Veronika Kabatova writes:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Daniel Axtens"
>> To: "Veronika Kabatova"
>> Cc: patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 6:22:34 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] api: Add comments to patch
- Original Message -
> From: "Daniel Axtens"
> To: "Veronika Kabatova"
> Cc: patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org
> Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 6:22:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] api: Add comments to patch and cover endpoints
>
> >> Notice
>> Notice that it's /patch/1/ for mbox, checks, etc, but /covers/1/ for
>> comments.
>>
>> Is this intentional - am I missing something? - or is this supposed to
>> be /patch/1/ like the others?
>>
>
> Ookay, this is pretty embarrassing. reverse() looks to be confused when
> you have multiple mat
- Original Message -
> From: "Daniel Axtens"
> To: vkaba...@redhat.com, patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 6:55:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] api: Add comments to patch and cover endpoints
>
> Apologies if this is a silly question,
Apologies if this is a silly question, but I was looking at this to
check the perfomance, and I noticed that in the patch list endpoint
(/api/patches/), it seems to be linking to the 'covers' comments
endpoint rather than the 'patches' api endpoint:
...
"delegate": null,
"mbox": "h
- Original Message -
> From: "Stephen Finucane"
> To: vkaba...@redhat.com, patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2018 5:37:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] api: Add comments to patch and cover endpoints
>
> On Wed, 2018-04-25 at 19:33 +020
On Wed, 2018-04-25 at 19:33 +0200, vkaba...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Veronika Kabatova
>
> Signed-off-by: Veronika Kabatova
Two comments below. I've actually addressed these already with my own
patch. Assuming you're happy with said patch, I can squash it with this
one and merge them.
Cheers,
From: Veronika Kabatova
Signed-off-by: Veronika Kabatova
---
patchwork/api/comment.py | 75 ++
patchwork/api/cover.py | 13 ++-
patchwork/api/patch.py | 16 ++-
patchwork/models.py
