburg <
>>> scott.wittenb...@kitware.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I would think you'd want to build with:

 PARAVIEW_BUILD_QT_GUI=OFF

 Hope this helps,

 Scott

 On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Faraz Hussain 
 wrote:

 Thanks for your help in installing Paraview on a raspberry pi. I
> followed the steps in:
>
> http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView:Build_And_Install
>
> However, when I configure ccmake it says QT is needed. I could not
> figure out if I can ignore that. The "generate" command did not come
> up.
>
> On a side note, it took me a while to find ccmake. I thought it was
> installed with cmake, but seems I had to install it separately using
> "sudo
> apt-get install cmake-curses-gui" . Perhaps the instructions should be
> updated to reflect this to avoid confusion.
>
>
> Quoting Sebastien Jourdain :
>
> Wow,
>
>>
>> I'm not an expert on raspberry pi but it should be possible.
>> BUT, (and it is a big but) you need some graphics capability for
>> ParaView
>> or good CPUs if you don't have a GPU.
>> Or the rendering will be really slow.
>>
>> The quicker test you can do, is to build ParaView (without Qt) and try
>> to
>> run Visualizer with that ParaView in the command line to see what
>> performance you are getting. If that's reasonable, then all the
>> network
>> setup should be "trivial".
>>
>> ParaView: http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView:Build_And_Install
>> Visualizer: https://kitware.github.io/visualizer/
>>
>> Good luck,
>>
>> Seb
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Faraz Hussain 
>> wrote:
>>
>> I want to be able to manipulate vtk file on my raspberry pi via a web
>>
>>> browser anywhere in the world. I believe I need to install
>>> paraviewweb
>>> and
>>> do some reconfiguration of apache and the virtual hosts?
>>> Unfortunately, I
>>> am not a guru of Linux. So before I attempt it all, is it even
>>> possible to
>>> do this on a raspberry pi? I am using raspian .
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensou
>>> rce/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>
>>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>


>>>
>
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensou
> rce/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>



-- 
Faiz Abidi | Master's Student at Virginia Tech | www.faizabidi.com |
+1-540-998-6636

Re: [Paraview] SurfaceLIC issues with Paraview 5.2.0

[Utkarsh Ayachit]

Set the xmlpatterns executable, if you have it. I am sure that's
what's messing the build up.

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Faiz Abidi  wrote:
> Utkarsh - I think I am missing /usr/lib64/qt4/bin/xmlpatterns but that's
> just a warning. Attached is the CMakeCache file.
>
> Christophe - That didn't work for me. But thanks for suggesting.
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Christophe Trophime
>  wrote:
>>
>> I had a similar problem on debian
>>
>> export QT_SELECT=qt5 or qt4
>>
>> before running cmake fix the problem
>>
>>
>>
>> Christophe TROPHIME
>> Research Engineer
>>
>> CNRS - LNCMI
>> 25, rue des Martyrs
>> BP 166
>> 38042 GRENOBLE Cedex 9
>> FRANCE
>>
>> Tel : +33 (0)4 76 88 90 02
>> Fax : +33 (0) 4 76 88 10 01
>> Office U 19
>> M@il : christophe.troph...@lncmi.cnrs.fr
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> > From: "Utkarsh Ayachit" 
>> > To: "Faiz Abidi" 
>> > Cc: "ParaView" 
>> > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 8:16:20 PM
>> > Subject: Re: [Paraview] SurfaceLIC issues with Paraview 5.2.0
>> >
>> > Can you post your CMakeCache.txt? I suspect one of the Qt help
>> > generation tools was not found/set correctly.
>> >
>> > Utkarsh
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Faiz Abidi  wrote:
>> > > Hello community,
>> > >
>> > > Anyone faced issues with Paraview 5.2.0 and the SurfaceLIC plugin?
>> > > When I
>> > > install Paraview from source, I get the below error.
>> > >
>> > > "/bin/sh: line 0: cd:
>> > > /home/fabidi89/git/ParaView/build_usingCCMake/Plugins/SurfaceLIC/doc:
>> > > No
>> > > such file or directory
>> > > make[2]: *** [Plugins/SurfaceLIC/doc/SurfaceLIC.qch] Error 1
>> > > make[1]: *** [Plugins/SurfaceLIC/CMakeFiles/SurfaceLIC.dir/all] Error
>> > > 2"
>> > >
>> > > I am not sure if I am missing a dependency. The install works fine
>> > > without
>> > > this plugin.
>> > >
>> > > Anyone seen this before?
>> > > --
>> > > Faiz Abidi | Master's Student at Virginia Tech | www.faizabidi.com |
>> > > +1-540-998-6636
>> > >
>> > > ___
>> > > Powered by www.kitware.com
>> > >
>> > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> > > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>> > >
>> > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>> > > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>> > >
>> > > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>> > >
>> > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> > > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>> > >
>> > ___
>> > Powered by www.kitware.com
>> >
>> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>> >
>> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>> > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>> >
>> > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>> >
>> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Faiz Abidi | Master's Student at Virginia Tech | www.faizabidi.com |
> +1-540-998-6636
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

[Paraview] volume vs volume

[Scott, W Alan]

Hi all,
I was trying to find volume for a user, and started wondering if the user 
wanted volume of the dataset, or volume of each cell.  Turns out that there is 
incorrect information on the list.  I believe the following is true:




Volume of the dataset:

  Python Calculator.  Expression: volume(inputs[0]).  Array Name: totalVolume.  
Apply.




Volume of each cell:
  Programmable Filter.  Script, then Apply:

from vtk.numpy_interface import algorithms as algs

volume = algs.volume(inputs[0])
output.CellData.append(volume, 'volumeOfEachCell')




Alan
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] PV5.2 Scalarbar range error

[Cory Quammen]

Hi Bob,

This issue has been identified and a fix will be in ParaView 5.3.0.

Please see https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/issues/17152
for more information.

Thanks,
Cory

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Bob Flandard  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using PV5.2 on Windows 7 64bit.
>
> When a contour plot has a prescribed range that is quite small (or if the
> range of data is small), the scalarbar ignores the upper limit and invents
> its own. This was not so in PV5.1, so could be related to the new off-scale
> color range feature (which was a most welcome addition - thanks).
>
> Two state files attached, with error in PV5.2 and no error in PV 5.1.
>
> Thanks, Bob
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>



-- 
Cory Quammen
Staff R Engineer
Kitware, Inc.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] Installing paraviewweb on a raspberry pi

[Faraz Hussain]

Unfortunately, I am not having much luck getting Paraview to build. I  
keep trying to configure (c), but the generate (g) option does not  
come. I am wondering if someone would be willing to poke around in my  
system . I can pay some nominal amount for your time. However , since  
this is mainly for education my budget is limited ( ~$100 ).


Quoting Sebastien Jourdain :


You need to hit [c](configure) several time before getting the generate.

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Scott Wittenburg <
scott.wittenb...@kitware.com> wrote:


Also for paraviewweb, don't forget:

PARAVIEW_ENABLE_PYTHON=ON

Cheers,

Scott

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Scott Wittenburg <
scott.wittenb...@kitware.com> wrote:


I would think you'd want to build with:

PARAVIEW_BUILD_QT_GUI=OFF

Hope this helps,

Scott

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Faraz Hussain 
wrote:


Thanks for your help in installing Paraview on a raspberry pi. I
followed the steps in:

http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView:Build_And_Install

However, when I configure ccmake it says QT is needed. I could not
figure out if I can ignore that. The "generate" command did not come up.

On a side note, it took me a while to find ccmake. I thought it was
installed with cmake, but seems I had to install it separately using "sudo
apt-get install cmake-curses-gui" . Perhaps the instructions should be
updated to reflect this to avoid confusion.


Quoting Sebastien Jourdain :

Wow,


I'm not an expert on raspberry pi but it should be possible.
BUT, (and it is a big but) you need some graphics capability for
ParaView
or good CPUs if you don't have a GPU.
Or the rendering will be really slow.

The quicker test you can do, is to build ParaView (without Qt) and try
to
run Visualizer with that ParaView in the command line to see what
performance you are getting. If that's reasonable, then all the network
setup should be "trivial".

ParaView: http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView:Build_And_Install
Visualizer: https://kitware.github.io/visualizer/

Good luck,

Seb

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Faraz Hussain 
wrote:

I want to be able to manipulate vtk file on my raspberry pi via a web

browser anywhere in the world. I believe I need to install paraviewweb
and
do some reconfiguration of apache and the virtual hosts?
Unfortunately, I
am not a guru of Linux. So before I attempt it all, is it even
possible to
do this on a raspberry pi? I am using raspian .

___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensou
rce/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview





___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview










___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] Automating contour isosurface values in parallel Catalyst Python script

[Andy Bauer]

Hi Yvan,

Another option is just to compute it yourself. The reason that the global
min and max aren't know in Catalyst is that it requires communication but
many times the value isn't needed so in order to make Catalyst more
efficient it doesn't compute that value for you automatically. In the
Python scripts you can import mpi4py or import vtk and use the
vtkMultiProcessController to do the global operation. Note that for my way
you'll need to call UpdatePipeline(datadescription.GetTime()) before
getting the output and globally determining the value. Then you can set the
isosurfaces values array with that information.

If you try this out and have issues, please let us know and we can go from
there.

Cheers,
Andy

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Joachim Pouderoux <
joachim.pouder...@kitware.com> wrote:

> Hi Yvan,
>
> Regarding MinMax: this filter is indeed not exposed by any standard
> Catalyst edition but it is
> easy to add. See for instance in 
> ParaView/Catalyst/Editions/Extras/manifest.json
> how the
> PVExtractSelection filter is exposed (line 50 and 247).
> Just do the same with the MinMax filter (see proxy's declaration at
> filters.xml:~11725).
>
> Best,
> Joachim
>
>
> *Joachim Pouderoux*, PhD
>
> *Technical Expert - Scientific Computing Team*
> *Kitware SAS *
>
>
> 2017-02-13 17:31 GMT-04:00 Yvan Fournier :
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm in the process of migrating some VTK scripts in the Code_Saturne
>> (code-
>> saturne.org) test suite to Catalyst Python scripts, and am having some
>> difficulty automating some cases using contour plots:
>>
>> For time-dependent data, I do not know the value ranges in advance, and
>> would
>> like to query them so as to build an Isosurface values array spanning that
>> range.
>>
>> I can manage to access the point and cell data arrays and ther ranges, but
>> printing the ranges in parallel, it seems I have local values only, while
>> I need
>> a global range.
>>
>> I searched for examples in the documentation, on the Wiki, ..., and found
>> an
>> example for MinMax, but don't seem to ba able to access the correct type
>> of
>> Proxy under Catalyst (the default servermanager is not connected in the
>> usual
>> way.
>>
>> For scalar bar color look-up tables, I can manage with
>> "coprocessor.WriteImages(datadescription, rescale_lookuptable=True)" in
>> the
>> coprocessing script, but for a more general case such as thar needed for
>> contour
>> plots, I've been running around in circles in the last hours trying to
>> find and
>> adapt a relevant example.
>>
>> Does anyone have a suggestion ? Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Yvan Fournier
>> ___
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>
>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>
>
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/
> opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.3.0 Release Candidate 1 binaries are available for download

[u . utku . turuncoglu]

Hi,

I don't have access to the server right now and I could not check the cake
version but probably it is 3.7.x. So, I'll try to test the newer version
and i'll get back to you then (probably on Thursday). Thanks for your
help.

Regards,

--ufuk

> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:04:50 -0500, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
>> Chuck, is this a CMake version related issue? Ufuk, which cmake
>> version are you using?
>
> It likely is. VTK is now using CMake's C++11 support detection and older
> versions of CMake do not have the required bits for Intel 16. These
> appear to have been introduced in 3.8.0, but may have been in 3.7.0 (I'm
> not completely sure).
>
> --Ben
>

___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.3.0 and VTK-m

[Robert Maynard]

Hi,

As Joachim pointed out currently ParaView requires a specific version
of VTK-m to resolve the exception name problem. Yesterday we merged in
a fix for this problem to VTK (
https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/merge_requests/2469 ) so soon you
will not require a specific version of VTK-m.

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Joachim Pouderoux
 wrote:
> Hello Claire,
>
> Checking at paraview-superbuild project is generally a good idea to answer
> this kind of questions.
>
> In versions.cmake one can see that it downloads this version:
>
> http://www.paraview.org/files/dependencies/vtkm-d32f3457d8049a79cc59fb02c3dfb7879ef90ee3.tar.bz2
>
> This corresponds to the following commit:
>   commit d32f3457d8049a79cc59fb02c3dfb7879ef90ee3
>   Merge: c1f7a07 c6fdcea
>   Author: Kenneth Moreland 
>   Date:   Wed Jan 25 11:07:39 2017 -0500
>
>
> And you will find the build options in vtkm.cmake:
> superbuild_add_project(vtkm
>   DEFAULT_ON
>   DEPENDS tbb cxx11
>   CMAKE_ARGS
>   -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=${BUILD_SHARED_LIBS}
>   -DVTKm_ENABLE_TBB:BOOL=${tbb_enabled}
>   -DVTKm_ENABLE_RENDERING:BOOL=OFF
>   -DVTKm_ENABLE_TESTING:BOOL=OFF
>   -DTBB_ROOT:PATH=)
>
> Best,
> Joachim
>
> Joachim Pouderoux, PhD
>
> Technical Expert - Scientific Computing Team
> Kitware SAS
>
>
> 2017-02-14 11:17 GMT-04:00 GUILBAUD Claire :
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm trying to build ParaView 5.3.0 with the last version of VTK-m (sources
>> download today using git clone https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk-m.git). I
>> compile VTK-m with TBB backend (version 4.2), gcc 4.9 and -std=c++11 option.
>>
>> I have the following issues a lot of times when compiling :
>>
>> In file included from
>> .../ParaView-v5.3.0-RC1/VTK/Accelerators/Vtkm/vtkmContour.cxx:30:0:
>> .../ParaView-v5.3.0-RC1/VTK/Accelerators/Vtkm/vtkmlib/Storage.h: In member
>> function 'vtkm::cont::internal::Storage> tovtkm::vtkAOSArrayContainerTag>& vtkm::cont::internal::Storage> tovtkm::vtkAOSArrayContainerTag>::operator=(const
>> vtkm::cont::internal::Storage> tovtkm::vtkAOSArrayContainerTag>&)':
>> .../ParaView-v5.3.0-RC1/VTK/Accelerators/Vtkm/vtkmlib/Storage.h:69:13:
>> error: 'ErrorControlBadValue' is not a member of 'vtkm::cont'
>>throw vtkm::cont::ErrorControlBadValue(
>>
>> Looking at sources, it seems that vtkm::cont::ErrorControlBadValue has
>> been replaced by vtkm::cont::ErrorBadValue.
>>
>> I can patch all sources, but I think it's not a good idea.
>>
>> So, which version of VTK-m is needed for ParaView 5.3.0 ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Claire
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>
>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] Automating contour isosurface values in parallel Catalyst Python script

[Joachim Pouderoux]

Hi Yvan,

Regarding MinMax: this filter is indeed not exposed by any standard
Catalyst edition but it is
easy to add. See for instance in
ParaView/Catalyst/Editions/Extras/manifest.json how the
PVExtractSelection filter is exposed (line 50 and 247).
Just do the same with the MinMax filter (see proxy's declaration at
filters.xml:~11725).

Best,
Joachim


*Joachim Pouderoux*, PhD

*Technical Expert - Scientific Computing Team*
*Kitware SAS *


2017-02-13 17:31 GMT-04:00 Yvan Fournier :

> Hello,
>
> I'm in the process of migrating some VTK scripts in the Code_Saturne (code-
> saturne.org) test suite to Catalyst Python scripts, and am having some
> difficulty automating some cases using contour plots:
>
> For time-dependent data, I do not know the value ranges in advance, and
> would
> like to query them so as to build an Isosurface values array spanning that
> range.
>
> I can manage to access the point and cell data arrays and ther ranges, but
> printing the ranges in parallel, it seems I have local values only, while
> I need
> a global range.
>
> I searched for examples in the documentation, on the Wiki, ..., and found
> an
> example for MinMax, but don't seem to ba able to access the correct type of
> Proxy under Catalyst (the default servermanager is not connected in the
> usual
> way.
>
> For scalar bar color look-up tables, I can manage with
> "coprocessor.WriteImages(datadescription, rescale_lookuptable=True)" in
> the
> coprocessing script, but for a more general case such as thar needed for
> contour
> plots, I've been running around in circles in the last hours trying to
> find and
> adapt a relevant example.
>
> Does anyone have a suggestion ? Thanks in advance,
>
> Yvan Fournier
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/
> opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.3.0 and VTK-m

[Joachim Pouderoux]

Hello Claire,

Checking at paraview-superbuild
 project is
generally a good idea to answer this kind of questions.

In versions.cmake one can see that it downloads this version:

http://www.paraview.org/files/dependencies/vtkm-d32f3457d8049a79cc59fb02c3dfb7879ef90ee3.tar.bz2

This corresponds to the following commit:
  commit d32f3457d8049a79cc59fb02c3dfb7879ef90ee3
  Merge: c1f7a07 c6fdcea
  Author: Kenneth Moreland 
  Date:   *Wed Jan 25* 11:07:39 2017 -0500


And you will find the build options in vtkm.cmake:
superbuild_add_project(vtkm
  DEFAULT_ON
  DEPENDS tbb cxx11
  CMAKE_ARGS
  -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=${BUILD_SHARED_LIBS}
  -DVTKm_ENABLE_TBB:BOOL=${tbb_enabled}
  -DVTKm_ENABLE_RENDERING:BOOL=OFF
  -DVTKm_ENABLE_TESTING:BOOL=OFF
  -DTBB_ROOT:PATH=)

Best,
Joachim

*Joachim Pouderoux*, PhD

*Technical Expert - Scientific Computing Team*
*Kitware SAS *


2017-02-14 11:17 GMT-04:00 GUILBAUD Claire :

> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to build ParaView 5.3.0 with the last version of VTK-m (sources
> download today using git clone https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk-m.git).
> I compile VTK-m with TBB backend (version 4.2), gcc 4.9 and -std=c++11
> option.
>
> I have the following issues a lot of times when compiling :
>
> In file included from .../ParaView-v5.3.0-RC1/VTK/Ac
> celerators/Vtkm/vtkmContour.cxx:30:0:
> .../ParaView-v5.3.0-RC1/VTK/Accelerators/Vtkm/vtkmlib/Storage.h: In
> member function 'vtkm::cont::internal::Storage tovtkm::vtkAOSArrayContainerTag>& vtkm::cont::internal::Storage tovtkm::vtkAOSArrayContainerTag>::operator=(const
> vtkm::cont::internal::Storage g>&)':
> .../ParaView-v5.3.0-RC1/VTK/Accelerators/Vtkm/vtkmlib/Storage.h:69:13:
> error: 'ErrorControlBadValue' is not a member of 'vtkm::cont'
>throw vtkm::cont::ErrorControlBadValue(
>
> Looking at sources, it seems that vtkm::cont::ErrorControlBadValue has
> been replaced by vtkm::cont::ErrorBadValue.
>
> I can patch all sources, but I think it's not a good idea.
>
> So, which version of VTK-m is needed for ParaView 5.3.0 ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Claire
>
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensou
> rce/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] SurfaceLIC issues with Paraview 5.2.0

[Christophe Trophime]

I had a similar problem on debian

export QT_SELECT=qt5 or qt4

before running cmake fix the problem



Christophe TROPHIME 
Research Engineer 

CNRS - LNCMI 
25, rue des Martyrs 
BP 166 
38042 GRENOBLE Cedex 9 
FRANCE 

Tel : +33 (0)4 76 88 90 02 
Fax : +33 (0) 4 76 88 10 01 
Office U 19 
M@il : christophe.troph...@lncmi.cnrs.fr 

- Original Message -
> From: "Utkarsh Ayachit" 
> To: "Faiz Abidi" 
> Cc: "ParaView" 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 8:16:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [Paraview] SurfaceLIC issues with Paraview 5.2.0
> 
> Can you post your CMakeCache.txt? I suspect one of the Qt help
> generation tools was not found/set correctly.
> 
> Utkarsh
> 
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Faiz Abidi  wrote:
> > Hello community,
> >
> > Anyone faced issues with Paraview 5.2.0 and the SurfaceLIC plugin? When I
> > install Paraview from source, I get the below error.
> >
> > "/bin/sh: line 0: cd:
> > /home/fabidi89/git/ParaView/build_usingCCMake/Plugins/SurfaceLIC/doc: No
> > such file or directory
> > make[2]: *** [Plugins/SurfaceLIC/doc/SurfaceLIC.qch] Error 1
> > make[1]: *** [Plugins/SurfaceLIC/CMakeFiles/SurfaceLIC.dir/all] Error 2"
> >
> > I am not sure if I am missing a dependency. The install works fine without
> > this plugin.
> >
> > Anyone seen this before?
> > --
> > Faiz Abidi | Master's Student at Virginia Tech | www.faizabidi.com |
> > +1-540-998-6636
> >
> > ___
> > Powered by www.kitware.com
> >
> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> >
> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
> >
> > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
> >
> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
> >
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> 
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
> 
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
> 
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] STL files: normal and vertex

[Joachim Pouderoux]

Hello Tiago,

Using Fetch you should end up with a vtkPolyData object which have
accessors to triangle point ids (using GetPolys() then a traversal on the
vtkCellArray or directly using GetCellPoints(). Point coordinates can be
retrieved using GetPoint() function.
So could you be more specific on how you call servermanager.Fetch() and
what you are doing next to retrieve your normals?

Best,
Joachim


*Joachim Pouderoux*, PhD

*Technical Expert - Scientific Computing Team*
*Kitware SAS *


2017-02-14 7:32 GMT-04:00 ufdup :

> Dear all,
>
> I have a contour in Paraview that I would like to export to Matlab. In the
> past I’ve been doing this by generating a STL file which could be read in
> Matlab without any problems.
>
> However, now my STL files are quite large and reading in Matlab is really
> inefficient because of the STL standard way of writing. For my application
> it would be enough to right only the normals and the vertex of the
> triangles.
>
> I am working with the paraview.simple module and so far I can get the
> normals using the Filter ComputeNormals followed by a
> servermanager.Fetch(….). The vertex, however are still missing….
>
> Does anyone know how can I get this kind of information from Paraview
> using Python?
>
> Best Regards,
> Tiago
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/
> opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] SurfaceLIC issues with Paraview 5.2.0

[Utkarsh Ayachit]

Can you post your CMakeCache.txt? I suspect one of the Qt help
generation tools was not found/set correctly.

Utkarsh

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Faiz Abidi  wrote:
> Hello community,
>
> Anyone faced issues with Paraview 5.2.0 and the SurfaceLIC plugin? When I
> install Paraview from source, I get the below error.
>
> "/bin/sh: line 0: cd:
> /home/fabidi89/git/ParaView/build_usingCCMake/Plugins/SurfaceLIC/doc: No
> such file or directory
> make[2]: *** [Plugins/SurfaceLIC/doc/SurfaceLIC.qch] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [Plugins/SurfaceLIC/CMakeFiles/SurfaceLIC.dir/all] Error 2"
>
> I am not sure if I am missing a dependency. The install works fine without
> this plugin.
>
> Anyone seen this before?
> --
> Faiz Abidi | Master's Student at Virginia Tech | www.faizabidi.com |
> +1-540-998-6636
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.3.0 Release Candidate 1 binaries are available for download

[Ben Boeckel]

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:04:50 -0500, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
> Chuck, is this a CMake version related issue? Ufuk, which cmake
> version are you using?

It likely is. VTK is now using CMake's C++11 support detection and older
versions of CMake do not have the required bits for Intel 16. These
appear to have been introduced in 3.8.0, but may have been in 3.7.0 (I'm
not completely sure).

--Ben
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

[Paraview] SurfaceLIC issues with Paraview 5.2.0

[Faiz Abidi]

Hello community,

Anyone faced issues with Paraview 5.2.0 and the SurfaceLIC plugin? When I
install Paraview from source, I get the below error.

"/bin/sh: line 0: cd:
/home/fabidi89/git/ParaView/build_usingCCMake/Plugins/SurfaceLIC/doc: No
such file or directory
make[2]: *** [Plugins/SurfaceLIC/doc/SurfaceLIC.qch] Error 1
make[1]: *** [Plugins/SurfaceLIC/CMakeFiles/SurfaceLIC.dir/all] Error 2"

I am not sure if I am missing a dependency. The install works fine without
this plugin.

Anyone seen this before?
-- 
Faiz Abidi | Master's Student at Virginia Tech | www.faizabidi.com |
+1-540-998-6636
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.3.0 Release Candidate 1 binaries are available for download

[Sebastien Jourdain]

Could you be more explicit regarding the error you encounter as those
output are expected on Windows.

Did you provide the path to ParaView as the argument of the Visualizer
executable?

Thanks,

Seb

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Daniel Zuidinga  wrote:

> paraview web visualizer does not work in windows:
>
> ls: no such file or directory: /Applications
> ls: no such file or directory: /opt
> ls: no such file or directory: /usr/local/opt/
>
>
> Am 13.02.2017 um 17:49 schrieb Cory Quammen:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> Binaries and source code zip files and tar balls for ParaView 5.3.0
>> Release Candidate 1 are now available for download from
>>
>> http://www.paraview.org/download/
>>
>> Please let us know if you run into any problems with this release
>> candidate.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Cory
>>
>>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensou
> rce/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] Cataylst pipeline not updating

[Andy Bauer]

Hi Tim,

I'm glad this fixed the issue. You'll want to always pass in the time to
UpdatePipeline() for Catalyst. The issue was that the pipeline thought that
everything it had was current since the time didn't change and none if the
filters' parameters changed and therefore it skipped recomputing what it
thought would be the same result. I do wonder if the start of the pipeline
should mark that it is modified. I'll have to think about that some more.
Even if that were true though you'd still want to pass in the time value to
UpdatePipeline(). This is true as well for ParaView Python pipelines in
general for time dependent sources.

No problem about the delay in reporting -- I was more than happy to let
your computers do the proof rather than verifying it myself :)

Cheers,
Andy

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Gallagher, Timothy P <
tim.gallag...@gatech.edu> wrote:

> Hi Andy,
>
>
> Looks like passing the current time step into the UpdatePipeline calls
> made it work as expected. Sorry for the delay in reporting, it took a long
> time for the job to move through the queue!
>
>
> Anyway, looks like it's working properly and I am getting the data as
> expected.
>
>
> For future reference, should I always just pass the time in? Or are the
> possibly other, unintended side effects from that as well to watch out for?
>
>
> Thanks again,
>
>
> Tim
>
>
> --
> *From:* Andy Bauer 
> *Sent:* Monday, February 13, 2017 11:30 AM
>
> *To:* Gallagher, Timothy P
> *Cc:* paraview@paraview.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Paraview] Cataylst pipeline not updating
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> It's possible that there's something funky going on when the data set
> being passed through parts of the pipeline are empty. I'm hoping for the
> easy fix with passing in the time since I've know that has caused
> unexpected behavior before. If that doesn't solve your issue then I'll
> probably have to do something similar and run it locally to see what's
> going on.
>
> Cheers,
> Andy
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Gallagher, Timothy P <
> tim.gallag...@gatech.edu> wrote:
>
>> The RequestDataDescription is the same as the default output from the
>> script generator, so I didn't include it. The DoCoProcessing gets called
>> every time step and the volumeIntegrals data is updated and written
>> correctly every delta_t, so I'm confident in that part.
>>
>>
>> I will add the calls you suggested and re-run. It takes some time for it
>> to evolve to the point something will happen -- I don't have it saving data
>> frequently enough to run a quick test, I was expecting the pipeline to save
>> it for me!
>>
>>
>> The other thing that occurred to me -- is there something about the
>> Contour filter that turns it off/disables it when the pipeline is built and
>> there is no surface at that contour level?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
>> --
>> *From:* Andy Bauer 
>> *Sent:* Monday, February 13, 2017 10:56 AM
>> *To:* Gallagher, Timothy P
>> *Cc:* paraview@paraview.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [Paraview] Cataylst pipeline not updating
>>
>> Hi Tim,
>>
>> Try adding in the current time to the UpdatePipeline() calls, e.g.
>> *.UpdatePipeline(datadescription.GetCurrentTime())
>>
>> It's tough to tell with RequestDataDescription() missing but I assume
>> that DoCoProcessing() is getting called when you want, correct?
>>
>> Let me know if that doesn't solve the problem.
>>
>> Best,
>> Andy
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Gallagher, Timothy P <
>> tim.gallag...@gatech.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Back with another question!
>>>
>>>
>>> I have a pipeline that has 1 input and 4 outputs. The simplest is a
>>> IntegrateVariables filter hooked up to the input. Another branch of the
>>> pipeline goes through several PythonCalculator filters and a
>>> CellDataToPointData filter and then arrives at the three outputs:
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. The CD2PD filter is connected to a Contour filter with a single
>>> level, X. This is then connected to an IntegrateVariables filter (used to
>>> compute the area of the Contour) and a Writer.
>>>
>>> 2. The CD2PD filter is also connected to another Contour filter with a
>>> single level Y. This is connected to an IntegrateVariables and Writer just
>>> as in 1.
>>>
>>> 3. The CD2PD filter is sliced two times with each slice in a different
>>> render view to save images.
>>>
>>>
>>> I have the coprocessor running every delta_t seconds. The initial
>>> IntegrateVariables filter is updated with UpdatePipeline and then the
>>> values are saved to disk. This works every step, no issues.
>>>
>>>
>>> I then call UpdatePipeline on both of the Contour and both of the
>>> IntegrateVariables filters in 1 and 2. I check if the 'Area' field in the
>>> IntegrateVariables exceeds a threshold, and if it does, I save the
>>> Contour's to disk as a VTK file. This is not working correctly.
>>>
>>>
>>> If I start the simulation from a point where the Contour's exist in 

Re: [Paraview] Cataylst pipeline not updating

[Gallagher, Timothy P]

Hi Andy,


Looks like passing the current time step into the UpdatePipeline calls made it 
work as expected. Sorry for the delay in reporting, it took a long time for the 
job to move through the queue!


Anyway, looks like it's working properly and I am getting the data as expected.


For future reference, should I always just pass the time in? Or are the 
possibly other, unintended side effects from that as well to watch out for?


Thanks again,


Tim



From: Andy Bauer 
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:30 AM
To: Gallagher, Timothy P
Cc: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Cataylst pipeline not updating

Hi Tim,

It's possible that there's something funky going on when the data set being 
passed through parts of the pipeline are empty. I'm hoping for the easy fix 
with passing in the time since I've know that has caused unexpected behavior 
before. If that doesn't solve your issue then I'll probably have to do 
something similar and run it locally to see what's going on.

Cheers,
Andy

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Gallagher, Timothy P 
> wrote:

The RequestDataDescription is the same as the default output from the script 
generator, so I didn't include it. The DoCoProcessing gets called every time 
step and the volumeIntegrals data is updated and written correctly every 
delta_t, so I'm confident in that part.


I will add the calls you suggested and re-run. It takes some time for it to 
evolve to the point something will happen -- I don't have it saving data 
frequently enough to run a quick test, I was expecting the pipeline to save it 
for me!


The other thing that occurred to me -- is there something about the Contour 
filter that turns it off/disables it when the pipeline is built and there is no 
surface at that contour level?


Thanks,


Tim



From: Andy Bauer >
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 10:56 AM
To: Gallagher, Timothy P
Cc: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Cataylst pipeline not updating

Hi Tim,

Try adding in the current time to the UpdatePipeline() calls, e.g. 
*.UpdatePipeline(datadescription.GetCurrentTime())

It's tough to tell with RequestDataDescription() missing but I assume that 
DoCoProcessing() is getting called when you want, correct?

Let me know if that doesn't solve the problem.

Best,
Andy

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Gallagher, Timothy P 
> wrote:

Back with another question!


I have a pipeline that has 1 input and 4 outputs. The simplest is a 
IntegrateVariables filter hooked up to the input. Another branch of the 
pipeline goes through several PythonCalculator filters and a 
CellDataToPointData filter and then arrives at the three outputs:


1. The CD2PD filter is connected to a Contour filter with a single level, X. 
This is then connected to an IntegrateVariables filter (used to compute the 
area of the Contour) and a Writer.

2. The CD2PD filter is also connected to another Contour filter with a single 
level Y. This is connected to an IntegrateVariables and Writer just as in 1.

3. The CD2PD filter is sliced two times with each slice in a different render 
view to save images.


I have the coprocessor running every delta_t seconds. The initial 
IntegrateVariables filter is updated with UpdatePipeline and then the values 
are saved to disk. This works every step, no issues.


I then call UpdatePipeline on both of the Contour and both of the 
IntegrateVariables filters in 1 and 2. I check if the 'Area' field in the 
IntegrateVariables exceeds a threshold, and if it does, I save the Contour's to 
disk as a VTK file. This is not working correctly.


If I start the simulation from a point where the Contour's exist in the flow 
already, then everything works great and the Area field changes in time and it 
saves the Contour's.


However, if the simulation starts without the Contours already in the flow, the 
Area fields stay zero forever. It's as if the pipeline isn't updating or 
something. I have attached the DoCoProcessing function used. I don't see 
anything immediately obvious that would prevent it from updating or getting the 
correct values for the Area.


Am I missing something about how the pipeline or contour filters update?


Thanks,


Tim

___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview



___

[Paraview] ParaView 5.3.0 and VTK-m

[GUILBAUD Claire]

Hi all,

I'm trying to build ParaView 5.3.0 with the last version of VTK-m 
(sources download today using git clone 
https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk-m.git). I compile VTK-m with TBB 
backend (version 4.2), gcc 4.9 and -std=c++11 option.


I have the following issues a lot of times when compiling :

In file included from 
.../ParaView-v5.3.0-RC1/VTK/Accelerators/Vtkm/vtkmContour.cxx:30:0:
.../ParaView-v5.3.0-RC1/VTK/Accelerators/Vtkm/vtkmlib/Storage.h: In 
member function 'vtkm::cont::internal::Storage& 
vtkm::cont::internal::Storage::operator=(const 
vtkm::cont::internal::Storage&)':
.../ParaView-v5.3.0-RC1/VTK/Accelerators/Vtkm/vtkmlib/Storage.h:69:13: 
error: 'ErrorControlBadValue' is not a member of 'vtkm::cont'

   throw vtkm::cont::ErrorControlBadValue(

Looking at sources, it seems that vtkm::cont::ErrorControlBadValue has 
been replaced by vtkm::cont::ErrorBadValue.


I can patch all sources, but I think it's not a good idea.

So, which version of VTK-m is needed for ParaView 5.3.0 ?

Thanks

Claire


___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] vtkPythonProgrammableFilter Multiple output port?

[Utkarsh Ayachit]

AFIAK, this is not currently supported.

Utkarsh

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:34 PM, michal wozniak  wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Since ParaView 5.2, vtkPythonProgrammableFilter can now accept multiple
> input ports. Is it possible to also have multiple output port?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michal
>
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.3.0 Release Candidate 1 binaries are available for download

[Utkarsh Ayachit]

Chuck, is this a CMake version related issue? Ufuk, which cmake
version are you using?

Utkarsh

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE)
 wrote:
> Hi Cory,
>
> I was trying to install new release candidate from source to test Catalyst
> module but i am getting following error messages under Linux (CentOS) and
> with Intel compiler (2016),
>
>
> CMake Error at VTK/CMake/vtkModuleMacros.cmake:549
> (target_compile_features):
>target_compile_features no known features for CXX compiler
>
>"Intel"
>
>version 16.0.1.20151021.
>  Call Stack (most recent call first):
>VTK/CMake/vtkModuleMacros.cmake:648 (vtk_add_library)
>VTK/Common/Core/CMakeLists.txt:724 (vtk_module_library)
>
>
>
>  CMake Error at VTK/CMake/vtkModuleMacros.cmake:549
> (target_compile_features):
>target_compile_features no known features for CXX compiler
>
>"Intel"
>
>version 16.0.1.20151021.
>  Call Stack (most recent call first):
>VTK/CMake/vtkModuleMacros.cmake:648 (vtk_add_library)
>VTK/Common/Math/CMakeLists.txt:40 (vtk_module_library)
>
> The previous version 5.2.0 was installed without any problem using same
> libraries, compiler and server. So, i just wonder that is there any change
> in configure step related with the compiler definitions? Any suggestion?
>
> Regards,
>
> --ufuk
>
> On 13/02/2017 19:49, Cory Quammen wrote:
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> Binaries and source code zip files and tar balls for ParaView 5.3.0
>> Release Candidate 1 are now available for download from
>>
>> http://www.paraview.org/download/
>>
>> Please let us know if you run into any problems with this release
>> candidate.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Cory
>>
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] XDMF and nested Grid Collections (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Hennessey, Joseph G CTR USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)]

CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

Alessandro,

This looks like a useful feature to add to the reader, and we will put in our 
list of things to work on. But, I can not immediately implement this as we 
have a number of high priority updates such as c++11 support, and an updated 
base Xdmf library currently pending.

Thanks,

Joe

~~~
Joseph G. Hennessey Ph.D., SAIC
Team SAIC
Army Research Lab
DOD Supercomputing Resource Center

-Original Message-
From: ParaView [mailto:paraview-boun...@paraview.org] On Behalf Of Alessandro 
De Maio
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 9:21 AM
To: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] [Paraview] XDMF and nested Grid Collections

All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the 
identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained 
within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.






Hi,

I'm trying to export from a parallel MPI CFD code a set of results using 
xdmf/hdf5 format in order to be read in Paraview.
The computational domain is divided into several parts (unstructured 
polyhedral grid) and the idea is to write a xdmf  with a further subdivision 
to be read in parallel by mpi paraview.
So it's a nested subdivision in which the external level is based on different 
parts of the domain (that should be extractable in Paraview after the reading) 
and each part is divided into a number of chunks equal to the number of 
processes of the parallel Paraview execution. With such a subdivision, reading 
this file with a parallel Paraview execution, each Paraview process loads a 
fraction of each part and, if all the chunks of each part have the same 
dimension, all the Paraview processes are balanced.

In the following there is an example for two parts and two Paraview processes.

I've used nested Grid Collections of type Spatial and it seems that everything 
is ok but the problem is that in Paraview the names of the first level 
collection items  is lost (in the following example  tet_cell1 and tet_cell2) 
and these items are called "Block 0" and "Block 1". The leaf elements of the 
tree instead (Grid_01, Grid_02, ...) mantain their correct name.

I've tried also to change the GridType of the external level from Collection 
to Tree (that should be supported in the xdmf data format) but in this case 
the item in Paraview is empty (0 cells and 0 nodes).

Is there any error in my procedure? It's the first time that I use xdmf.

Thank you in advance for your help.

Alessandro




http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude < 
Caution-http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude > " Version="3.3">
  

  

  
../positive/xdmf/tet_cell1.h5:Data0
  
  
../positive/xdmf/tet_cell1.h5:Data1
  
  
../positive/xdmf/tet_cell1.h5:Data2
  



  
../negative/xdmf/tet_cell1.h5:Data0
  
  
../negative/xdmf/tet_cell1.h5:Data1
  
  
../negative/xdmf/tet_cell1.h5:Data2
  

  

  


  
../positive/xdmf/tet_cell2.h5:Data0
  
  
../positive/xdmf/tet_cell2.h5:Data1
  
  
../positive/xdmf/tet_cell2.h5:Data2
  



  
../negative/xdmf/tet_cell2.h5:Data0
  
  
../negative/xdmf/tet_cell2.h5:Data1
  
  
../negative/xdmf/tet_cell2.h5:Data2
  


  


  



CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] [vtkusers] Open big *.VTK files with ParaView

[Cory Quammen]

Christopher,

I'm moving this to the ParaView mailing list.

As I recall, Microsoft's runtime requires the use of special
file-handling functions for reading files larger than 4 GB, even when
running on a 64-bit version of Windows. I do not believe the VTK
legacy library does not use these functions, which is likely why you
are seeing this behavior in ParaView. I'm not aware of a simple fix,
unfortunately.

Would you mind posting an Issue to the ParaView bug tracker?
https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/issues

Thanks,
Cory

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Eischer, Christopher
 wrote:
> Hello together,
>
>
>
> I’m having poblems to open big vtk files ( about <4GB) with ParaView. With
> smaller files I have no Problems.
>
> For the big files ParaView says that “ a reader for D:\... could not be
> found. Please choose one”.. When I choose the vtk type the files gets loaded
> but nothing is visible.
>
>
>
> Does somebody know a solution?
>
>
>
> My System:
>
> ParaView 5.2.0
>
> Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit
>
> i7-6700 @ 3.4 Ghz with 32 GB Ram
>
>
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
>
>
> Greetings Chris
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the VTK FAQ at:
> http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/VTK_FAQ
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=vtkusers
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/vtkusers
>



-- 
Cory Quammen
Staff R Engineer
Kitware, Inc.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

[Paraview] XDMF and nested Grid Collections

[Alessandro De Maio]

Hi,

I'm trying to export from a parallel MPI CFD code a set of results using
xdmf/hdf5 format in order to be read in Paraview.
The computational domain is divided into several parts (unstructured
polyhedral grid) and the idea is to write a xdmf  with a further
subdivision to be read in parallel by mpi paraview.
So it's a nested subdivision in which the external level is based on
different parts of the domain (that should be extractable in Paraview after
the reading) and each part is divided into a number of chunks equal to the
number of processes of the parallel Paraview execution. With such a
subdivision, reading this file with a parallel Paraview execution, each
Paraview process loads a fraction of each part and, if all the chunks of
each part have the same dimension, all the Paraview processes are balanced.

In the following there is an example for two parts and two Paraview
processes.

I've used nested Grid Collections of type Spatial and it seems that
everything is ok but the problem is that in Paraview the names of the first
level collection items  is lost (in the following example  tet_cell1 and
tet_cell2) and these items are called "Block 0" and "Block 1". The leaf
elements of the tree instead (Grid_01, Grid_02, ...) mantain their correct
name.

I've tried also to change the GridType of the external level from
Collection to Tree (that should be supported in the xdmf data format) but
in this case the item in Paraview is empty (0 cells and 0 nodes).

Is there any error in my procedure? It's the first time that I use xdmf.

Thank you in advance for your help.

Alessandro




http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude; Version="3.3">
  

  

  
../positive/xdmf/tet_cell1.h5:Data0
  
  
../positive/xdmf/tet_cell1.h5:Data1
  
  
../positive/xdmf/tet_cell1.h5:Data2
  



  
../negative/xdmf/tet_cell1.h5:Data0
  
  
../negative/xdmf/tet_cell1.h5:Data1
  
  
../negative/xdmf/tet_cell1.h5:Data2
  

  

  


  
../positive/xdmf/tet_cell2.h5:Data0
  
  
../positive/xdmf/tet_cell2.h5:Data1
  
  
../positive/xdmf/tet_cell2.h5:Data2
  



  
../negative/xdmf/tet_cell2.h5:Data0
  
  
../negative/xdmf/tet_cell2.h5:Data1
  
  
../negative/xdmf/tet_cell2.h5:Data2
  


  


  

___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

[Paraview] STL files: normal and vertex

[ufdup]

Dear all,

I have a contour in Paraview that I would like to export to Matlab. In the
past I’ve been doing this by generating a STL file which could be read in
Matlab without any problems.

However, now my STL files are quite large and reading in Matlab is really
inefficient because of the STL standard way of writing. For my application
it would be enough to right only the normals and the vertex of the
triangles.

I am working with the paraview.simple module and so far I can get the
normals using the Filter ComputeNormals followed by a
servermanager.Fetch(….). The vertex, however are still missing….

Does anyone know how can I get this kind of information from Paraview using
Python?

Best Regards,
Tiago
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.3.0 Release Candidate 1 binaries are available for download

[Daniel Zuidinga]

paraview web visualizer does not work in windows:

ls: no such file or directory: /Applications
ls: no such file or directory: /opt
ls: no such file or directory: /usr/local/opt/


Am 13.02.2017 um 17:49 schrieb Cory Quammen:

Folks,

Binaries and source code zip files and tar balls for ParaView 5.3.0
Release Candidate 1 are now available for download from

http://www.paraview.org/download/

Please let us know if you run into any problems with this release candidate.

Sincerely,
Cory



___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.3.0 Release Candidate 1 binaries are available for download

[u . utku . turuncoglu]

Hi Cory,

I was trying to install new release candidate to test Catalyst module but
i am getting following error messages under Linux (CentOS) and with Intel
compiler (2016),


CMake Error at VTK/CMake/vtkModuleMacros.cmake:549 (target_compile_features):
   target_compile_features no known features for CXX compiler

   "Intel"

   version 16.0.1.20151021.
 Call Stack (most recent call first):
   VTK/CMake/vtkModuleMacros.cmake:648 (vtk_add_library)
   VTK/Common/Core/CMakeLists.txt:724 (vtk_module_library)



 CMake Error at VTK/CMake/vtkModuleMacros.cmake:549
(target_compile_features):
   target_compile_features no known features for CXX compiler

   "Intel"

   version 16.0.1.20151021.
 Call Stack (most recent call first):
   VTK/CMake/vtkModuleMacros.cmake:648 (vtk_add_library)
   VTK/Common/Math/CMakeLists.txt:40 (vtk_module_library)

The previous version 5.2.0 installed without any problem using same
libraries and compiler. So, is there any change related with the compiler
definitions? Any suggestion?

Regards,

--ufuk


> Folks,
>
> Binaries and source code zip files and tar balls for ParaView 5.3.0
> Release Candidate 1 are now available for download from
>
> http://www.paraview.org/download/
>
> Please let us know if you run into any problems with this release
> candidate.
>
> Sincerely,
> Cory
>
> --
> Cory Quammen
> Staff R Engineer
> Kitware, Inc.
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>


___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.3.0 Release Candidate 1 binaries are available for download

[Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE)]

Hi Cory,

I was trying to install new release candidate from source to test 
Catalyst module but i am getting following error messages under Linux 
(CentOS) and with Intel compiler (2016),



CMake Error at VTK/CMake/vtkModuleMacros.cmake:549 
(target_compile_features):

   target_compile_features no known features for CXX compiler

   "Intel"

   version 16.0.1.20151021.
 Call Stack (most recent call first):
   VTK/CMake/vtkModuleMacros.cmake:648 (vtk_add_library)
   VTK/Common/Core/CMakeLists.txt:724 (vtk_module_library)



 CMake Error at VTK/CMake/vtkModuleMacros.cmake:549 
(target_compile_features):

   target_compile_features no known features for CXX compiler

   "Intel"

   version 16.0.1.20151021.
 Call Stack (most recent call first):
   VTK/CMake/vtkModuleMacros.cmake:648 (vtk_add_library)
   VTK/Common/Math/CMakeLists.txt:40 (vtk_module_library)

The previous version 5.2.0 was installed without any problem using same 
libraries, compiler and server. So, i just wonder that is there any 
change in configure step related with the compiler definitions? Any 
suggestion?


Regards,

--ufuk

On 13/02/2017 19:49, Cory Quammen wrote:

Folks,

Binaries and source code zip files and tar balls for ParaView 5.3.0
Release Candidate 1 are now available for download from

http://www.paraview.org/download/

Please let us know if you run into any problems with this release candidate.

Sincerely,
Cory



___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] Copying representation properties

[Mathieu Westphal]

Works perfectly on ParaView 5.2.0 on Windows 10. you may want to try and
reproduce this behavior on other computers/OSes. And let us know how you
use this feature.

Regards,

Mathieu Westphal

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Dimitrova, Maria <
maria.dimitr...@helsinki.fi> wrote:

> Thank you, maybe the problem only exists in the Windows version.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Maria Dimitrova
> --
> *From:* Cory Quammen 
> *Sent:* 12 February 2017 00:30:58
> *To:* Mathieu Westphal
> *Cc:* Dimitrova, Maria; paraview@paraview.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Paraview] Copying representation properties
>
> FWIW, I just tried this with 5.2.0 official binaries on Mac OS X and
> copy/paste of representation properties worked fine.
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Mathieu Westphal <
> mathieu.westp...@kitware.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> I will not be able to test this version right away, will let you know.
>>
>> Mathieu Westphal
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Dimitrova, Maria <
>> maria.dimitr...@helsinki.fi> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for the quick reply. I use the Windows 64 bit MPI OpenCL
>>> version - 5.2.0-RC4.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Maria Dimitrova
>>> --
>>> *From:* Mathieu Westphal 
>>> *Sent:* 10 February 2017 13:44:37
>>> *To:* Dimitrova, Maria
>>> *Cc:* paraview@paraview.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Paraview] Copying representation properties
>>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> I just checked, to copy->Paste feature is working perfectly on ParaView
>>> master git. Which version of ParaView are you using ?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Mathieu Westphal
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Dimitrova, Maria <
>>> maria.dimitr...@helsinki.fi> wrote:
>>>
 Dear all,


 Is there a way to copy the properties of the representation that is
 applied to a filter to another instance of the same filter? In my project I
 use 3D glyphs with sphere size 0.03 and blue colour. I have tried
 right-clicking on the existing filter -> Copy, then Paste to the new
 instance of the filter but the representation is not affected.


 Also, another part of my project involves applying Surface LIC with a
 particular colour scheme and colour range, as well as contrast adjustments
 and antialiasing, all of which are identical for all the files I need to
 process. It would save some time if I could just make a custom
 representation.


 Thank you very much!


 Best regards,

 Maria

 ___
 Powered by www.kitware.com

 Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
 http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

 Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
 http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

 Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

 Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
 http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview


>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>
>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cory Quammen
> Staff R Engineer
> Kitware, Inc.
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview