On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 11:27 +0100, Stephen Finucane wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 17:46 +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> > On 11/07/17 09:10, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> > > One last bug:
> > >
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/8/33 is being incorrectly parsed as
> > >
On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 17:46 +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> On 11/07/17 09:10, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> > One last bug:
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/8/33 is being incorrectly parsed as
> > https://py3.patchwork.dja.id.au/project/netdev/list/?series=4681
> >
> > It looks like the square
On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 17:46 +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> How are we going now?
I personally have one problem though:
https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/111
Regards,
--
David
___
Patchwork mailing list
Patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org
On 11/07/17 09:10, Daniel Axtens wrote:
One last bug:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/8/33 is being incorrectly parsed as
https://py3.patchwork.dja.id.au/project/netdev/list/?series=4681
It looks like the square brackets are confusing the parser some how.
After we squash this I say we just ship
Sean Farley writes:
> Daniel Axtens writes:
>
>> One last bug:
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/8/33 is being incorrectly parsed as
>> https://py3.patchwork.dja.id.au/project/netdev/list/?series=4681
>>
>> It looks like the square brackets are confusing the
Daniel Axtens writes:
> One last bug:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/8/33 is being incorrectly parsed as
> https://py3.patchwork.dja.id.au/project/netdev/list/?series=4681
>
> It looks like the square brackets are confusing the parser some how.
What a coincidence, I have a
One last bug:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/8/33 is being incorrectly parsed as
https://py3.patchwork.dja.id.au/project/netdev/list/?series=4681
It looks like the square brackets are confusing the parser some how.
After we squash this I say we just ship it.
Regards,
Daniel
Stephen Finucane
On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 09:40 +1000, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > 7364269 parser:
> > Support single-patch "series"
>
> We probably want to see this 'live'.
True. fwiw, I parsed the Patchwork archives on a new instance without issue, so
base parsing looks to be functioning as expected.
Hi,
> 7364269 parser:
> Support single-patch "series"
We probably want to see this 'live'.
> afeaeb2 parser: Use a series even if the version
> differs
This one I'm also nervous about.
I've updated the patchwork.dja family of sites to master, assuming
nothing goes wrong in the next couple of