It sounds like it. I believe that the user would have to use the extract
surface filter first though.
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Scott, W Alan wrote:
> Andy,
> Wouldn't the upcoming volume filter calculate the volume of fragments
> coming from the Connectivity filter?
Andy,
Wouldn't the upcoming volume filter calculate the volume of fragments coming
from the Connectivity filter?
Alan
> -Original Message-
> From: Cory Quammen [mailto:cory.quam...@kitware.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 9:29 PM
> To: Scott, W Alan
> Cc:
As a happy coincidence, Will Schroeder just posted a merge request for
a VTK filter that computes the volumes of connected regions in a poly
data and stores the volumes in field data:
https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/merge_requests/3825. We could
expose this in ParaView once it lands in VTK.
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Scott, W Alan wrote:
> Thanks Andy! Although I will take a round about method, I would love a real
> solution.
>
>
>
> Cory? Thoughts?
>
>
>
> Alan
>
>
>
> From: Andy Bauer [mailto:andy.ba...@kitware.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018
Thanks Andy! Although I will take a round about method, I would love a real
solution.
Cory? Thoughts?
Alan
From: Andy Bauer [mailto:andy.ba...@kitware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 9:24 AM
To: Scott, W Alan ; Quammen, Cory (External Contacts)
Bucky,
I believe that the problem is that - as you suggest below - the material
interface filter only accepts down converted unsigned chars. In my mind, this
is a bug/feature hole. Either, 1) the Material Interface Filter should accept
down converted unsigned chars or default variables, 2) a