On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 21:12 -0800, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2011, at 6:11 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 01:34, Jeff Kirsher
> > wrote:
> >> Patchworks has been a great tool when keeping track of patches, but it
> >> lacks two very useful bits of information.
> >>
>
On Feb 7, 2011, at 6:11 PM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 01:34, Jeff Kirsher
> wrote:
>> Patchworks has been a great tool when keeping track of patches, but it
>> lacks two very useful bits of information.
>>
>> Feature 1- Metrics: It would be great to have the number of patch
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 01:34, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> Patchworks has been a great tool when keeping track of patches, but it
> lacks two very useful bits of information.
>
> Feature 1- Metrics: It would be great to have the number of patches in a
> particular "state" on any given page. For instanc
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 16:13 -0200, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm getting some test failures on a pristine branch of patchwork which I
> was hoping to fix so that I can more easily catch breakage introduced by
> my own changes, but I thought I'd first check here if these are known
>
Hi there,
I'm getting some test failures on a pristine branch of patchwork which I
was hoping to fix so that I can more easily catch breakage introduced by
my own changes, but I thought I'd first check here if these are known
and/or if somebody is already working on them.
The first one is seeming
