Re: Patchwork 2.0 ready for takeoff? (redux)

2017-08-23 Thread Stephen Finucane
On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 11:27 +0100, Stephen Finucane wrote: > On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 17:46 +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > > On 11/07/17 09:10, Daniel Axtens wrote: > > > One last bug: > > > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/8/33 is being incorrectly parsed as > > >

Re: Patchwork 2.0 ready for takeoff? (redux)

2017-08-02 Thread Stephen Finucane
On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 17:46 +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > On 11/07/17 09:10, Daniel Axtens wrote: > > One last bug: > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/8/33 is being incorrectly parsed as > > https://py3.patchwork.dja.id.au/project/netdev/list/?series=4681 > > > > It looks like the square

Re: Patchwork 2.0 ready for takeoff? (redux)

2017-07-26 Thread David Demelier
On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 17:46 +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > How are we going now? I personally have one problem though: https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/111 Regards, -- David ___ Patchwork mailing list Patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org

Re: Patchwork 2.0 ready for takeoff? (redux)

2017-07-26 Thread Andrew Donnellan
On 11/07/17 09:10, Daniel Axtens wrote: One last bug: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/8/33 is being incorrectly parsed as https://py3.patchwork.dja.id.au/project/netdev/list/?series=4681 It looks like the square brackets are confusing the parser some how. After we squash this I say we just ship

Re: Patchwork 2.0 ready for takeoff? (redux)

2017-07-11 Thread Sean Farley
Sean Farley writes: > Daniel Axtens writes: > >> One last bug: >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/8/33 is being incorrectly parsed as >> https://py3.patchwork.dja.id.au/project/netdev/list/?series=4681 >> >> It looks like the square brackets are confusing the

Re: Patchwork 2.0 ready for takeoff? (redux)

2017-07-11 Thread Sean Farley
Daniel Axtens writes: > One last bug: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/8/33 is being incorrectly parsed as > https://py3.patchwork.dja.id.au/project/netdev/list/?series=4681 > > It looks like the square brackets are confusing the parser some how. What a coincidence, I have a

Re: Patchwork 2.0 ready for takeoff? (redux)

2017-07-10 Thread Daniel Axtens
One last bug: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/8/33 is being incorrectly parsed as https://py3.patchwork.dja.id.au/project/netdev/list/?series=4681 It looks like the square brackets are confusing the parser some how. After we squash this I say we just ship it. Regards, Daniel Stephen Finucane

Re: Patchwork 2.0 ready for takeoff? (redux)

2017-07-05 Thread Stephen Finucane
On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 09:40 +1000, Daniel Axtens wrote: > Hi, > > > 7364269 parser: > > Support single-patch "series" > > We probably want to see this 'live'. True. fwiw, I parsed the Patchwork archives on a new instance without issue, so base parsing looks to be functioning as expected.

Re: Patchwork 2.0 ready for takeoff? (redux)

2017-07-04 Thread Daniel Axtens
Hi, > 7364269 parser: > Support single-patch "series" We probably want to see this 'live'. > afeaeb2 parser: Use a series even if the version > differs This one I'm also nervous about. I've updated the patchwork.dja family of sites to master, assuming nothing goes wrong in the next couple of