Hi Guilherme,
I see that some emails with patches have a From: field in the body[1],
That's generated by git-format-patch, when the patch author is not the user
generating the patch files.
git-am will use these From: lines to correctly set the author when the patch
is applied to the
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 23:20 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 17 March 2011 23:06, Guilherme Salgado guilherme.salg...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 13:50 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 16-03-2011 11:03, Guilherme Salgado escreveu:
I see that some emails with patches have
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 09:23 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 17-03-2011 19:20, Peter Maydell escreveu:
On 17 March 2011 23:06, Guilherme Salgado guilherme.salg...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 13:50 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 16-03-2011 11:03, Guilherme
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 13:50 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 16-03-2011 11:03, Guilherme Salgado escreveu:
Hi there,
I see that some emails with patches have a From: field in the body[1],
and I'm wondering if there's any reason for not using that (when
available, of course) as
On 17 March 2011 23:06, Guilherme Salgado guilherme.salg...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 13:50 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 16-03-2011 11:03, Guilherme Salgado escreveu:
I see that some emails with patches have a From: field in the body[1],
and I'm wondering if there's
Em 16-03-2011 11:03, Guilherme Salgado escreveu:
Hi there,
I see that some emails with patches have a From: field in the body[1],
and I'm wondering if there's any reason for not using that (when
available, of course) as the patch submitter. Well, now that I think of
it, one could argue
