2016-09-09 20:39, Stephen Finucane: > On 08 Sep 17:41, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to talk about the following commit: > > Allow assigning of any user as delegate > > https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/commit/e0fd7cd91a5 > > > > It can result to a very large list of people in the drop down. > > It is cool that we can use a kind of autocomplete to find someone, > > but it would be better if it was alphabetically sorted. > > Yeah, it isn't ideal as things stand. AFAIK, the ozlabs instance has > that particular patch reverted.
It is also reverted on dpdk.org. > However, I'm hoping to fix it by > reworking that page slightly before 2.0 is released. There's a bug > marked upstream [1], and I hope to switch to an AJAX-based search box. > > > I also wonder if people really want to appear publicly in this list. > > That's why I think it would even better to have an opt-in per-user. > > I could see reasons for wanting this, but having a "don't index me" > option isn't something I could see being viable/useful. This > information is already available, either through screenscraping > Patchwork or parsing mbox files from an archive. I was talking about patchwork users who do not participate on the mailing list and do not want to appear anywhere. > > Finally some projects may choose to make things simpler and classify > > patches only automatically or to maintainers (the old behaviour). > > For those projects, a global option to enable/disable user delegation > > would be great. > > Not a bad idea. I'll consider that in the above work. Thanks Stephen _______________________________________________ Patchwork mailing list Patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork